• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I officially began my journey through all Star Trek on October 9th...

Own the Vic...love the Vic....

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
What's that? A good Harry Kim episode?

Oh my. The visual effects in Timeless are unlike anything I've seen on any of the shows prior to this. The crash-landing scene was surprisingly great for 18-year-old CGI.

LeVar Burton appears as Captain LaForge, Seven gets drunk and hilarious... even with the over-reliance on nonsense time travel, one of the best episodes of VOY yet? I think it's up there.

Timeless is a strong if not the strongest candidate for "best" Voyager episode. For so many reasons. It was great seeing Levar Burton back as Geordi. Plus Burton really shows himself to be one of Star Trek's best directors with the episode. (Why didn't they give him a movie?). The crash sequence may be the single franchise best effects moment. I don't think it has ever been equaled in later offerings such as Enterprise? At least not on TV. Timeles itself is a near perfect episode. It's only negatives are more with the series itself. For whatever idiotic reason they will later attempt to essentially reuse or recycle many of the main plot elements in another prominent episode. It's a controversial and widely disliked one. Timeless suffers for being unintentionally blended with it.
 
A favourite of mine. Whenever Quark starts talking about humans, you can bet it'll be good.

I've been saving this until you reached this point to avoid spoiling anything. But Chuck over at SFDebris has a great review of the episode, along with what is probably the most succinct comparison between Picard and Sisko and a brilliant description of The Defiant. He does humorous tongue in cheek ST and SF reviews and has largely worked his way randomly through the Trek shows. (His take on Janeway is amusing.)
http://sfdebris.com/videos/startrek/d558.php
Be warned NSFW language
 
I really enjoyed it.

My only problem is with Chakotay and Harry wiping out 15 years of history. Do they really want to be back stuck in the Delta Quadrant that bad after all those years? Could they really not have just moved on and made a new life for themselves? Seems inconsistent with the characters I know from the past and kinda sad.

Oh, and future Harry's hair is truly awful. Enough to make me reconsider my stance on the episode :lol:

There is one detail that Harry as well as Chakotay of the future did not consider and that's in order to make that second past possible they along with Chakotay's girlfriend had to die! That's what I have a hard time to believe. Real people are rarely willing to die in order for other people to live. It happens though, but it's extremely rare. Here they seem to make that decision at the drop of a hat. But here not only did they renounced to live they also condemned to oblivion countless people that were born or saved from accidents in this reality that will not be born or will have those accidents in the other reality. I think that that is the main reason why what harry and Chak were doing was outlawed in the Federation.
 
Since Tom's now been demoted to ensign (character development, hooray!), can someone please promote poor Harry Kim?

.

Or strange character loves never mentioned before or again? Like "Tom loves The Sea!!?,"

As for Tom and Harry's rank... Sigh!
No, Tom ends the series outranking Harry. Harry stands as the longest serving and unprompted Ensign in Starfleet history. Even Reg Barley made Lt. Comander. So yes the repeat felon gets promoted and demoted and promoted again past Harry Kim several times. Even better I think Harry ends up getting more time in the brig... For having sex with an alien babe. Nope, no other deeper reason. No prohibitions. No weird complications. Harry is the only officer in Starfleet history to be charged and jailed for sex with a hot alien. You don't touch what's Janeways without consequence!

Put this in perspective. In the time we see Harry as an Ensign, Nog goes from illiterate street rat to Academy Cadet to Ensign to full Lieutenant earning several field promotions and is a decorated war hero. We even get a glimpse of him as the last Captain of the Defiant. And Harry? Is still Harry.

As I have said Karma says in order for James T Kirk or William Riker to exist there must by nature be Harry Kim to balance the scales.
 
I really enjoyed it.

My only problem is with Chakotay and Harry wiping out 15 years of history. Do they really want to be back stuck in the Delta Quadrant that bad after all those years? Could they really not have just moved on and made a new life for themselves? Seems inconsistent with the characters I know from the past and kinda sad.

Oh, and future Harry's hair is truly awful. Enough to make me reconsider my stance on the episode :lol:

Remember these questions. Tuck them away and save them for the end, after Nemesis. Some of what you ask may be answered. But more likely you will have far far more questions along these lines.

