"Nemesis" never had high stakes? Earth was going to be wiped out. Data got killed. The stakes of "Insurrection" really did play like a mid-season drama that wouldn't even qualify for a season finale during TNG. Basically the equivalent of a species-of-the-week that would never get revisited again.I didn't feel NEM really had stakes... I might have felt that way if the film had focused on the actual Romulans and had avoided built-in reset buttons...
I've been reading my brother's Star Trek Communication magazines during that era and Michael Piller and Rick Berman had some insightful interviews about the follow up to FC. In the Piller interview he mentioned the movie was in the vein of the book "The Heart of Darkness" but the movie was nothing but. It would be interesting to see a rogue Starfleet person abandoning his principles for a whole new way of life which in return turns that person insane, but the movie doesn't go there... well maybe it does since it's clear Picard and crew are 100% wrong in aiding the Ba'ku, and should've been considered renegades after this debacle. What a strange movie?Insurrection felt like a weak NG episode. It is too bad that a NG movie budget was wasted on this script. I would have rather seen one more NG movie after Nemesis.
Remember at that time when there were all rumours that Star Trek IX was going Heart of Darkness (with a Starfleet Admiral or Data 'going Kurtz') I had only recently discovered and was pretty obsessed with Apocalypse Now (buying the VHS, soundtrack cd, choppers at sunset poster)and was actually studying Heart of Darkness as part of my course/degree so the thought of Trek doing its version of that was very exciting. it also made sense that Patrick Stewart would be up for Trek adapting classic highbrow literature stuff (drawing comparisons to Moby Dick-TWOK/FC, Hamlet-TUC). but anyone whose read MPillars making of book can see how the original HOD pitch/plot got slowly eroded mainly as PStew of all people wanted to lighten it up after the dourness of Gen/FCI've been reading my brother's Star Trek Communication magazines during that era and Michael Piller and Rick Berman had some insightful interviews about the follow up to FC. In the Piller interview he mentioned the movie was in the vein of the book "The Heart of Darkness" but the movie was nothing but. It would be interesting to see a rogue Starfleet person abandoning his principles for a whole new way of life which in return turns that person insane, but the movie doesn't go there... well maybe it does since it's clear Picard and crew are 100% wrong in aiding the Ba'ku, and should've been considered renegades after this debacle. What a strange movie?
Remember at that time when there were all rumours that Star Trek IX was going Heart of Darkness (with a Starfleet Admiral or Data 'going Kurtz') I had only recently discovered and was pretty obsessed with Apocalypse Now (buying the VHS, soundtrack cd, choppers at sunset poster)and was actually studying Heart of Darkness as part of my course/degree so the thought of Trek doing its version of that was very exciting (drawing comparisons to Moby Dick-TWOK/FC, Hamlet-TUC). it almost made sense that Patrick Stewart would be up for all that highbrow literature stuff being adapted into Trek (but then anyone whose read MPillars making of book can see how the original HOD pitch/plot got slowly eroded into what we got)
Yet it can still hold your attention ten times better than Nemesis.
I certainly could have done without both boob jokes.
From what I recall Patrick Stewart hated the Piller's first draft of Insurrection. He wanted it to be lighter. Brent Spiner and Piller also clashed during the filming. Spiner wanted Piller to rewrite a scene so Data's dialogue would be switched with that of another character's but Piller flatly refused. The behind the scenes creative differences are more interesting than the film.
I'm not sure. Stewart's complaints are well documented and Spiner's anecdote comes from the Michael Piller documentary on the TNG season 3 bluray.I've heard a lot about this book. Where does one get a hold of it?
I wanted to start the picture off with Picard at the Academy and we see what a rowdy young man he was" Piller said "He's really not the same Picard we've grown to respect and admire. So we show him in a relationship with one of his best friends, who gets him into trouble. We bring Boothby back to get him out of trouble and answer that great Star Trek question that was set up in the series about Boothby's history with Picard, and what trouble he did get into."
"Then we would flash foward to the future, where Starfleet sends Picard on a mission 'up in the river' to a strange unknown galaxy. There he finds his old friend who has seemingly gone berserk, striking ships, and creating all kind of havoc in the Neutral Zone. So Picard is forced to go off after his oldest friend, and when he gets there, he discovers his friends looks exactly the same way when we saw him in the opening sequence. It's then revealed that this planet has a magical younthful affect on the habitants. When Picard discovers his old friend has discovered a conspiracy to steal this planet from the people who lived there, ultimately Picard joins him to fight the good fight. At the time I think it was against the Romulans."
"At that point, Rick started losing confidence in the story," Piller said "His biggest problem was he felt Patrick would have a serious problem with the fact that Picard didnt get to be a true hero and that he wouldn't get to swashbuckle until he turned into a young man. And what you're basically saying there is, your lead character is an old man. When I heard that, I had a hard time arguing."
"Nemesis" never had high stakes? Earth was going to be wiped out. Data got killed. The stakes of "Insurrection" really did play like a mid-season drama that wouldn't even qualify for a season finale during TNG. Basically the equivalent of a species-of-the-week that would never get revisited again.
"Nemesis" never had high stakes? Earth was going to be wiped out.
Supposedly, but with the bad guy being (younger!) Evil Twin (heck, TWO Evil Twins!) it was pretty hard to take seriously.
Re: the Ba'ku being too idealized, I thought it was initially nice that Picard and Anij had a strong mutual respect while having very different worldviews but then later on it seemed too much like Picard was kind of abandoning his own, very much admiring hers more, and the romance also felt at least excessive, it would have been a lot better if there had just been more of the mutual respect.
What do they have in common other than a green planet setting??This movie was slightly better when it was remade as Star Trek Beyond.
Star Trek: The Karaoke Experience...A cringeworthy moment in Star Trek history.
Insurrection is the annoying "easy listening" song of the TNG Movies. The one you hear in the store. You know, the one that was on the Top 40 in 1972.
Nemesis is that annoying nu-metal song where the "singer" keeps screaming and you can't understand a single EXXXXX-TREEEEEEEM!!!!!! thing he's yelling over blaring guitars that sound more like chainsaws. "YEAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!" "DISTOOOOOORTED!!!!!!!!! Dis-dis-DISTOOOORTED!!!!!!" "EXTREME!!!!!!!"
I did the same and agree.I sat through the whole thing when it premiered in theatres. Thought the same thing then. Once was enough!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.