Re: I cannot believe what they have done to Janeway in the VOY relaunc
I know how, on the outside, it may look like sexism is at play here. But I think if you read more TrekLit, you'll realize that in the books, Star Trek is much MORE gender-equal than was ever demonstrated on screen.
For instance, the recent Destiny trilogy (the capstone of modern TrekLit) had, across four starships, two female captains and two male captains, as well as two female first officers and two male first officers. The central focus character for the whole thing was female. The President of the Federation was female. The Enterprise-E crew, in its most recent iteration, contained more female "regulars" than males. Can you say ANY of that about onscreen trek?
I mean, of course, sexism is far more than just a numbers game, but I think you'll find if you read on further that the same balance I describe in numbers is also true in character arcs, perspectives, and stereotypes (or rather lack thereof).
I'm a huge Janeway fan. It does seem to me that sexism is at work in killing off her character. That doesnt mean that I dont respect the views of several posters here who claim otherwise and/or that good things have come from her character's untimely demise.
I know how, on the outside, it may look like sexism is at play here. But I think if you read more TrekLit, you'll realize that in the books, Star Trek is much MORE gender-equal than was ever demonstrated on screen.
For instance, the recent Destiny trilogy (the capstone of modern TrekLit) had, across four starships, two female captains and two male captains, as well as two female first officers and two male first officers. The central focus character for the whole thing was female. The President of the Federation was female. The Enterprise-E crew, in its most recent iteration, contained more female "regulars" than males. Can you say ANY of that about onscreen trek?
I mean, of course, sexism is far more than just a numbers game, but I think you'll find if you read on further that the same balance I describe in numbers is also true in character arcs, perspectives, and stereotypes (or rather lack thereof).