Author intent of TMP was that it was separate.Its a production with a certain intent which was realized for the sake of said production(
Author intent of TMP was that it was separate.Its a production with a certain intent which was realized for the sake of said production(
Author intent of TMP was that it was separate.
Its a production with a certain intent which was realized for the sake of said production(s) and its in-universe setting. not some make-up-your-own-adventure novel. The latter option is served by ST fan fiction (and more often than not, that does not work).
You do realize you're replying to an argument never made, right?
No. You can't state intent then state that intent doesn't count. That's a double standard.^ Grasping at straws. So-called "author intent" of was never explicitly an official, recognized part of the one ST film he had any influence over (whoops) and his go-nowhere thoughts on revisionist history were clearly ignored by those who knew the material better than he did (which happened more than a few times on TOS, go figure).

That's literally what the writers are doing when they sit down to break the stories of each season.not some make-up-your-own-adventure novel.
You do realize everything in Star Trek is absolute made up fiction, right?
Absolutely none of it is real; and any actual factual science portrayed is a stroke of luck.
What if Star Trek is real and we are fiction? A holographic reaction of a fake past were the real world was just a tv show people in our century enjoyed watching. Holographic Meta fiction!
Or a web series becoming more and more meta.What if Star Trek is real and we are fiction? A holographic reaction of a fake past were the real world was just a tv show people in our century enjoyed watching. Holographic Meta fiction!
Oh, the brain in a vat theory.*Or maybe humans created a holographic Star Trek program were the programs became alive because of AI which they then created a holographic past where their reality was a tv show, like mentioned. Now that we are alive we will someday create our own AI Star Trek meta universe and the cycle will continue on and on. We're just a program built by a program built by the real humans.
I stand by my opinion that the characters in TOS feel different than their film counterparts, and the refit Enterprise doesn't fit as an update to the TOS ship. It's too different for me, as different as Blake's in MASH.
Thank you for stating my point.Colonel Blake in the MASH movie is not the same guy as Colonel Blake from the TV show.

Oh, the brain in a vat theory.*
*2000 Internet points for those catching the reference.
Close but not quite.
Thank you for stating my point.![]()
I don't feel they are the same.TOS Kirk - same guy as TMP Kirk
I don't feel they are the same.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.