• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

General Computer Thread

Looks Ok to me. In fact, it looks better than my desktop lol. I'm currently running a Ryzen 5 3600X and a GTX 1660 Ti and 32GB of Ram, which was a great upgrade for me considering what I had before. I think you should be good to go. Upgrading the ram is a good idea too.
 
Looks Ok to me. In fact, it looks better than my desktop lol. I'm currently running a Ryzen 5 3600X and a GTX 1660 Ti and 32GB of Ram, which was a great upgrade for me considering what I had before. I think you should be good to go. Upgrading the ram is a good idea too.

I think if I push the laptop ram to 64gig that will end up better then the desktop machine I use at the moment.
 
Having 64Gb of RAM is great. When I brought my desktop back in 2019, I had 32gb - but one of the upgrades I did a few years ago was to go to 64Gb (and more hard drive space and RTX 3060 graphic card). Running an i7-9700 chip. Not sure when I'll get my new desktop (as been thinking about). Want something with more 8 cores. Also looking getting 128gb of RAM for the new system (I make 3d art - so I need a power computer)
 
Yeah, you can never have enough Ram. Makes everything run smoother in general. When I had my old computer, I was maxed out at 8GB and it was painful. Felt like I was right at the limit for certain things and I'd often get glitches due to programs always needing more. And when you're living on the edge like that, any major program updates, such as the major Steam update last year, made me nervous.
 

Linux Mint 22.0 has been released, as usual it is available with the Cinnamom, Mate and Xfce desktop environments, Kernel version is 6.8.
Haven't installed it yet, will do so when I have the time.
 
I don't know if this is a bug or glitch but hitting ctrl+r in file explorer in windows 11 refreshes the window but also sometimes reveals a menu bar with options such as file and view like the old style file explorer. It doesn't seem to happen all the time and I am not sure what is triggering it.
 

Linux Mint 22.0 has been released, as usual it is available with the Cinnamon, Mate and Xfce desktop environments, Kernel version is 6.8.
Haven't installed it yet, will do so when I have the time.
I daily drive LMDE on my desktop, but I have regular Mint on my laptop. Unfortunately, the upgrade from 21.3 to 22 wildly borked, and after recovering everything halfway important from it with a live USB, I installed 22 MATE. I've never given MATE any love, and after configuring the panels to recreate the old GNOME 2 layout (since MATE is a descendant of GNOME 2) it's quite nice. Sometimes I'll switch the window manager over to Compiz just to get the wild effects like the Desktop Box.
 
I had a copy of Haiku that I tried to install on an old Acer laptop but almost every time I ended up with a screen and a giant padlock in the center with error message saying basically that I can't install this.
 
I daily drive LMDE on my desktop, but I have regular Mint on my laptop. Unfortunately, the upgrade from 21.3 to 22 wildly borked, and after recovering everything halfway important from it with a live USB, I installed 22 MATE. I've never given MATE any love, and after configuring the panels to recreate the old GNOME 2 layout (since MATE is a descendant of GNOME 2) it's quite nice. Sometimes I'll switch the window manager over to Compiz just to get the wild effects like the Desktop Box.
Updates from main versions always have been iffy, point releases never gave me problems but going from 21.x to 22.x will mean I'll reinstall the machines one by one, there's no hurry with it since 21.x will be supported until 2027. :)
 
Intel's latest Financial Troubles = Itanic 2: Electric Boogaloo "Now we're sinking the entire company!"


Intel announces cancellation of 20A process node for Arrow Lake, goes with 'external nodes,' likely TSMC
Ouch, another hit to IFS (Intel Foundary Services) credibility if their own Design Division won't use 20A and will likely go with TSMC.
So much for trying to deliver five nodes in four years
And if Intel's 18A Process Node was sooo good, why can't ArrowLake go on 18A?
Surely they didn't plan a design ONLY on 20A, and not have 18A design ready to go?
The fact that their own Design Team isn't using their own foundary speaks volumes.


Broadcom reportedly disappointed with Intel 18A process technology — spokesperson confirms evaluation is still in process
Too many defects, they need to work on it before ramping up to HVM (High Volume Manufacturing)
So much for playing catch-up with TSMC


Intel allegedly has 'stock availability issues' for Core i9-13900K and 14900K CPUs
Not surprised given the massive instability issues of Intel's own making.
The fact that they have to RMA so many units for DIY, OEM's, Enterprise customers, etc.
OUCH!


Intel could be removed from Dow Jones due to stark stock price drop: Report
Intel has been on the DJIA (Dow Jones Industrial Average) since the 1990's. Now it's getting removed for its horrible stock performance.
For the first time in 30 years, Intel's market capitalization has fallen below $100 billion, marking a significant drop from its peak in 2000.
This year alone Intel's stock has plummeted nearly 60% and the company is now the poorest performer in the prestigious DJIA index.
After the company announced a $1.6 billion loss for the second quarter its stock price dropped further to the lowest level among the index's constituents, prompting analysts to suggest that its removal is likely imminent.


Intel CEO will reportedly present plans to cut assets at an emergency board meeting — chipmaker may put $32B Magdeburg plant on hold and sell off Altera
So much for adding more fabs, and Altera was your FPGA acquisition that is now being pawned off.
-_-


Intel mulls spinning off its manufacturing division
Intel finds itself in a difficult position and may spin off the manufacturing division.
They should've spun it off years ago. But now it's not worth nearly as much as it used to be.
But tough times comes with tough calls.


If Pat Gelsinger is smart, sell off the Fabs, sell off Altera, stop expanding your Fabs at such a ridiculous rate.
You're literally spending yourself into oblivion, especially when you got the DUMB idea to rush out the 13th / 14th gen and look what you did to yourself.
The Instability issues along with numerous class action lawsuits that are coming your way is going to kill Intel.
 
