I didn't say it was. To repeat myself, the question of what was discernable under original broadcast conditions is an independent question, one that was already under discussion.That's not how canonicity is determined.
I didn't say it was. To repeat myself, the question of what was discernable under original broadcast conditions is an independent question, one that was already under discussion.That's not how canonicity is determined.
Remember, even 442m doesn't fit the SNW Enterprise engineering section or shuttlebay. There will be no magical, fixes everything number.
Not really. If we only ever saw the Engineering set extension from one angle, you could argue that the larger size is an optical illusion (even though that would have knock-on effects, like things that seem to be symmetrical not being so, or parts that looked centered in the ship actually being offset), but since the camera moves around, it "locks in" the actual size of the set.I know the cgi model for the engineering section is "larger" than it should be, but isn't that the sort of optical distortion you could create with camera lenses?
I know the cgi model for the engineering section is "larger" than it should be, but isn't that the sort of optical distortion you could create with camera lenses? Also, why don't we think the shuttlebay fits? haven't we only seen it through the doors from the outside?
We see inside them pretty often, and the interior is significantly bigger than the already-oversized TOS shuttle interior set, and the exterior seems to match that scale. There are orthos of the CG model, and I feel like I've seen a CAD drawing of the interior set that would let us figure it out, but it's not turning up. Either way, 7 meters long is definitely too little. Could be twice that.So how big are those shuttles meant to be? Has SNW ever said?
I agree. There are a lot of cues to indicate that.I'm sure the SNW shuttles are supposed to be the Class-F shuttles from TOS
Not should they care.the ONLY show that had consistant and real ship sizes was Enterprise. You would think since then 25 years ago, that the digital age would show nice and consistant ship sizes.. Nope. Matter of fact its even worse now than pre 2000.
Doug Drexler cared.. the rest of the people? not so much.
I like your content and wish to subscribe to your blog."James R. Kirk" was plainly visible. It's explicit in dialogue that Space Seed takes place in the 22nd century. And The Squire of Gothos is the 28th century.
There are dozens of things that fans can choose to ignore when they don't mesh with what later continuity established.
I'm not saying you have to accept that. The design intent for the ship at the time is clear and no one should pretend otherwise. As I said above, you've got options for how you want to handle it within the continuity of the show if you want to.
Exactly. Yes, it's a testament to how the design fired the imagination for many of us but the length of the ship is not important because it's not important to the story. If it was it would have been stated in dialog.I worked with video in the SD era and there's no way anyone was clearly reading that "Day of the Dove" text on a CRT TV. At best, you can infer some things if you stare at it, but you can't actually parse it.
I don't honestly care how big the ship is. If Jefferies said it was 947 feet, fine. Set for film and TV routinely wouldn't actually fit in the buildings depicted. It's all artifice.
I don't honestly care how big the ship is. If Jefferies said it was 947 feet, fine. Set for film and TV routinely wouldn't actually fit in the buildings depicted. It's all artifice.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.