Is this Idea solving evolution equation stable enough for papers?

[think]

Evolution of an organism --- is the integration from birth to death of a pre-evolved organism times the change in time as time approaches zero.??

So this of course can expand from one organism to a group of them being the same kind of organism or even life-cycle groupings of organisms and such.

yes or no would work as an answer maybe if you understand this definition you are evolved ,,, maybe.?

 

[intrinsical]

No

1) You can't define a mathematical formula in English. English is a lower tier of language that doesn't have enough preciseness.
2) There's insufficient detail as to how such a formula works. Chaos theory has to play a role in the formula too, as there will not be a proportional change in the state of evolution over time.

 

[think]

No

1) You can't define a mathematical formula in English. English is a lower tier of language that doesn't have enough preciseness.
2) There's insufficient detail as to how such a formula works. Chaos theory has to play a role in the formula too, as there will not be a proportional change in the state of evolution over time.

chaos is important to the evolutionary process but I would guess that it is averaged out of the equation where all the chaos is limited at infinity - so it would seem that chaos is a simple bump in the long run..

to integrate into the moment as I think is possible where epsilon is shrunk to nothing... zero where no time change occurs in that moment lets the sum of the value of life grow infinitely ,,,

This concept of "over time" where time change goes to nothing and all is all encompassing has no real meaning in the equation of life's evolution..

I will attempt to write this "idea" or concept in formal mathematics ,... for you ... thanks for the considerations

Bill

 

[Dryson]

Evolution of an organism --- is the integration from birth to death of a pre-evolved organism times the change in time as time approaches zero.??

So this of course can expand from one organism to a group of them being the same kind of organism or even life-cycle groupings of organisms and such.

yes or no would work as an answer maybe if you understand this definition you are evolved ,,, maybe.?

I would have to say that as each organism in the pre-evolved state maturates into adult hood, reproduces and then dies the integration of its self can be said to times the change of integration with another same species where each time that the subsequent generation from zero pre-evolved organism to the zero evolved generation reaches zero or the point where the life cycle of the integration is complete that the integration cycle might return to a state of pre-evolution with the pre-evolved organism meeting its former self from millions of years ago.

 

[think]

I would have to say that as each organism in the pre-evolved state maturates into adult hood, reproduces and then dies the integration of its self can be said to times the change of integration with another same species where each time that the subsequent generation from zero pre-evolved organism to the zero evolved generation reaches zero or the point where the life cycle of the integration is complete that the integration cycle might return to a state of pre-evolution with the pre-evolved organism meeting its former self from millions of years ago.

that should be possible soon..
very keen observation..

given the dynamics of a evolved pattern in a complex system even say thought patterns and then evolved thought patterns if the system is contained there will always be flux inside this system changes in growth and digression is possible but not likely, because there would be the "effect" of having already been done and the paradoxical dichotomies of two same state experiences.

example... the apple is eaten, the apple is eaten again... millions of years later.. but.. the organism that eats the apple a subset of the organism's group or society of like organisms leads to the subset of the life-cycle of this environment this .. environment is out of equilibrium due to lack of growth and as such the whole of that environment forming a one of one equation would then reform at a zero identity. This can leave the apple as not the evolved apple but the evolved apple thus causing a cascade of evolution throughout the whole of the environment's life cycle.

remember we are in a closed system where matter is neither created nor destroyed... mostly

so all the things in the closed system effect the balance and equilibrium of the whole system.

 

[gturner]

Does that concept have any commonality or congruence with the postmodern essay generator?

 

[think]

Does that concept have any commonality or congruence with the postmodern essay generator?

Have you ever thought that the time cube is so farcically detailed that the social reality it creates is .. such intense newspeak propaganda as it becomes the social reality (as a realism or almost pseudo realistic idea) of the neo-elites in their loss for real or timelessly true ideas and meaning? errrrr no right? I am perpendicular within the time cube as it is nothing.

-this is bill newbold-

on topic:--

yep there really is no way to post this from this public computer but I can create that equation in grapher..

ok this

 

[Tom Hendricks]

Everything is holograms, but in the end it doesn't even matter.

 

[think]

Everything is holograms, but in the end it doesn't even matter.