So wonder why so many chips are coming off defective. Did they cut corners somewhere?
Oh, the stories to tell.

The 13th & 14th gen were not supposed to exist. They were not on the original roadmaps.

Raptor Lake & Raptor Lake Refresh literally popped out of nowhere over-night.
Some Bean Counter Up top pressed some engineers to do a hatchet "Copy / Paste" job to pump up the Frequency & Cache + more E-Cores.
It got approved & sent to manufacturing in ~ 1 year, what normally is a 4 year CPU validation process.

Now excessive voltages are frying their own ring-buses gradually in the short term. That's the leading theory that is.
We're talking > 1.5 V to the Ring Bus so that the P+E cores can be OCed right out of the factory to beat AMD's Zen 4
Low & Behold, MASSIVE Crashes & Blue Screens to the customer in < 1-2 years depending on how lucky you were.

The Stories leaked from inside were that Intel Engineers were high fiving themselves for coming up with something so fast to counter Zen 4.
How Smart & Awesome Intel Engineers was, thinking they did something radical/amazing.
Now that they're costing Intel ALOT of $$$ in RMA, I'm sure the higher ups are looking for heads to roll for doing something so dumb.

But Hindsight is 20/20, it's TOO late now. The liabilities that they've caused.
Intel REFUSES to do a Product Recall, knowing what other legal liabilities that would incur, so they just decided to extend the Warranty just enough, to avoid trouble.
We'll see how that works out for them, I think it's going to BITE THEM in the ARSE. CPU's are supposed to have ~15+ years of longevity when lightly to no OC.
You might as well consider 13th/14th gen DEAD for 2nd hand market, NOBODY wants to touch it.

There are (At Least) 2 Class Action Law suits in the making.

Also, IFS had Rust/Oxidation issues in their fabs, and they HID that from the customers.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
I had to look up leaks to even find the time frame of exactly when it happened, and at what fab.
The fact that they hid that from the public is also causing MAJOR headaches.

Intel originally blames the MoBo vendors for "Default OCing" the Intel CPU's, but that's been normal behavior for decades.
When it turns out badly for Intel, they threw their MoBo vendors partners under the bus and blamed them.
 
Last edited:
Oh, the stories to tell.

The 13th & 14th gen were not supposed to exist. They were not on the original roadmaps.

Raptor Lake & Raptor Lake Refresh literally popped out of nowhere over-night.
Some Bean Counter Up top pressed some engineers to do a hatchet "Copy / Paste" job to pump up the Frequency & Cache + more E-Cores.
It got approved & sent to manufacturing in ~ 1 year, what normally is a 4 year CPU validation process.

Now excessive voltages are frying their own ring-buses gradually in the short term. That's the leading theory that is.
We're talking > 1.5 V to the Ring Bus so that the P+E cores can be OCed right out of the factory to beat Zen 4
Low & Behold, MASSIVE Crashes & Blue Screens to the customer in < 1-2 years depending on how lucky you were.

The Stories leaked from inside were that Intel Engineers were high fiving themselves for coming up with something so fast to counter Zen 4.
How Smart & Awesome Intel Engineers was, thinking they did something radical/amazing.
Now that they're costing Intel ALOT of $$$ in RMA, I'm sure the higher ups are looking for heads to roll for doing something so dumb.

But Hindsight is 20/20, it's TOO late now. The liabilities that they've caused.
Intel REFUSES to do a Product Recall, knowing what other legal liabilities that would incur, so they just decided to extend the Warranty just enough, to avoid trouble.
We'll see how that works out for them, I think it's going to BITE THEM in the ARSE. CPU's are supposed to have ~15+ years of longevity when lightly to no OC.

There are (At Least) 2 Class Action Law suits in the making.

Also, IFS had Rust/Oxidation issues in their fabs, and they HID that from the customers.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
I had to look up leaks to even find the time frame of exactly when it happened, and at what fab.
The fact that they hid that from the public is also causing MAJOR headaches.

Intel originally blames the MoBo vendors for "Default OCing" the Intel CPU's, but that's been normal behavior for decades.
When it turns out badly for Intel, they threw their MoBo vendors partners under the bus and blamed them.


I think that's why Asus was coping a lot of heat off people for mobos frying their processors... I wonder if they might also sue Intel
 
HIGHLY doubtful, they have StockHolm's Syndrome.

They're not going to bite the hand that feeds them.

OK because Gamers Nexus also laid into them over their mobos doing stuff to cpus.

I love the comments section there .... "they're doing this Boeing style"
 
Last edited:
OK because Gamers Nexus also laid into them over their mobos doing stuff to cpus
It's not just ASUS, ALL the MoBo vendors were doing "Default Stock OC of your Intel CPU" right-out of the box.

But Intel never defined what "Stock Settings" were.

It's still incredibly vague as to what "Stock Settings" are to this day.

There's TOO much wiggle room in their definition, that's by design.

This way Intel can throw their partners under the bus when they stop being useful to them.

Intel plays with the name and the data: The “Intel Baseline Profile” becomes “Intel Default Settings”

Talk about messing with your MoBo partners.
 
It's not just ASUS, ALL the MoBo vendors were doing "Default Stock OC of your Intel CPU" right-out of the box.

But Intel never defined what "Stock Settings" were.

It's still incredibly vague as to what "Stock Settings" are to this day.

There's TOO much wiggle room in their definition, that's by design.

This way Intel can throw their partners under the bus when they stop being useful to them.

Ah I see, but it looks like a pretty shitty thing
 
Another video

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


OK a bit of a fun one. I love this channel

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top