Spoilers Hopes for the Third Season??

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by HaventGotALife, Jun 29, 2019.

  1. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    Star Trek is great at papering over things though. Or flat out ignoring them.
    Predictably.
     
  2. grendelsbayne

    grendelsbayne Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Location:
    Netherlands
    To be fair, wiki counts one of the male characters twice (as main character ash tyler and 'recurring' character voq), and there is more to the question than just who is officially a main character, since 'recurring' character Spock left several main characters in the dust this season. Personally I'd say 'Recurring' characters Cornwell and L'Rell also outshone at least one main character last season, too (Culber). And there's no denying that Burnham is very much a lead character, not an ensemble character - which Trek hasn't really had since TOS.

    Having said all that, however, I have to agree that for all the promotion and interviews that were done about how DSC would truly respect and embody diversity in a way that Trek hadn't done before, my initial reaction on seeing the show was they didn't go anywhere near as far as they said they were going to (and really only barely went further than other Treks had already) and it was all very disappointing in that regard. And the general make-up of the show's demographics haven't significantly changed since then.

    We can talk about a truly female dominated show when the season long 'guest' spot(s) goes to a woman(women) and Tilly doesn't get shunted to the background and Nhan or Reno or Detmer or Owosekun (or all of the above) actually get real parts - and even then, only if all of this isn't compensated by roughly equivalent developments for the male characters.
     
    SJGardner and Spot261 like this.
  3. saddestmoon

    saddestmoon Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    Location:
    New Zealand
    I’m looking forward to seeing new ship designs!

    :)
     
  4. XCV330

    XCV330 A Being of Pure Caffeine Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2017
    Location:
    jippers on a beach somewhere
    Seven of Nine.
     
  5. grendelsbayne

    grendelsbayne Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Still not the same that I recall. Though closer than most.
     
  6. Alan Roi

    Alan Roi Commodore Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Michelle Yeoh really gets a short shrift from some people. Seriously. IMO, A "truly female dominated show" doesn't respect or embody diversity any more than a male dominated one.
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2019
    Lord Garth likes this.
  7. grendelsbayne

    grendelsbayne Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Location:
    Netherlands
    1) I have no idea what Michelle Yeoh getting short shrift from some people has to do with the post you quoted. Though as an aside, I would've enjoyed Discovery much more than I have if it were a show about the USS Shenzhou as shown in the pilot, and that show would also I think have done somewhat better at living up to the showrunners' claims about diversity.

    2) I never said the mere act of making a show female dominated would be the embodiment of diversity. I said the showrunners made a claim that the show doesn't live up to, because its diversity is only barely more noticeable than the average Trek. That is also not just a question of character genders - I only made further remarks about gender in particular because that's the specific aspect of diversity that this conversation is about.

    3) Having only female dominated shows in perpetuity would be extremely bad for diversity. Having some female dominated shows in a field massively overrun by male-dominated shows can only be good for and respectful to diversity. The ideal is not 50/50 gender split for every show - it's to have shows that are allowed to be 60, 75 or 90% female (which are still fairly rare and have never yet existed in Star Trek in particular) just as often as other shows are allowed to be 60, 75 or 90% male (which are still extremely common).
     
    Hythlodeus and Awesome Possum like this.
  8. King Daniel Beyond

    King Daniel Beyond Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    A type 13 planet in its final stage
    It's okay, Alex Peters is still making Axanar. I doubt they'll have more than a single woman involved and they're killing off their POC Tony Todd too. You can even send them money to help support their efforts.

    :techman::techman::techman::techman::techman::techman::techman:
     
  9. Alan Roi

    Alan Roi Commodore Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Discovery is vastly more diverse than any previous iteration of Trek, by a large margin. But yeah, its not 90% aimed at a particular portion of the audience. Like most shows I watch, there's something for most people in the audience to get the largest numbers of eyes and provide a dynamic between different characters not just focusing on a particular demographic. I don't think Star Trek is going to grow effectively in the short term by splitting its productions into niche products for particular portions of its audience.
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2019
  10. Kpnuts

    Kpnuts Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 1999
    Those are main characters. And you know they are.

    I'm talking about secondary characters: Owo (went on an away mission, scenes in the mess hall), Detmer (lots of development), Airiam (had an entire episode dedicated to her) vs Brys and Rhys (literally nothing.)
     
  11. Kpnuts

    Kpnuts Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 1999
    Two wrongs don't make a right. Why not have a balance?

    Why count people like Kol, Mudd and Voq when you should be counting characters that arent on that Wiki page like...

    Owo, Detmer, Airiam, Dr Pollard, Amanda, Number One, most of the Enterprise bridge....?
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2019
  12. SJGardner

    SJGardner Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2018
    Location:
    In the center of Europe
    Am I missing something? I distinctly remember Detmer and Owo routinely being called bridge furniture on this very site.

    Somehow I'm not surprised in the least how, upon being pointed out how the main cast is majority male, the goalposts immediately get moved to include mandatory-line supporting characters and even single-appearance uncredited extras.
     
  13. BillJ

    BillJ History’s Greatest Monster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    Covington, Ky. USA
    What wrong? Other shows were made in a time where a male dominated cast was the norm. Now, more female oriented casts draw viewers. Just capitalism at work.
     
    fireproof78 likes this.
  14. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    Aug 10, 1999
    Proof sexism still exists and not just in the '60s, '70s, '80s, or '90s.

    Star Trek (2009) --> Main Cast: 6 male / 1 female --> Not a peep.
    Star Trek: Discovery Season 2 --> Main/Recurring Cast: 14 female / 11 male --> "Women are taking over!!!!!"
    Hypothetical Situation --> Main Cast: 6 female / 1 male --> Nuclear Meltdown!!!

    The character list for Season 2? Here it is below. Cast who appear in the opening credits are bolded.

    Female
    1. Burnham
    2. Tilly
    3. Georgiou

    4. Cornwell
    5. Amanda
    6. Detmer
    7. Owosekun
    8. Airiam (replaced by Nillson, keeping the gender composition the same)
    9. Nhan
    10. Reno
    11. Pollard
    12. L'Rell
    13. Number One
    14. Siranna

    Male
    1. Pike
    2. Saru
    3. Stamets
    4. Culber
    5. Tyler

    6. Spock
    7. Leland
    8. Sarek
    9. Rhys
    10. Bryce
    11. Linus

    The cast composition is more or less half-and-half (56% female, 44% male) but the front credits are still mostly male.
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2019
    PiotrB, antinoos and SJGardner like this.
  15. darrenjl

    darrenjl Ensign Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2018
    What would be more brave is to have no ships whatsoever. Technology has reached the point where ships, or at least the 'physicality' of a ship, a 'vessel', is completely superfluous.
     
  16. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    That doesn't make the show "female dominated" and I suspect you know that.

    As many have pointed out the cast is fairly balanced, with many male characters getting quite a bit of development. So, no, I don't see the issue, and even if there are more females on this show I am failing to see the problem.
     
    grendelsbayne likes this.
  17. Jadeb

    Jadeb Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2017
    With the BurnhamSuperSuit, they already are!
     
    saddestmoon and BillJ like this.
  18. BillJ

    BillJ History’s Greatest Monster Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    Covington, Ky. USA
    I'm not sure I could get into a Star Trek that wasn't dependent on ships to move the characters around. They are characters in their own right.
     
    saddestmoon likes this.
  19. Dukhat

    Dukhat Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland, USA
    And hopefully not designed by John Eaves.
     
    saddestmoon likes this.
  20. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    fireproof78
    Hopefully not as ugly as the Discovery.