The Phantom Menace, a PG-13 sci-fi film, grossed more than X2, also a PG-13 sci-fi film. I fail to see your point.Obviously the Titanic in More peoples eyes.
Not mine.
You're comparing 2 different genres and 2 different ratings
In this case both are sci-Fi and had an R rating.
Thank you for helping me make my point.
Of course I do; I have a degree in Film Studies, after all. That's not the issue here. The issue is you were comparing two films in the same genre with the same rating. I was doing the same, albeit using a different rating. You were saying that due to The Matrix's high gross, it was a better film than Dark City. Would you say the same thing about The Phantom Menace and X2?Please tell me you can see how a PG-13 movie would have a bigger audience than an R rated one.
I should go back for further studies? Your grammar and spelling are like something out of my worst nightmares.Maybe you should go back for further studies.
I'm not sure what you are getting at.
Your trying to compare Star Wars crazed fans with a new franchise in the Matrix?
I'm not trying to compare Star Wars to The Matrix. In fact, I'm comparing the gross of The Phantom Menace, the fourth film in a then twenty-two year old franchise, with X2, the second film in a then forty-year old franchise. This is a more than fair comparison. The fans are equally as rabid and obsessive, yet The Phantom Menace grossed more...and is a poorer film. Ergo, a film's gross has no direct correlation to its level of quality.
Can't argue with that logic-well, you can, but only to reveal the depths of one's ignorance. I think you make a very valid point. Another valid point would be that Matrix and Dark City BOTH steal from authors like William Gibson-so really, who's to say where the original ideas came from?
I should go back for further studies? Your grammar and spelling are like something out of my worst nightmares.Maybe you should go back for further studies.
I'm not sure what you are getting at.
Your trying to compare Star Wars crazed fans with a new franchise in the Matrix?
I'm not trying to compare Star Wars to The Matrix. In fact, I'm comparing the gross of The Phantom Menace, the fourth film in a then twenty-two year old franchise, with X2, the second film in a then forty-year old franchise. This is a more than fair comparison. The fans are equally as rabid and obsessive, yet The Phantom Menace grossed more...and is a poorer film. Ergo, a film's gross has no direct correlation to its level of quality.
Obviously the Titanic in More peoples eyes.
Not mine.
You're comparing 2 different genres and 2 different ratings
In this case both are sci-Fi and had an R rating.
Thank you for helping me make my point.
The Phantom Menace, a PG-13 sci-fi film, grossed more than X2, also a PG-13 sci-fi film. I fail to see your point.
Agreed. Hey, we agree on something!The Phantom Menace was the first Star Wars film in 16 years and the supposed beginning of the movie saga so people were pretty rabid to see it.
No, they have not -- but the franchise has been around since 1963. Notice how I used the word "franchise", not "film franchise".The X-Men films have been around forty years? hmmmm..
The first two Star Wars films were more well received than Jedi; why should people be rushing out to see TPM?
Man, what is it with you and The Matrix? Give it a rest.
Oh, wow, crap I know already. Thanks, Dad!
Oh, more crap I already know! You also have to consider that Revolutions was released a mere few months after Reloaded, and people were more than likely Matrix-ed out, regardless of perceived quality.
I did. Did you even go to school at all?And you went to school for this stuff?
What does?Seems like common sense to me.
Actually, if you can bother to read, Robert Scorpio first brought up The Matrix. My post immediately followed his.Not gonna bother dissecting your post but You're the one that brought the Matrix into the whole conversation not me.
You're the one saying that Dark City is better than the Matrix not me.
So no one is allowed to have their own opinion about a film being "good" or "bad" around here without being blasted for it... Nice. The adult response would be "I disagree", not "you're stupid for thinking so".
Anyway, I seem to recall Neroon saying way back there to stop derailing the thread with this petty argument.
Don't go trying to make me look like an idiot because your reading comprehension is so low you can't finish "Go, Dog, Do".Oh yeah, you are correct.
I got confused because you are the first one to make a stupid comment.![]()
Don't go trying to make me look like an idiot because your reading comprehension is so low you can't finish "Go, Dog, Do".Oh yeah, you are correct.
I got confused because you are the first one to make a stupid comment.![]()
You don't need my help, you're doing fine by yourself.![]()
Oh yeah, you are correct.
I got confused because you are the first one to make a stupid comment.![]()
That second sentence hardly seems like a complete thought...not to mention inaccurate. You seemed baffled to the point of catatonia when Robert mentioned that The Matrix stole ideas from Dark City. Don't go trying to make me look like an idiot because your reading comprehension is so low you can't finish "Go, Dog, Do".
Damn, I remember watching that on video in the early 80s....yeah, it was odd - but more than that, it was absolutely awful!Now .... "STRANGE Movies" ......
I seem to recall an odd film called "Laserblast". It wasn't terribly good, so maybe that's why it seemed so odd in the first place.
Yes. Yes they were. Absobloodylutely!"Titanic" was sci-fi? Okay, Kate Winslet's breasts were fantastic, but still....
Yet another pic I just happen to have already:In fact, the sanest, most mainstream of Terry Gilliam's (spelling error?) movies qualify as strange now that I think about it. Most all are worth watching, too. I mean, anybody who casts Robin Williams as a giant, disembodied head....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.