(Also, I killed Hugh off in Greater Than the Sum, but he's still alive in Picard.)
Oh?It didn’t remotely reconcile Discovery with the Prime timeline.![]()
All knowledge of the Discovery and the Spore Drive is suppressed...
Section 31 is restrained, and remains restrained until the Dominion War.
I love how this big, little surprise is a by-the-way thing related offhand in parentheses.
Well, the Klingons did conveniently pretend they never attempted to attack Earth, despite doing just that in Disco.Did the Klingons also promise to suppress their knowledge of the ship?
It has been twelve years.
How do you think that is going to work out, since more than a few folks were exposed to the Spore Drive? During its development, during its testing, during the war. D
The genesis device is discussed during a public high stake intergalactic meeting - how much is that used past the TOS movie period?
We know from DS9 that protomatter was used again. And just because it wasn't mentioned, doesn't mean someone didn't attempt to use it again at some point.
My guess is with Discovery now far in the future we won't see the 23rd century much now and that was there way of closing it out.
From everything I've seen Section 31 is supposed to take place in the 23rd century.![]()
I'm trying to recall, does Discovery still have its spore drive in the future? We may not have seen the last of spore drive, just in the 23rd century.
wot?!
Poor Hugh!
But why?
What did poor Hugh
Ever do to you?
![]()
I love how this big, little surprise is a by-the-way thing related offhand in parentheses.
Probably. I always assumed that bit in the inquiry scene in the finale where the faceless Admiral names Tyler the new director of Section 31 was meant to be setting up for the series.I wonder, will Section 31 pick up where Discovery left off?
I always assumed that bit in the inquiry scene in the finale where the faceless Admiral names Tyler the new director of Section 31 was meant to be setting up for the series.
This was like half a year ago, but one of the lead developers said they hadn't decided yet, but they are willing to retcon their own stories to try and fit with Picard.Have they said anything about what they're going to do about Star Trek Online?
Remove the word "occasionally," and you'd be right. Conan Doyle constantly contradicted himself, which is hilarious given that his main character was supposed to be hyperobservant and a stickler for detail, a quality his chronicler did not share in the slightest.Uh, Baum was the original source. And he frequently contradicted himself. Hell, Conan Doyle occasionally did so with Holmes, and it's with Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories that the word "canon" was first applied to a secular text.
Hikaru was first spoken on screen in Sulu's log entry at the top of Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.At any rate, when something out of a book is promoted to canon (e.g., Sulu's first name being Hikaru (somebody remind me of which movie the name was first made canonical in), or various bits and pieces from FJS's Technical Manual and General Plans made cameo appearances in TMP), it's special, and we should treasure it. When something out of a book gets contradicted by canon, it's commonplace to the point of being downright banal.
Which also made zero sense. They likely had thousands of candidates who had far more experience and had shown their loyalty to Starfleet.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.