Binary thinking in that it is either this approach or nothing at all, there is a middle road, you know. Abrams could have done anything, and being a businessman first and foremost, he chose the LCD approach. Fair enough, that makes sense from a view driven purely by profit, but it has its limitations.
I think you misunderstood me. I know they could have taken it in any direction from a story standpoint. But they didn't want to. They wanted this direction. And given they were the only ones who were interested in doing any Trek at all, we could have had this version or nothing. They've said they wouldn't have done it if they couldn't tell
this story. So, from a fan's perspective it is quite binary. And not falsely so.
Perhaps my view on the movie is wrong, if so, could you please enlighten me as to the philosophical message of the movie? From what I have heard from those who have seen it, it is rather hard to determine what that is, or it is barely detectable. If the storm and stress actually accounts for something, and it is "alot" as you have stated, what exactly is "it"?
Look, it's not Plato. But it
is more than a series of explosions hung on a bullshit plot. More importantly, it's about the characters we know and love. You're not going to learn anything new about yourself or the human condition watching this movie. But that almost never happened in TOS anyway for all its lofty accolades.
If you're a Trek fan, you'll gain a new insight into the characters you love. If you're not, there's lots of shit that explodes. Maybe the next film will tackle something deeper? For this one, I didn't care.