• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How easy is it actually to reverse engineer a UFO?

How Easy do you think it would be to reverse engineer an alien device/ship?

  • Impossible, get that Air Force sticker ready!

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Almost impossible, but will take decades/centurys

    Votes: 6 28.6%
  • Possible if tech level is near to us

    Votes: 8 38.1%
  • Easy as Star Gate has led us to believe

    Votes: 5 23.8%

  • Total voters
    21
First, you need to figure out the whole system. Existing terrestrial spacecraft uses some pretty toxic materials.
 
First, you have to know what kind of limbs the extraterrestrials have. If they are octopuses with a ten-finger hand at the end of each limb the controls could be hard to use..
 
Last edited:
Neutronium is a non material.. unless your ship is a neutron star which would make flying around the universe quite challenging to say the least.:biggrin:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutronium
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron-degenerate_matter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_star#Mass_and_temperature

A neutron star is so dense that one teaspoon (5 milliliters) of its material would have a mass over 5.5×1012 kg, about 900 times the mass of the Great Pyramid of Giza. In the enormous gravitational field of a neutron star, that teaspoon of material would weigh 1.1×1025 N, which is 15 times what the Moon would weigh if it were placed on the surface of the Earth.
 
After moving craft to remote bunker/lab....

Begin examining exterior at macroscopic scale, by passive means. Start with visible light, then move onto to other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Repeat process at smaller scale.

One thing you are looking for is a hatch that will give you access to the interior.
 
Aren't you the one who talked about programmable matter?
True but our ideas have moved on since 1960's Star Trek. Neutronium would go through a sudden phase change (actually explode) unless constrained by extreme pressure or gravity. Robert L Forward discussed encasing it in diamond but I'm not sure that would be strong enough to contain it. Nanoengineered materials seem much more versatile to me for constructing spacecraft hulls with the ability to make parts transparent, reconfigure them, toughen them, repair them and so on. Of course, this whole thread is really speculative fiction.

The term neutronium has been popular in science fiction since at least the middle of the 20th century, such as the Doomsday machine in Star Trek, or collapsium in H. Beam Piper's Terrohuman Future History novels. It typically refers to an extremely dense, incredibly strong form of matter. While presumably inspired by the concept of neutron-degenerate matter in the cores of neutron stars, the material used in fiction bears at most only a superficial resemblance, usually depicted as an extremely strong solid under Earth-like conditions, or possessing exotic properties such as the ability to manipulate time and space. In contrast, all proposed forms of neutron star core material are fluids and are extremely unstable at pressures lower than that found in stellar cores. According to one analysis, a neutron star with a mass below about 0.2 solar masses would explode.
Ref: Neutronium - Wikipedia

[astro-ph/9707230] The fate of a neutron star just below the minimum mass: does it explode? (arxiv.org)
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top