Please cite some examples of these do-gooder angels from the Old Testament. I can't think of a single example. The one with the flaming sword (hint, hint) guarding Paradise wasn't very helpful or benovelent. The ones who dealt with Sodom and Gammorah certainly weren't. At best, you have some that just gave signs but didn't actually do anything to help anyone. Kind of like what Castiel did in the latest episode.
God *set* the angel with the flaming sword to guard the Tree of Knowledge. The angel wasn't operating on his own recognizance. And, since Adam and Eve had disobeyed and were being, essentially, evicted from Eden, the angle was nothing more than the guy making sure that they didn't get away with coming back and violating their punishment. The angel didn't do SQUAT -- he was just THERE. A&E were being banished for their sin.
Re. Sodom and Gomorrah: That was *GOD* that did the smiting. The angels were sent there to seek out Good People. Remember God's promise not to destroy the city if He found just TEN good people? Well, the angels *didn't* find that many good people. Only *one* family. Which the angles SAVED.
Yeah, it's generally taken that "the angel of death" slew the firstborn of Egypt -- but the Bible says "The Lord struck all the firstborn of Egypt" -- not that an angel did it. And, still, that was a punishment. Tuff -- you defy the will of God and there will be a smiting. You note that was also the LAST plague. Up to that point, all the plagues of Egypt had been nuisances and annoyances. They were also ignored. There comes a time when you have to take off your belt.
It was an angel who stayed Abraham's hand when he was going to sacrifice Isaac. It was an angel who cured Tobit's blindness. It was an angel who told Jacob to flee from Laban. And so on.
The thought that angels could DOUBT God, let alone continue to rebel, is solely a post-modern one, and typical of the modern (and Hollywood) mentality where sin is virtue and virtue is perverse. It's a quintessentially Hollywood idea that people who serially steal from strangers (e.g., credit card fraud) and live the lives of unrepentant libertines (here I'm thinking primarily of Dean and his "girl in every town" ideas) can be God's chosen heroes while Angels are "dicks with wings" and even doubt the existence of God themselves. Biblically, at least David (the classic example of Doing Bad Things) was constantly repenting for his sins, and was even punished repeatedly for them. Sam and Dean have no such guiding rudder, and revel in that.
Hell, the entire Old Testament is full of cruelty and deception not only by the angels but God himself. And to be honest, I have no idea how anyone can worship a deity who was duped into torturing one of his most faithful followers just to prove a point to his self-made worst enemy. Poor, poor Job.
Well, judging from how clear you are on what is actually written in the OT, and how open minded you sound about it, I don't really think it's necessary for me to argue any points.
That's what I love about this show. It inspires more discussion than just "Oh my gosh, they're so HAAAAWT!!"
Definitely. Gotta admit, though -- there's been more than one female guest star that had me watching the show with more interest.
I'm going to have to agree that the angels aren't "Hollywood," AJ. Though I can understand your frustration of wanting to see God's side depicted as a more positive force. I struggle with issues of religion and faith in my own life.
As do a lot of people. It's particularly hard in the world of fandom, where all the "cool kids" think you should be beyond all that stupid stuff. Sigh.
Bigots are bigots, no matter what robes they wear.
If I might ask, AJBryant, (assuming you're still around) what is it about this show that you do like?
Actually, most of it. I genuinely like the stories (especially the ones that seem somehow self-aware, such as "The End of the Book" -- I loved Sam and Dean's take on shipping. ["Do they KNOW we're... brothers?" "Yes." "Ick!"]) I also love things like the B&W horror movie homage. As a fan of the old Universal horror flicks, that just made me happy all over.
It's one of those things where I really like it, and I feel frustrated as -- for ME -- there are a few tweaks that could be made and it would be a REALLY GREAT (instead of just a REALLY GOOD) show. If they showed the angels as supremely powerful forces for GOOD (instead of angsty rebels themselves), for example, even though they were more or less uninvolved, I would be more happy.
See, I don't see a problem with angels being not to involved -- it's mankind's salvation at stake, so I expect mankind should be taking the forefront in the struggle, with the angels only stepping in when the field is seriously uneven by something REALLY bad taking place.
On the whole, I think they have the bad guys down quite well -- the whole mythology of the show is well developed and internally quite logical. I just wish there were actually differences between the angels and the demons, rather than seemingly both being cut from essentially the same cloth.
The 26 year old Dean in the pilot (whom I agree was charming and funny but incredibly obnoxious) seemed closer to the 17 year old Dean portrayed in "After School Special" which repeated last Thursday. Dean was a vulnerable bunch of exposed nerves hidden under too much bravado. When that local girl hit the nail on the head after she found him making out with the other girl in the closet, she hit a raw nerve that cut him to the quick. Him trying to hit on all the women was part of that bravado. At least that's my interpretation.
Agreed, very much so.
I was really surprised (and pleasantly so) that we find from that flashback that it was actually SAM who was more stable as a child, as it seemed at the beginning of the ep that Sam had problems with things and Dean was very copacetic and accepting of the sitch. Then we find that Sam has a handle on it, and Dean is the one who really can't cope. Very telling.
Tony