Oh and speaking of Time Travel and Janeway, did anybody notice the magic macguffin in timeless? The reveal that the Borg can talk to each other through time? Yeah! Puts things in perspective doesn't it? The Borg have met Janeway. The Borg can crank call the past much like Eric Cartman stuck in the 25th century. Puts Best of Both Worlds and First Contact in perspective does it not? Now just imagine how much fun the Federation is going to have when the rest of the Delta Quadrant eventually catches up with the Borg in order to enact their vengeance upon the dreaded destroyers of worlds, the Voyagers. (No really think it through. List of Delta Quadrant species friendly or prone to look favorably on Janeway? Neelix's Hedgehog people. List of those who consider themselves at war with the cursed ship of damned souls? Everybody else. )
 
I mostly agree with what you say about Insurrection, but you did miss one key motivation. and that's the "nobody has to die, they just have to move next door, and get to keep their powers". No that was sort of the point. By leaving the planet the Baku loose their immortality. They age decay and die. Just like everybody else. They become the Sona. It's removing the elves from the Magical Tree that gives them immortality (and cookies! Can't forget the cookies!). I'm not excusing the mess that is Insurrection. Just pointing out that they did have some badly explained moral questions buried within the trash heap of bad boob jokes and Klingon Acne. (They brought Michael Dorn back from playing a fully fleshed out and noble warrior on DS9 for this? At least in First Contact they let him butcher a Borg.)
 
the point of the story was not that 600 settlers would be inconvenienced.
It was that you don't fuck over a minority fir the sake of a majority.
As Picard said, at what point become thise actions immoral?
At 6000? At 6 million?
Can you put a number on an immoral action that still let's you rationalize it?
And there is another issue that was completely ignored for the plot.
Harvesting the planet's rings would make it uninhabitable, right?
That is not just the Ba'ku's fate on the line but a whole planets eco system with a rich and diverse number if life forms probably in the billions if the planet is anything like Earth and it looked very much like it.
How nobody even mentioned that us beyond me.
This movie suffers from low budget and small scope syndrom.
It should have been the Avatar of the Star Trek franchise.

But anyway. I treat it as an extension of the tv show these days and that makes it more enjoyable.

Oh, and what did you say earlier about Paris controlling a shuttle with a joystick again?
 
Picard on the big-screen has to be dumbed down and short-tempered like an emotional teenager (or horny teenagers in the cases of Riker and Troi), despite being 60-years-old.
It seems like Picard is made into an action hero for all 4 of the TNG movies.
 
It seems like Picard is made into an action hero for all 4 of the TNG movies.

He even makes a fool of himself in Nem when he drove like a lunatic and trespassed on that planet. Thus breaking the prime directive for no reason and behaving like a thug to boot.
 
Insurrection is my least favourite TNG film, though Nemesis isn't much better. The plot just isn't that strong, and it's filled with adolescent humour.

Initially when I was younger (14 when I saw it at the cinema) I laughed, but it still paled in comparison to First Contact.
 
Insurrection is my least favourite TNG film, though Nemesis isn't much better. The plot just isn't that strong, and it's filled with adolescent humour.

Initially when I was younger (14 when I saw it at the cinema) I laughed, but it still paled in comparison to First Contact.

It's amazing what we let them get away with.
 
Star Trek: Insurrection

4/10

Insurrection is a film that's about something. The hard part is having to pin that something down.

This is the ninth film in the Star Trek series and the third TNG film. Picard, Data and the crew of the Enterprise-E are back in action as they go out to save the selfish and spoiled Ba'ku from the more logical and forward-thinking Son'a (along with Starfleet... yes, Picard is going against orders to save these Ba'ku assholes).

What I don't get is the motivations of any of these characters or the premise itself. None of it makes any sense. The episode, Journey's End, was brought to my attention after watching the film. In Journey's End, Picard is ordered to remove Native American settlers from the colony of Dorvan V to be turned over to the Cardassians. Picard, without question, willfully follows these orders and urges the colonists to evacuate to a nearby homeworld. When they refuse, he even prepares to transport the colonists to the Enterprise by force. Eventually, the Cardassians and the colonists come to a solution that does not involve Picard changing his stance on the subject, the Enterprise leaves the planet, and they move on to other adventures.

In this "film", Picard and the crew rebel for reasons I just don't understand. The Ba'ku come across to me as a self-centred, egocentric race. I was actually empathizing with the Son'a throughout the movie, they're the good guys in this film. The Son'a are there to survey the planet with Starfleet and try to find a peaceful way to get the Ba'ku settlers off the planet so they can use their almighty "fountain-of-youth" powers and share it across the galaxy, giving new life and eternal youth to billions of Federation citizens. For Picard, Riker, Data and the rest of the idiots on the Enterprise-E though, the comfort of 600 settlers on the Ba'ku planet are more important than the lives of billions of Federation citizens. No one even has to die, it's not a trade-off, the Ba'ku just have to move to another world. It's not like they'll lose their powers or anything, they literally just have to move next door.

But Prime Directive says "you can't interfere with the natural evolution of a planet and its people", or something like that. This is much different though. Despite the different crews of the different shows breaking this rule time and time again, it's a serious offence here. I don't remember it being a serious offence when Picard tried moving those colonists by force in Journey's End? Why is it so revolting here? Has Picard been taking funny meds? Did someone tamper with the Enterprise's replicators? That's really the only explanation I can come up with for the characters' downright idiotic motives and actions since All Good Things.... What am I supposed to get out of this? It feels like a movie that's preaching about something, but what? If someone asks you to share your incredible powers of immortality so that billions of others can benefit from them, shoot them until they fuck off?

