Eh, no idea, plug in stuff and use the taskmanager to see if anything is active, that's all I can think of.
I did that but can't find the actual filename for the driver. It worked so I didn't dig too much. I don't think they are actual .exe files but .sys files.
The driver .sys files should be in C:Windows/System32/drivers
I use a wireless mouse and my Microsoft wired driver mouclass.sys is still in the drivers folder.
But then, I'm still use Windows 7.
I unplugged the mouse receiver, waited a few seconds and plugged it back in. It didn't show that it was reloading the driver, so I think it is running in the background, at least on my PC that is the case.Oh I know where the drivers are just I couldn't find the exact file. But it's a non issue it was just curiosity on my part. I just wondered if the wired drivers are still running in the background when you use a wireless keyboard and mouse, or if the same drivers can accommodate both wired and wireless peripherals.
I unplugged the mouse receiver, waited a few seconds and plugged it back in. It didn't show that it was reloading the driver, so I think it is running in the background, at least on my PC that is the case.
Oh, always. I know me, I can screw up something in a heartbeat, so I take every update with caution. Plus, I'm still getting the hang of Manjaro. Last distros I really played around with were Ubuntu and Mint, and Arch is a bit of a different beast.I used Manjaro for 5 years before moving to another distro more than a year ago.
Nothing wrong with Manjaro, I liked it but other distros are a better choice in my case now.
Beside, Arch based distros are the best if Plasma is your DE of choice.
I would still suggest to read the release notes before an update or even wait for feedbacks from users. It's not specific to Manjaro but to any rolling release distro.
Yep, I've tasted many Linux flavors. So far, Manjaro's the one that makes me want to stick around and try the whole thing. It's rather fascinating. First thing I did was make an image, which was a wise decision because I've managed to nearly destroy my installation 3 times just trying to configure things. So caution has now become the watchword, but wow, what great performance, stability, and I love the security and privacy. I know that Linux isn't watching everything I type, listening to everything I say, or monitoring every site I visit, and it's very liberating.I'm still on Linux Mint with, depending on the machine, Cinnamon or XFCE.
In the past I've used Ubuntu/Xubuntu and Suse Linux when it was still just Suse Linux so that's really long ago.. it was version 10.1 didn't really use a suitable machine for it, it was a Compaq Deskpro with a Pentium II 400, 256Mb RAM and I think a 4Gb drive, it HATED my iiYama monitor and at first refuse to run it at anything above 60Hz and yeah.. CRT and 60hz..
I've also used Slackware, Debian, Red Hat when it was just Red Hat and not Fedora, antiX, Vector Linux, Zenwalk, KateOS, LXLE Linux and Puppy Linux..and I might have forgotten a few..
Oh, absolutely, the package manager is absurdly simple. It's literally "I need a good budget software. Oh, there's one. Install. Done."I stuck with Mint because for all my desktop needs it works without any limitations, I don't miss anything, I don't need Windows, and also the ease of things, fire up the installer, just tell it what you want and it hassle free installs the whole thing.![]()
Manjaro, like Mint, is so simple in that regard, too. It still feels weird that I can see a program like, say, Lutris, and be like "I should install that." Open up the terminal, "sudo pamac install lutris," and it's done. It feels like magic words.
I will say if I have one minor gripe about KDE Plasma is that it uses Dolphin. Dolphin's good, but sometimes it's a bit slow and gets in its own way. Nemo, IMO, is the superior file manager. The one thing Dolphin does have that I like is tabbed windows. That comes in handy.
Ok, I will remember that, thank you! I'm still learning and for some reason pamac was the first command I came across.I never used pamac except for the GUI version but reading the wiki https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Pamac you are not supposed to use sudo with it. It will probably ask for your password when it needs it.
The Arch way is to use pacman and/or an AUR helper. Pamac is probably a helper but after reading the wiki, I find it complicated.
Manjaro used to have yay in its official repo, don't know if it's still the case. The Arch community seems to favor paru today (at least available in AUR, don't know for Manjaro repo).
Fedora's one I'd love to really give a try, but before I do that I want to know Linux inside and out. I spent three decades with Windows. Hopefully, grasping the complexities of Linux won't take nearly as long.I tried KDE again recently after years on Gnome but it's a waste of time for me : I spend too much time configuring it. In the end I always try to make it work and look like Gnome and it's never satisfying. Gnome takes time to get use to its workflow but there is no going back after and it stays out of the way when I try to actually do things with my PC.
I could never get used to Cinnamon so it kept me away from Mint.
I did a lot of distro hopping since a year and I always end reinstalling Fedora. It's a very pleasant distro.
I have a 2nd low specs laptop and I installed Pop os on it. It's a little heavy for this PC but it's not so bad, I might keep it.
Ok, I will remember that, thank you! I'm still learning and for some reason pamac was the first command I came across.
Thank you!It's probably the command promoted by Manjaro.
I gave you only suggestions, if in the end you are comfortable with pamac it's fine.
Linux is about choices : commands, distro, desktop envioronments. In the end, there is no wrong option, just the options right for you![]()
Philistine!I am a music player neanderthal.. on Mint I just use Celluloid or VLC player, not sure you can get Foobar 2000 for Linux but I've used that on Windows..
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.