No one needs to prove anything except for the person making claims (that's you, by the way) and so far you have been very unconvincing.
Interesting Ideas on FTL Travel
- Thread starter Dryson
- Start date
- Status
At least he finally posted something that wasn't a copy/paste or on the level of "what if c.a.t. = d.o.g.?".
Sounds like the mentality of someone who is 40 years old with the intellect of a ten year old.
No one needs to prove anything except for the person making claims (that's you, by the way) and so far you have been very unconvincing.
It's obvious that you as well as doing the same thing southerner is caught in your own trap and thereby putting the blame on someone else because you yourself cannot even understand what is being said except for to copy and paste what someone has already said.
Gödel was an idiot and so to are those who profess that by wrapping words around and around that time travel can be achieved by using quantum eraser methods to hopefully wipe the persons mind clear using words to replace them with what you want someone to think.
Its also obvious the both of you do not even understand the basics of science but can only use words to try and make someone angry to then say that the person who pummels your ass in the face was as fault because you constantly incited them to hit you. Such people are commonly known to be mentality retarded.
Now where are your advanced degrees in physics to say that you are 100% proof positive that I am wrong?
Sounds like the mentality of someone who is 40 years old with the intellect of a ten year old.
No one needs to prove anything except for the person making claims (that's you, by the way) and so far you have been very unconvincing.
It's obvious that you as well as doing the same thing southerner is caught in your own trap and thereby putting the blame on someone else because you yourself cannot even understand what is being said except for to copy and paste what someone has already said.
Gödel was an idiot and so to are those who profess that by wrapping words around and around that time travel can be achieved by using quantum eraser methods to hopefully wipe the persons mind clear using words to replace them with what you want someone to think.
Its also obvious the both of you do not even understand the basics of science but can only use words to try and make someone angry to then say that the person who pummels your ass in the face was as fault because you constantly incited them to hit you. Such people are commonly known to be mentality retarded.
Now where are your advanced degrees in physics to say that you are 100% proof positive that I am wrong?
We're waiting on something remotely convincing. You haven't provided it. Don't think that there is no future in amusing everyone, though.
Message sent just recently to Dr. Erselius at the Max Planck Institute.
Dr. Erselius,
I have a question regarding sub space and the Virtual Particle. Since a Virtual Particle comes into existence for various amounts of time and takes on the characteristics of a particle that it comes into contact with is the Virtual Particle able to be said to come from sub space?
Sub Space - A space inheriting all characteristics of a parent space. Based upon the definition the space that the virtual particle comes from is a space where the particle inherits the characteristics of the particles from the parent space, parent space being normal space where particles come into being and remain for longer durations and do not inherit characteristics of other particles that the particle comes into close approximation with.
Back of hand under chin flaunted your direction.
Dr. Erselius,
I have a question regarding sub space and the Virtual Particle. Since a Virtual Particle comes into existence for various amounts of time and takes on the characteristics of a particle that it comes into contact with is the Virtual Particle able to be said to come from sub space?
Sub Space - A space inheriting all characteristics of a parent space. Based upon the definition the space that the virtual particle comes from is a space where the particle inherits the characteristics of the particles from the parent space, parent space being normal space where particles come into being and remain for longer durations and do not inherit characteristics of other particles that the particle comes into close approximation with.
Back of hand under chin flaunted your direction.
Some Frequently Asked Questions About Virtual Particles
What are virtual particles?
One of the first steps in the development of quantum mechanics was Max Planck's idea that a harmonic oscillator (classically, anything that wiggles like a mass bobbing on the end of an ideal spring) cannot have just any energy. Its possible energies come in a discrete set of equally spaced levels.
Its possible energies come in a discrete set of equally spaced levels.
Levels of energy that have a topmost level, then a second level, a third level, fourth and so forth. Each level beneath the first being a sub-level or sub-space of the parent level.