There's a lot of other things I could complain about. It feels like a crappy two-parter from season 7, for one, and has nowhere near enough scale or interesting ideas to build a movie around. It's boring. The holoship makes no sense whatsoever. Did they run out of money for the ending sequence? Why is The Collector just a big blue-screen set? Picard is back again shooting and romancing, because for some reason, Picard on the big-screen has to be dumbed down and short-tempered like an emotional teenager (or horny teenagers in the cases of Riker and Troi), despite being 60-years-old. And yeah, yeah, they give a throwaway line for this that the radiation is making everyone act more rebellious with the exception of Data, but that's a load of crap. I'm not taking that excuse!

As for the good things, the actors did their jobs I guess. I liked Patrick Stewart as I do in everything else he does, LeVar Burton had a very nice scene when his vision returned (and it's probably the only thing I can remember him doing in the whole film), and the guest stars are all well-cast. The opening theme, Ba'ku Village, is gorgeous. Unfortunately, the rest of Goldsmith's score is fairly bland and forgettable. I don't think Frakes is a bad director, the production values are a bit sloppy but he knows how to make a movie, the problems here lie solely in the writing. The strange thing is that Michael Piller, the writer of this film, is the same guy that's responsible for the turnaround in season 3 of TNG and the many great seasons that followed, this is the same guy who wrote The Best of Both Worlds Part I & II, he created DS9 and VOY. How did he miss the mark by so much in Insurrection?

Another hit and miss, but mostly miss, entry into the TNG film franchise. How disappointing.


Well one difference between "Journey's End" and INS is that in the case of the former it was a UFP world and UFP citizens, in INS the world was settled before the UFP was even founded so the UFP had no claim on the planet just because it fell within their sphere of influence, the Ba'ku weren't UFP citizens. The Ba'ku had something the UFP wanted but rather try and negotiate for it they decided to come in and engage in acts such as Kidnapping, forced relocation, theft etc...
 
Well one difference between "Journey's End" and INS is that in the case of the former it was a UFP world and UFP citizens, in INS the world was settled before the UFP was even founded so the UFP had no claim on the planet just because it fell within their sphere of influence, the Ba'ku weren't UFP citizens. The Ba'ku had something the UFP wanted but rather try and negotiate for it they decided to come in and engage in acts such as Kidnapping, forced relocation, theft etc...

The more I read about INS the less sense it makes to me. The resource the Baku were taking advantage of clearly belonged to the federation; The relocation wasn't done for any other reason than to save their lives and yet it is presented like a bad thing, an evil deed even.

Sort of: "Look he's giving that dying guy CPR! What an evil bastard!"
 
How did the resource belong to the Federation? The Ba'ku settled on that world before the UFP was created. Therfore any and all resources belonged to them not the UFP.

Besides another plot hole re: the Son'a is that we are dealing with a planet here, couldn't they have been, I don't know exiled to the other side of the planet?
 
Besides another plot hole re: the Son'a is that we are dealing with a planet here, couldn't they have been, I don't know exiled to the other side of the planet?
Wasn't there a line in the movie where the Son'a leader said they weren't content to stay on the planet. They wanted the benefit that the particles they were going to harvest would give them without having to stay there. They wanted to "have their cake and eat it too".

I don't consider the Son'a the good guys in this, no matter whether the Baku had the right to keep their "fountain of youth" to themselves or not. Didn't the Son'a more or less conquer 2 other races to serve them? And they produced ketrecel white for the Jem Hadar during the Dominion War. Plus what the Son'a leader did to the admiral.
 
Last edited:
Star Trek: Insurrection

4/10

Insurrection is a film that's about something. The hard part is having to pin that something down.
It's about Picard rediscovering his love of Latin dance, obviously. The rest is just window dressing.

But Prime Directive says "you can't interfere with the natural evolution of a planet and its people", or something like that. This is much different though. Despite the different crews of the different shows breaking this rule time and time again, it's a serious offence here.
And (maybe this flew by you) the Baku are a warp-capable civilisation who are not even native to the planet!

Also note that the Baku are the standard beige boring space peasants that are an inescapable trope of TNG, DS9 and VOY.

(I do not dignify the Baku with that superfluous apostrophe. They do not deserve the sci-fi apostrophe.)

Did you at least laugh at the boob joke?
 
I just can't NEM seriously because of the face-stretching. In a series full of stupid-looking aliens, this was the stupidest yet. I don't think I've ever gotten all the way through this movie.
 
I just can't NEM seriously because of the face-stretching. In a series full of stupid-looking aliens, this was the stupidest yet. I don't think I've ever gotten all the way through this movie.

I think you're mistaking NEM for INS, it's the latter that has the weird face-stretching in it, not that it matters all that much as they are basically equally bad.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top