• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers General Disco Chat Thread

As has always been the case with this show, the performances are fine, it's the writing that is subpar. Adira particularly this year is just filling in the role of young and awkward that was left vacant when Tilly left.

Mary was honestly too old looking to play the wide-eyed newbie by season 2. They cast an actress in her early 30s to play someone who was supposed to be 22, and like a lot of redheaded people, she started visibly aging young.
 
Are you trying to be offensive? The term "actress" applies only to female performers. Blu del Barrio is non binary and Ian Alexander is male. Neither of them are actresses.

Actor = only for male
Actress = only for female

Actor/actress = for non-binary

I think that is really offensive to call non-binary person actor bcs it is designation for male. You need to use actor/actress designation to describe non-binary person: Non-binary or genderqueer is an umbrella term for gender identities that are neither male nor female‍—‌identities that are outside the gender binary.

But this is not topic about someones gender/sex declaration. It is rude and indecent to talk about someones feelings about their own sex/gender declaration, it is ther human and social right and it is not for discussion.

I am talking about how they are bad actors after watching 90s Trek. I respect that some other people don't think that, but I think that and I know that there are a lot of other people think the same.
 
Actor = only for male
Actress = only for female

Actor/actress = for non-binary

I think that is really offensive to call non-binary person actor bcs it is designation for male. You need to use actor/actress designation to describe non-binary person: Non-binary or genderqueer is an umbrella term for gender identities that are neither male nor female‍—‌identities that are outside the gender binary.

But this is not topic about someones gender/sex declaration. It is rude and indecent to talk about someones feelings about their own sex/gender declaration, it is ther human and social right and it is not for discussion.

I am talking about how they are bad actors after watching 90s Trek. I respect that some other people don't think that, but I think that and I know that there are a lot of other people think the same.
Actor can be used for either male or female. Nothing gender-specific about it.
 
Actor can be used for either male or female. Nothing gender-specific about it.

Yup. It’s put exceptionally well by Geena Davis in a quote that can be found here.

It feels obvious in the first moment, as she points out that “authoress” and “doctress,” are real, historical gendered terms that have completely gone away from our vocabularies.

And they’ve disappeared from the shared language because they’re needless outdated terms that pointlessly distinguish occupations by gender, and do so under a false, and exclusionary gender binary.
 
Last edited:
I think that is really offensive to call non-binary person actor bcs it is designation for male. You need to use actor/actress designation to describe non-binary person: Non-binary or genderqueer is an umbrella term for gender identities that are neither male nor female‍—‌identities that are outside the gender binary.
As already mentioned, "actor" is acceptable as a gender-neutral term, but if that bothers you, you could have said performer or thespian.

Besides, if "actor/actress" is your way of referring to a non-binary performer, why did you refer to Ian Alexander as an "actor/actress"? He's male, he can be referred to as actor and that will in no way be offensive.

EDIT: Okay, I've just been informed Ian Alexander is in fact non-binary, so I suppose the above crossed-out paragraph can be disregarded. The point I made in the first paragraph still stands.
 
Last edited:
Actor = only for male
Actress = only for female

Actor/actress = for non-binary

I think that is really offensive to call non-binary person actor bcs it is designation for male. You need to use actor/actress designation to describe non-binary person: Non-binary or genderqueer is an umbrella term for gender identities that are neither male nor female‍—‌identities that are outside the gender binary.

But this is not topic about someones gender/sex declaration. It is rude and indecent to talk about someones feelings about their own sex/gender declaration, it is ther human and social right and it is not for discussion.

I am talking about how they are bad actors after watching 90s Trek. I respect that some other people don't think that, but I think that and I know that there are a lot of other people think the same.
What you describe, i.e. separate masculine and feminine forms, is correct and progressive in many languages, but in English it is exactly the opposite. However strange and conservative it may sound to people to whom English is foreign, the gender-neutral form is the masculine form. Lost in translation.
 
We didn't get a preview scene for Episode 11 or 12 either, because they showed Picard Previews instead.

We probably won't get a Picard Preview Scene this week, because the Ready Room is going to focus on the Discovery Finale.
 
Discovery and it's Short Trek spin-offs are really disgrace for Star Trek franchise and philosophy by my opinion. And in next few days I will try to explain why I think that way dear forum friends.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top