• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

If night rider why not star trek

compyx86

Ensign
Newbie
IF the new moves does as well as everyone thinks its going to, if a major net work picked up night rider witch stinks why now redo star trek on a major net work
 
Because I don't think there's anyone who really WANTS to make episodic Trek anymore.

The idea well is still pretty dry.

Give it another decade.
 
CBS, which controls the TV side of Trek, would need a lot of incentive to produce a new Trek series. I think a key component will be an increasing interest in the franchise. If XI does well and the increased interest for Trek is quantifiable, then you might see something created on their end sooner rather than later.

The mind of a TV Exec. is a curious thing though. Not always logical from a fan/tv viewer's perspective. We'll have to wait and see at this point.

…and I agree the Knight Rider remake is terrible. With them, I believe NBC was able to keep that show on air despite terrible ratings due to the contracts they had with the makers of the products they were pimping in the episodes (the cars). I doubt that show will be around much longer.
 
Last edited:
In my opinion Trek should stay off television at this point, stay off the ratings wars, the weekly struggle to get an audience and all that crap.

IF Trek XI is good and successful and somewhat renews interest in Trek, they should first do a couple more sequels before considering a new TV adventure.
 
In my opinion Trek should stay off television at this point, stay off the ratings wars, the weekly struggle to get an audience and all that crap.

IF Trek XI is good and successful and somewhat renews interest in Trek, they should first do a couple more sequels before considering a new TV adventure.

I agree; although, I foresee a new non-canon cartoon series like the one that came out shortly before Batman Begins.
 
All CBS would have to do is turn Star Trek into a crime drama and it'd fit right in with their lineup.

CSI: Bajor

Klingon Minds

Without a Warp Signature Trace

SCIS: Starfleet Criminal Investigative Service
 
All CBS would have to do is turn Star Trek into a crime drama and it'd fit right in with their lineup.

SCIS: Starfleet Criminal Investigative Service
I was going to say something similar myself.

and SCIS is almost a half decent idea.
 
In my opinion Trek should stay off television at this point, stay off the ratings wars, the weekly struggle to get an audience and all that crap.

IF Trek XI is good and successful and somewhat renews interest in Trek, they should first do a couple more sequels before considering a new TV adventure.

If Star Trek returns to the small screen, also it should stay in the future... I mean 24th or beyond. Star Trek is too big to make prequels out of as Enterprise already saw. Prequels for Star Trek may prove fruitful on the big screen however, as it already is being shown (highly debated topic)
 
If Star Trek returns to the small screen, also it should stay in the future... I mean 24th or beyond. Star Trek is too big to make prequels out of as Enterprise already saw. Prequels for Star Trek may prove fruitful on the big screen however, as it already is being shown (highly debated topic)

There was/is nothing wrong with the premise of Enterprise. It is a great premise. Where the series failed miserably was in it's execution. It's failure does not prove the prequel concept invalid in any way.

I for one was bored to tears with the 24th C shows and won't miss it at all if we never see it again.
 
With no home...

150 survivors....

one the journey...

...to find Earth!

Crap...voyager already did the BSG thing...and failed.
 
Episodic TREK is in hibernation for the forseeable future. If the new movie is a huge hit and there is enough of a clammor for new TV episodes, we *might* get a new series in the next few years. But it'll be handled differently than it was in the 90s when you had TNG, DS9 and VOY all on within a year of one another and ENTERPRISE premiering just a handful of years later. Oversaturation is something the studio no longer wants.
 
Episodic TREK is in hibernation for the forseeable future. If the new movie is a huge hit and there is enough of a clammor for new TV episodes, we *might* get a new series in the next few years. But it'll be handled differently than it was in the 90s when you had TNG, DS9 and VOY all on within a year of one another and ENTERPRISE premiering just a handful of years later. Oversaturation is something the studio no longer wants.

Until it gets profitable again.
 
Oversaturation is something the studio no longer wants.

If they believe it'll make money, they Want it. If it makes money, they want More of it. Whatever the it may be, they'll do, for love of money.

Over-saturation is a Hollywood specialty. Every studio dreams of a property they can push and sell to the point of over-saturation and beyond. Or else they hope to recycle a past success (like Trek) and raise the tent pole again.
 
Episodic TREK is in hibernation for the forseeable future. If the new movie is a huge hit and there is enough of a clammor for new TV episodes, we *might* get a new series in the next few years. But it'll be handled differently than it was in the 90s when you had TNG, DS9 and VOY all on within a year of one another and ENTERPRISE premiering just a handful of years later. Oversaturation is something the studio no longer wants.

Until it gets profitable again.

I thought there was all kinds of interest in a new animated series? Last year this time we had a few concept sketches of a 25th century starfleet uniform. Whatever became of that?

From what I understand, an animated series is far less expensive than a live action TV show.
 
IF Trek XI is good and successful and somewhat renews interest in Trek, they should first do a couple more sequels before considering a new TV adventure.

I agree 100 %. I would like to see more Films In this time period. Provided they left it open for that by not having Kirk take command of the enterprise yet. I think another series attemt would only make things allot worse for the franchise.
 
Episodic TREK is in hibernation for the forseeable future. If the new movie is a huge hit and there is enough of a clammor for new TV episodes, we *might* get a new series in the next few years. But it'll be handled differently than it was in the 90s when you had TNG, DS9 and VOY all on within a year of one another and ENTERPRISE premiering just a handful of years later. Oversaturation is something the studio no longer wants.

Until it gets profitable again.

I thought there was all kinds of interest in a new animated series? Last year this time we had a few concept sketches of a 25th century starfleet uniform. Whatever became of that?

From what I understand, an animated series is far less expensive than a live action TV show.
There was initial interest, and there was supposed to be such a series in development, but nothing much has been heard about it for a couple of years now.

http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Untitled_Star_Trek_animated_series
 
I wouldn't mind a CLONE WARS-style CGI animated show that could reuse some of the established actors like Shatner, Picard, Frakes, et. al. A USS TITAN series on Cartoon Network perhaps? Troi and Riker's post-2379/NEMESIS adventures on their ship?
 
Re: If Knight rider why not star trek

Star Trek is a religion. It is complete with its own schisms, fundalmentalists, "reformists", Centrists, Corruptors, etc...

As with all religions, bringing about change is met by various responses by all factions. But with this new film, it is seen as the Central Church Authority (Paramount) being corrupted by its own greed for profit.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top