• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I prefered Nemesis

Status
Not open for further replies.
THAT sounds really douchy. Of course it couldn't be because it's actually a good movie. We're all "sheep".

Christ.

People are allowed to like this movie in the same way that I am entitled to prefer Nemesis. It's just pretty obvious that Trek fans are more likely to jump on the train for something that is a mainstream hit. Star Trek is "kewl".

You do realize liking stuff just because it is "kewl" usually stops after adolescence? Do you really think all the people posting here that are in the 30-50 age bracket love a movie because it is pronounced "kewl"?

And he thinks we're sheep, too.
 
THAT sounds really douchy. Of course it couldn't be because it's actually a good movie. We're all "sheep".

Christ.

People are allowed to like this movie in the same way that I am entitled to prefer Nemesis. It's just pretty obvious that Trek fans are more likely to jump on the train for something that is a mainstream hit. Star Trek is "kewl".

You do realize liking stuff just because it is "kewl" usually stops after adolescence? Do you really think all the people posting here that are in the 30-50 age bracket love a movie because it is pronounced "kewl"?
Well, "Kewl" or not Nemesis "Socked"
 
THAT sounds really douchy. Of course it couldn't be because it's actually a good movie. We're all "sheep".

Christ.

People are allowed to like this movie in the same way that I am entitled to prefer Nemesis. It's just pretty obvious that Trek fans are more likely to jump on the train for something that is a mainstream hit. Star Trek is "kewl".

You do realize liking stuff just because it is "kewl" usually stops after adolescence? Do you really think all the people posting here that are in the 30-50 age bracket love a movie because it is pronounced "kewl"?


Quite aside from that, I don't see how "oo" (as in fool) becomes "ew" as in "fuel".
 
Because sheep will be sheep

THAT sounds really douchy. Of course it couldn't be because it's actually a good movie. We're all "sheep".

Christ.

People are allowed to like this movie in the same way that I am entitled to prefer Nemesis. It's just pretty obvious that Trek fans are more likely to jump on the train for something that is a mainstream hit. Star Trek is "kewl".

It's current. It's relevant. Of course people are going to defend it because chances are you're going to find more people in here who actually like it as compared to people who don't. The reviews and box office receipts speak for themselves and show that it's not just fans being "sheep".

Coming in here and calling everyone that is like walking into a block party, shitting in the punch, and then insulting everyone because the punch bowl isn't big enough for said shit.
 
People are allowed to like this movie in the same way that I am entitled to prefer Nemesis. It's just pretty obvious that Trek fans are more likely to jump on the train for something that is a mainstream hit. Star Trek is "kewl".

You do realize liking stuff just because it is "kewl" usually stops after adolescence? Do you really think all the people posting here that are in the 30-50 age bracket love a movie because it is pronounced "kewl"?


Quite aside from that, I don't see how "oo" (as in fool) becomes "ew" as in "fuel".

"ew" as in "fuel" is only pronounced that way in some places. In New York "ew" in "New" is pronounced "Noo" as are a lot of other "ew" words.
 
I'm not specifically citing Nemesis but I'm kind of agreeing with the OP to say that up till now I've hung on every word of Trek. I watched this new film all the way through just because it was Trek. I might like the next one, when they settle in, but this one was unengrossing. Some good moments but it felt like they were just shoehorning Trek names and references into a run of the mill sci fi film (complete with heavily American accented villain). Should have been made for TV.

The accent that bothered me (and boy did it bother me) was one of the Vulcan children taunting Spock. Extremely pronounced American accent. Cringe.
 
THAT sounds really douchy. Of course it couldn't be because it's actually a good movie. We're all "sheep".

Christ.

People are allowed to like this movie in the same way that I am entitled to prefer Nemesis. It's just pretty obvious that Trek fans are more likely to jump on the train for something that is a mainstream hit. Star Trek is "kewl".