I am a brick - laid as the foundation series of probabilities.. the hologram was made then made solid.. ,,, I will not NOT go into the details unless you would have me summon the devils of detail here and now??? Why do I bother with this hologram that thinks the end does not matter.. since that post is really... at the level of spam nonsense... no no there is individuality in these ideas. <NOT>
It is like the commonality idea where everyone exists as everyone ,,, hahahahahaah I am not the Buddha, ever and as well Christ let them kill him but that is not going to happen again,,, or to me, us we, yep and or them.. and those types.

Aside from the creative expositions above,, there is no science in these idea forms. Just the general spam associated propaganda ,,, and such...


__________________________________________________________________
back on topic:

One moment can be sliced frame to frame into a kind of blend where that frame size/cycle is lost in an analog bath of self-awareness.. common to the idea is new.. the new ideas are common but these are direct proofs in logic like p implies q,, ad infinitum where inductive reasoning of reverse recursion involves the solution before we get there. yep..



this is the attempt to sove these ideas of evolution ... but of course there is more then this ... since I remember first,.. have this equation in the 95-97 after having solved Fermat's Last theorem based on what knowledge Fermat would have when he wrote ... this.

//aside
applying the basic idea of calculus of variations (vary the parameters with a whole number) then... set up the series that later cancels from the center out.,, and or cascades at the center of the series...out leaving an inequality that is distributed over the whole peramatized variation series.,, which allows for the proof to be applied to the whole numbers of n..
aside I put this in an aside form because Famat would of like that.//

this lead to new forms of mathematics based on the cancellation series.. and in turn solves three point gravity equations .. exactly.

I kid you not... but ,,,

with evolution as a mere linear development in the above definition.. (right?)

the manifolding of dimensions needs more considerations and development.

OK?

 

[gturner]

You seem to have a beautiful mind. I can't quite follow the logic though. You might want to focus on evolution as a stochastic or deterministic process.

 

[Robert Maxwell]

Have you tried discovering a smooth function in the eigenvalues of Sobolev spaces? That's where I'd start.

 

[scotthm]

I'm really amazed that this thread has been allowed to linger for so long. What's the point?

---------------

 

[Robert Maxwell]

I'm really amazed that this thread has been allowed to linger for so long. What's the point?

You could contribute something to it. Otherwise, stay out.

 

[gturner]

The point is in seeing connections between things you wouldn't think are related, such as space and time and fashion. For example, if you change the size of your closet space by dS, how does that affect how long it takes you to pick out an outfit (Tp)? Obviously there is some function relating dS and Tp, but this is also affected by the social environment and the size of the accessible fashion space, which can both expand or contract over time, and part of that time is consumed in picking clothes out of your closet, which is affected in turn by closet size, leading to a very complex equation for the time estimate of how long it will take to get dressed.

 

[intrinsical]

Why is it an integral? gtuner's suggest of using a stochastic process is a good one.

 

[think]

Have you tried discovering a smooth function in the eigenvalues of Sobolev spaces? That's where I'd start.

Using the Banach–Tarski paradox in the Sobolev space, not only can eigenvalues and there following vector equations be smoothed but within the yes-no paradox outside of quantum probabilities there infinite-ness is never lost. I think.

//aside
The development of Eigenvalues was done in about the 1950's, the person who did the research and set up their constructs and manifold forms drilled me on them in 1983 while he drove me to work, he was a mathematician for the government while I had just finished diff-eq's in 1983 in an engineering major and working as an engineering assistant. At the time I believe he was working on the optical drivers for cd's to store and retrieve data. They had me in all sorts of conferences with the engineers and scientists back then... later I switched to a music major.
aside//

A fractal type equation (partial dimensional definitions) applied to eigenvalues or their uni-molecular equivalents is nicely solved in typical Banach spaces L,b mmmm I will try to recreate that equation later on the mac grapher program for posting. OK? (real tangential thoughts usually have perpendicular axis's)

A three way 'paradox' might explain what is occurring in typical Sobolev manifolds and those kinds of spaces but there is no positive negative zero separation in the new (what?) paradigm - spaces and dialectical "thoughts" never open out or in but are also never really stable. So smooth functions just wrap around the center of themselves in a pebble pond rippling effect, more-so like an open void of chaos or I think of this as mush or mashed potato like gelatin bodies.

Just as with probability and then into the analysis of these probable statistical realms things are things without any justifiable reason to explain the way they are... just numbers... ,, which is good and bad but beyond this, is the chaos of supersymmetries and new ideal thought experiments in information and in theoretical information equations.

(ok I am not reading this again for content because I would just add to it.)