It would be interesting to discuss riding a ship between two levels like a rail car with an overhead EM rail and a lower Rail that would provide the forward propulsion necessary for momentum to take place.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Quantum/virtual_particles.html
To go with duck -- sweet side and a soup?
I'm making duck for Thanksgiving (thanks to you 'hounds, I've got my roasting pan and have a good idea how to use it) and I have a question.
I had originally planned for a roasted winter squash soup as a starter and maple glazed sweet potatoes as a side. My husband doesn't like either of those, so now I'm substituting redskin potatoes in with some other roasted vegetables.
I'd like to have a soup, though, and preferably another side dish that's a little sweet. Anyone have a rec on what would go well with duck?
- Howzabout baking chunked carrots and sweet potatoes and pitted prunes in butter, honey and a touch of fresh ground cinnamon. If your hubbie is specifically anti-sweet potato it would still work.
- Great ideas about the carrots. I have some sweet carrots from the farmer's market last week that I wanted to use. Wonderful!
-Maybe sweet/sour side?
Braised red cabbage with apples & caraway seeds?
Raspberry vinegar- braised onions?
Wild Rice with wilted Nappa Cabbage slaw, flavored with sherry vinegar & sage?
As for soups- Shame about the butternut squash soup disinclination- I usually dislike squash myself, but I really appreciate a good pumpkin or b-nut squash soup. Maybe try a celery root & leek Vichysoisse?
What are virtual particles?
One of the first steps in the development of quantum mechanics was Max Planck's idea that a harmonic oscillator (classically, anything that wiggles like a mass bobbing on the end of an ideal spring) cannot have just any energy. Its possible energies come in a discrete set of equally spaced levels.
Its possible energies come in a discrete set of equally spaced levels.
Levels of energy that have a topmost level, then a second level, a third level, fourth and so forth. Each level beneath the first being a sub-level or sub-space of the parent level.
It would be interesting to discuss riding a ship between two levels like a rail car with an overhead EM rail and a lower Rail that would provide the forward propulsion necessary for momentum to take place.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Quantum/virtual_particles.html
To go with duck -- sweet side and a soup?
I'm making duck for Thanksgiving (thanks to you 'hounds, I've got my roasting pan and have a good idea how to use it) and I have a question.
I had originally planned for a roasted winter squash soup as a starter and maple glazed sweet potatoes as a side. My husband doesn't like either of those, so now I'm substituting redskin potatoes in with some other roasted vegetables.
I'd like to have a soup, though, and preferably another side dish that's a little sweet. Anyone have a rec on what would go well with duck?
- Howzabout baking chunked carrots and sweet potatoes and pitted prunes in butter, honey and a touch of fresh ground cinnamon. If your hubbie is specifically anti-sweet potato it would still work.
- Great ideas about the carrots. I have some sweet carrots from the farmer's market last week that I wanted to use. Wonderful!
-Maybe sweet/sour side?
Braised red cabbage with apples & caraway seeds?
Raspberry vinegar- braised onions?
Wild Rice with wilted Nappa Cabbage slaw, flavored with sherry vinegar & sage?
As for soups- Shame about the butternut squash soup disinclination- I usually dislike squash myself, but I really appreciate a good pumpkin or b-nut squash soup. Maybe try a celery root & leek Vichysoisse?
Dryson, you do know that cutting and pasting content from other sites without accrediting the source is against board rules?
Bud, "QED" is a term which basically means "this demonstrates the point I was making." The OP underscores it every time he writes something.
It's okay ... he's starting to remind me of Gollum.
Dryson, you're posting claims that go against a lot of what's already known. If you want to convince anyone, the burden of proof is on you. That's how debate works.
And you'll have to post your degree before we believe you have more knowledge of physics than some people here.
And then you'll have to post your qualifications to know more history and biology than anyone. This follows making such claims as "a cellular split occurred that evolved man from woman" and that the dinosaurs got from one continent to another by using huge underground tunnels.
And then you'll have to prove that you actually know how to use a roasting pan.
It's okay ... he's starting to remind me of Gollum.