You do realize liking stuff just because it is "kewl" usually stops after adolescence? Do you really think all the people posting here that are in the 30-50 age bracket love a movie because it is pronounced "kewl"?

You don't need a degree in psychology or marketing to understand why this movie is a hit. The promotional budget alone was probably more than Nemesis' production budget. Paramount executives chose to promote this film as a summertime tentpole unlike the past 2 Trek movies which were catered to a niche market. Plus, this movie features an "it" producer/director... hot sexy bodies, lots of explosions, and a weak plot that could be understood by preschooler's.
 
You do realize liking stuff just because it is "kewl" usually stops after adolescence? Do you really think all the people posting here that are in the 30-50 age bracket love a movie because it is pronounced "kewl"?


Quite aside from that, I don't see how "oo" (as in fool) becomes "ew" as in "fuel".

"ew" as in "fuel" is only pronounced that way in some places. In New York "ew" in "New" is pronounced "Noo" as are a lot of other "ew" words.

Yes, I know that different countries, regions and dialects of the same language, have different phonemes. I was having a go, as "kewl" drives me batty. Anyway have to go do an exam in an hour or so, funnily enough, a large chunk of it will be language cognition.
 
People are allowed to like this movie in the same way that I am entitled to prefer Nemesis. It's just pretty obvious that Trek fans are more likely to jump on the train for something that is a mainstream hit. Star Trek is "kewl".

You do realize liking stuff just because it is "kewl" usually stops after adolescence? Do you really think all the people posting here that are in the 30-50 age bracket love a movie because it is pronounced "kewl"?

You don't need a degree in psychology or marketing to understand why this movie is a hit. The promotional budget alone was probably more than Nemesis' production budget. Paramount executives chose to promote this film as a summertime tentpole unlike the past 2 Trek movies which were catered to a niche market. Plus, this movie features an "it" producer/director... hot sexy bodies, lots of explosions, and a weak plot that could be understood by preschooler's.


But who can forget Nemesis' complex plot of "evil, long-lost twin". :rolleyes:
 
You do realize liking stuff just because it is "kewl" usually stops after adolescence? Do you really think all the people posting here that are in the 30-50 age bracket love a movie because it is pronounced "kewl"?

You don't need a degree in psychology or marketing to understand why this movie is a hit. The promotional budget alone was probably more than Nemesis' production budget. Paramount executives chose to promote this film as a summertime tentpole unlike the past 2 Trek movies which were catered to a niche market. Plus, this movie features an "it" producer/director... hot sexy bodies, lots of explosions, and a weak plot that could be understood by preschooler's.


But who can forget Nemesis' complex plot of "evil, long-lost twin". :rolleyes:

Even Nemesis (which admittedly is more of an action flick than an intellectual sci-fi movie), still introduced a somewhat thoughtful notion of nature vs nurture. It wasn't groundbreaking, but its better than a drunken/testosterone charged thug "enlisting" in the US Marines (oops I meant Starfleet).
 
The problem as I see it is simply this:

In Nemesis, we are asked to believe that someone that looks like a 17 year old kid is going to tangle and hold his own with a respected mature captain like Picard, AND we are asked to believe that this person IS Picard, only younger?

It just doesn't work. Like I said before, it may have worked on Paper, but it didn't transfer to the big screen. The sad thing is that there's simple things they could have done to fix this problem. For one, don't be pretentious in your introduction of the character. What was with the waiting 18hr or whatever it was, and then all the secrecy about who he is, even to the last moment when he slowwwwwwwwwly steps into the light for the big reveal that....gasp!......he looks just like Picard :rolleyes:. What was this supposed to prove? Was it some lame attempt at trying to convince the audience that this person was Picard's clone? Why is he bald? Why is he taking FOREVER to get shit done????

nuStar Trek did it the right way, Nero appears on screen saying "Hi Christopher, I'm Nero" bam!! the authority that scene had was amazing, like the guy was saying "Hi cockroaches, I'm Nero", and he doesn't waste any time, he lets all cannons loose almost immediately.

