There might be a point to this. Some characters still compare real food to replicated food, implying that for a long time, a lot of people were still used to eating real food.
We know from a story that Mile O'Brien grew up in a home with no replicator. From various stories and anecdotes, in the 24th century replicator ownership seems to be about fifty-fifty.
Can you have a "social revolution" where a high percentage of the populace doesn't have the very device that supposedly causes said "revolution?"
Once replicator use becomes real common after a century or so, most humans may have eaten only replicated food by then and wouldn't care.
Replicators make a lot of sense in a enclosed environment like a starship, however on a planet there would be more options for people on where to acquire food and items.
So, even in planetary homes where a replicator was present, would home's food
solely come from this device? Or would the people also obtain food other sources, to be consumed in the home?
Ben Sisko obviously know how to make food. Will Riker loves to cook.
Imagine: your basic needs for food, clothing, shelter, education, health, and entertainment are guaranteed.
Entertainment is a "basic need?"
[Guarantees] I can see where one of those would be that all humans would be decently fed, clothed and receive free and quality healthcare.
I don't imagine this being for "all," but instead for those who have no other options, someone who has encountered economic hard times. Society would catch them before they hit rock bottom, then get them back on their feet..
Some would interpret it as planetwide welfare, but it could also be seen as the logical result of an advanced, humanitarian government with an over abundance of resources.
Planetwide welfare would also be interpreted as an example of a system where people
couldn't support themselves without external assistance or where there is a collapsing economic system.
Now with a healthy economic model, welfare is un-necessary for the general population, only for a limited number of individuals.
And then Tom Paris ups the ante by stating humans did away with money in the 22nd century no less.
And this would be the same Tom Paris who said "
in warp flight no left or right," correct?
")