Dryson, you're posting claims that go against a lot of what's already known. If you want to convince anyone, the burden of proof is on you. That's how debate works.
And you'll have to post your degree before we believe you have more knowledge of physics than some people here.
And then you'll have to post your qualifications to know more history and biology than anyone. This follows making such claims as "a cellular split occurred that evolved man from woman" and that the dinosaurs got from one continent to another by using huge underground tunnels.
And then you'll have to prove that you actually know how to use a roasting pan.
Eh, it's probably another one of SkinofEvil's accounts
First time ever I have been called a luminary. I'm just moderately shiny.
Last edited:
Yeah, don't post unattributed quotes from other sites here, and especially when they aren't even relevant (like the duck part.)
This thread needs to chill out or it will be closed very soon.
Sub Space - inheriting all characteristics of a parent space. Based upon the definition the space that the virtual particle comes from is a space where the particle inherits the characteristics of the particles from the parent space, parent space being normal space where particles come into being and remain for longer durations and do not inherit characteristics of other particles that the particle comes into close approximation with.
This would make the Virtual Particle part of sub-space because it comes from a space that contains particles that come into and go out of existence. In normal space there are only particles that come into existence and then go out of existence that do not create particles that exhibit all of the characteristics of the particle being mimicked. This means that a particle that mimics another particle must come from sub-space where other interactions cause it to come into and go out of existence in the first place and have not been discovered yet but can be likened to electrons jumping to a higher orbital.
There has never been a particle in normal space that exhibits the type of behavior that a Virtual Particle does.
This would make the Virtual Particle part of sub-space because it comes from a space that contains particles that come into and go out of existence. In normal space there are only particles that come into existence and then go out of existence that do not create particles that exhibit all of the characteristics of the particle being mimicked. This means that a particle that mimics another particle must come from sub-space where other interactions cause it to come into and go out of existence in the first place and have not been discovered yet but can be likened to electrons jumping to a higher orbital.
There has never been a particle in normal space that exhibits the type of behavior that a Virtual Particle does.
Last edited:
He's taking the mathematical definition of subspace, assuming it must mean the same thing as the s.f. definition, tying it to his belt, and jumping off the deep end.
Sorry to tell you this, Dryson, but your chain of logic is coming unraveled and it's the only thing holding you up.
On the other hand, a while back I asked him to explain the assumptions he operates from. (They didn't seem to be the same as other people's.) I give him credit for doing that here. Seriously.
Sorry to tell you this, Dryson, but your chain of logic is coming unraveled and it's the only thing holding you up.
On the other hand, a while back I asked him to explain the assumptions he operates from. (They didn't seem to be the same as other people's.) I give him credit for doing that here. Seriously.
On the other hand, a while back I asked him to explain the assumptions he operates from. (They didn't seem to be the same as other people's.)
An assumption is an opinion. An opinion does not have to be the same as other peoples because an opinion has not been proved as fact therefore based off of your post everyone else with the same assumption or opinion does not have the credentials to prove or disprove my assumption because their logic is based entirely off of assumption that has been proven fact by someone else and they would therefore not have the ability to reason outside of the box. Because to reason outside of the box makes the others in the box feel less about what they do not know but want everyone to think the same opinion to make them feel better about not knowing.
An assumption is an opinion. An opinion does not have to be the same as other peoples because an opinion has not been proved as fact therefore based off of your post everyone else with the same assumption or opinion does not have the credentials to prove or disprove my assumption because their logic is based entirely off of assumption that has been proven fact by someone else and they would therefore not have the ability to reason outside of the box. Because to reason outside of the box makes the others in the box feel less about what they do not know but want everyone to think the same opinion to make them feel better about not knowing.
Dryson, you haven't shown that you even know where the box is.
Okay, I guess that's the end of "giving credit." I don't want to know what your assumptions are anymore.
Okay, I guess that's the end of "giving credit." I don't want to know what your assumptions are anymore.
- Status
Similar threads