The whole time Shinzon was acting like a brat and emo beeyatch, I kept thinking back to the lines in TMP when Spock said "V'Ger is a child" and McCoy goes "well, what do you suggest we do, spank it?". That's how I felt the entire movie, Shinzon needed a good spanking. The rape scene just made him look even more like a creepy pervert, like the 17 year old in mom's basement with the terabytes of triple x rated material.

Nero on the other hand, even if the character wasn't fleshed out the same, actually felt like an adult. A whacko crazed nut who would stab you while you're looking at him, but adult none the less, and far more terrifying.
I would agree that they did shinzon really badly on screen. But just to be fair it is alot harder to portray a such complex character on screen. As oppose to simply acting crazy for Nero. Any one can play Nero, hell I can do Nero :klingon::klingon::klingon::klingon::klingon::klingon: grrrrrrrrrrr...

The difference between Shinzon and Nero is on the intend of the writer.
The writer tried to come up with a more complex villain, and I gave them props for that. While the writer for Nero just said hell lets not bother to come up with a good back story for him, let just paint him with tattoos, and have him act all mean and crazy.

If the choice is between a well thought out attempt at creating something smart, but ultimately failing.
VS
A lazy attempt to create something stupid. If stupid is what the writers intended then stupid succeeded.

I'll take a good try, over an insult to my intelligence any time of the day.

You are in the small population minority. Only one Trek movie ever has gotten near as good as critic rave as this one. Seems like the only people that hate this movie are very small amount of Trek fans.

Because sheep will be sheep.
Nemesis was a Berman produced Trek film released against the biggest movie of the year. It flopped... and Trek fans bitched about it's quality far more than they did after Insurrection came out.
7 years later, we have a hit. Many fans feel feel good about the fact that their love of Star Trek which has always been considered nerdy is now cool among the masses.
And we have yet another one who thinks he's "smart" because he doesn't like the film.:rolleyes: Outstanding.
And yet we see another one who thinks this movie is a well written, intellegent piece of master theaters. :rolleyes:

THAT sounds really douchy. Of course it couldn't be because it's actually a good movie. We're all "sheep".
Christ.
People are allowed to like this movie in the same way that I am entitled to prefer Nemesis. It's just pretty obvious that Trek fans are more likely to jump on the train for something that is a mainstream hit. Star Trek is "kewl".
Possum, I was a Trek fan before it was "cool" (1969).:guffaw:
The point is not whether you are a fan before its cool, the point is, now you feel vindicated and have alot more to talk about to your none trek friends, because it is now so cool.
 
People are allowed to like this movie in the same way that I am entitled to prefer Nemesis. It's just pretty obvious that Trek fans are more likely to jump on the train for something that is a mainstream hit. Star Trek is "kewl".

You do realize liking stuff just because it is "kewl" usually stops after adolescence? Do you really think all the people posting here that are in the 30-50 age bracket love a movie because it is pronounced "kewl"?

You don't need a degree in psychology or marketing to understand why this movie is a hit. The promotional budget alone was probably more than Nemesis' production budget. Paramount executives chose to promote this film as a summertime tentpole unlike the past 2 Trek movies which were catered to a niche market. Plus, this movie features an "it" producer/director... hot sexy bodies, lots of explosions, and a weak plot that could be understood by preschooler's.

there were a lot of movies that had even bigger marketing budgets that crashed and burned.

shrugh what ever..
i liked it..
most of the people i personally know and that i value the opinion of really liked it or loved it.
the vast majority of critics liked it or loved it.
it probably had the greatest number of stellar reviews have seen in a long time.
 
It just seems to me that a lot of Trek fans would be bitching and moaning about things if this film wasn't a commercial hit. People called the sexuality of Seven of Nine and T'Pol desperate and out of place. Yet all of the adolescent garbage found in this film is magically embraced.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top