Only if you ignore the economic realities that storing set pieces that big costs $$$ because you can't use the storage space for anything else. They built that full mockup of the Millennium Falcon for TESB, stored it for 3 years, pulled it out for a single (deleted) scene in ROTJ, and then chainsawed it, probably because no one wanted to pay to store it for a maybe-use years or decades later.You'd think the Star Trek powers that be would have realized by now that there are always new series and new opportunities for flashbacks, so they should be putting sets into storage, not destroying them.
This may be too Babylon 5, but how about a whole new set of characters on an entirely new station called Deep Space Nine (or some other new name with Bajor now 15 years a Federation member), and everyone’s got their own lives and current crises. No mention of the originals save for a holophoto plaque commemorating the earlier station on the new promenade or ops.
Because IDGF about feasibility? News flash: this isn’t a production meeting, and there will likely never be any more DS9. Make up whatever you want....so long as it’s interesting in some regard lolWhy?
Heck I'd watch a Siddig-starring S31 series before a Michelle Yeoh fronted one. Alexander Siddig's acting has improved 100x since DS9, and his character hasn't crossed any insane moral event horizons like committing genocide or eating the flesh of sentient humanoids.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.