 

[Dryson]

given the dynamics of a evolved pattern in a complex system even say thought patterns and then evolved thought patterns

Humans are designed around microscopic processes consuming the even smaller bits of energy around it. Basically like a Paramecium.

Similar systems came together and combined into two like systems where each benefited from the other. One cell had the ability to ingest large amounts of food but did not have the necessary systems to fully digest or dispose of the food. The second system had the ability to digest large amounts of food had a nice system to digest the food but did not have a proper system to dispose of the large intake of food.

Both systems communicated,thought, between their cells on how to tweak both systems to better define a singular unit that was more efficient than both separately. As the thoughts of the cells re-arranged their biological systems they spawned new types of cells that contained both of them in one cell. The new cells found other new cells and like the original two cells that joined came together once again.

Now the four cells that were united had the ability to ingest large amounts of food or energy, the ability to digest the entire amount of energy taken in as well as disposing of the left over amount of energy over time.

The new Quadra-Cell with its tri level of conceptive processes then began to add smaller bits of information to its own cellular mechanism such as calcium that had been collected from the ingestion of food into a stable array of limbs that it was then able to use to move around allot faster with to catch larger prey. Eventually the mass of cells pushed through the embryonic sack to create the human that we see today where billions of lines of DNA taken from each early cell has been used to re-arrange the energy taken in to produce a structure that would serve the purpose of all cells contained within the human body.

If humans did not evolve then does our body like the paramecium have hair that is very sensitive to the touch and direct our basic instincts of feeding in the direction that the sensation came from?

But the real question is where did the original thought that sparked the first two cells to merge come from?

Was the thought out of curiosity, divination or necessity?

 

[Robert Maxwell]

Cells don't "think" anything. Their interactions are governed solely by physics and chemistry, not some sort of free will (or deity, for that matter.)

 

[think]

Cells don't "think" anything. Their interactions are governed solely by physics and chemistry, not some sort of free will (or deity, for that matter.)

Very true Robert they are governed by synaptic processes that have been developed not just over a life time of over the life time of that species...

given the dynamics of an evolved pattern in a complex system even say thought patterns and then evolved thought patterns

Humans are designed around microscopic processes consuming the even smaller bits of energy around it. Basically like a Paramecium.

Similar systems came together and combined into two like systems where each benefited from the other. One cell had the ability to ingest large amounts of food but did not have the necessary systems to fully digest or dispose of the food. The second system had the ability to digest large amounts of food had a nice system to digest the food but did not have a proper system to dispose of the large intake of food.

Both systems communicated,thought, between their cells on how to tweak both systems to better define a singular unit that was more efficient than both separately. As the thoughts of the cells re-arranged their biological systems they spawned new types of cells that contained both of them in one cell. The new cells found other new cells and like the original two cells that joined came together once again.

Now the four cells that were united had the ability to ingest large amounts of food or energy, the ability to digest the entire amount of energy taken in as well as disposing of the left over amount of energy over time.

The new Quadra-Cell with its tri level of conceptive processes then began to add smaller bits of information to its own cellular mechanism such as calcium that had been collected from the ingestion of food into a stable array of limbs that it was then able to use to move around allot faster with to catch larger prey. Eventually the mass of cells pushed through the embryonic sack to create the human that we see today where billions of lines of DNA taken from each early cell has been used to re-arrange the energy taken in to produce a structure that would serve the purpose of all cells contained within the human body.

If humans did not evolve then does our body like the paramecium have hair that is very sensitive to the touch and direct our basic instincts of feeding in the direction that the sensation came from?

But the real question is where did the original thought that sparked the first two cells to merge come from?

Was the thought out of curiosity, divination or necessity?

//aside - (sorry) -
It is known that thoughts are as much an illusion as this is an illusion...
aside//

The original merger of the two(companies) cells,, was via the law of attraction! relative to each unite respectively...

So should I discuss the idea of attraction here? No - but I could

 

[gturner]

A synaptic process would require synapses, which are found in nerve cells, and those arose much much later in evolution. Cells sticking together is very common, even among bacteria, because it allows them to stick in a clump in a good spot, with the outermost cells facing most of the hazards. But that doesn't get you a multicellular organism, it gets you goo, because the cells don't differentiate in a predetermined pattern, they just clump. Their cellular machinery and DNA isn't sophisticated enough to encode dozens or hundreds of cells types and form those different types in a sophisticated sequence and layout. For that, you need homeobox genes, allowing an organism to become something like a jellyfish.