• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Future of Paramount includes Star Trek tentpole

Paramount renews with Skydance, seeks to assure Huahua

While CBS is doing quite well money-wise, Viacom (parent company of Paramount Pictures who hold the rights to make Star Trek movies) is still struggling in that area. But today brought some good news as Varietyreports Skydance Media and Paramount Pictures announced they have renewed their partnership. David Ellison’s Skydance has partnered with Paramount on a number of recent tentpole films, including both Star Trek Into Darkness and Star Trek Beyond. Ellison was also credited as an executive producer on both films.

After a number of box office disappointments, Skydance was apparently looking to end the relationship but the recent hiring of a new Paramount CEO has kept them in the fold.

“We have the utmost confidence in Paramount’s bright future under the strategic direction of Jim Gianopulos, and we look forward to continuing to partner with him and the world-class leadership team that he has put in place,” David Ellison said in a statement. “From beloved franchises to wholly original IP and bold new animated films, together we have ambitious plans to bring more great stories to the big screen for audiences around the globe.”

The announcement included a number of previously announced upcoming Paramount films including installments from the Mission: Impossible, Top Gun, World War Z and Terminator franchises, but did not mention Star Trek.

Variety is also reporting that executives from Viacom are headed to China to secure additional future financing with Huahua, another partner on Star Trek Beyond. The Chinese company is said to be unhappy with the performance of recent Paramount films in China (notably Baywatch and Transformers: The Last Night) and want reassurances about the future slate.

From Variety:

Huahua believes it still has the ability to get out of the deal if Paramount films do not improve their financial performance in the next 12 to 24 months. The hope is that next week’s meeting, during which Viacom will present new proposals and preview upcoming releases, will better clarify Paramount’s long-term strategy.

“Viacom needs to explain a better plan for how it spends [our] investment money,” the Huahua source said.

As we have reported, Paramount and its parent Viacom see Star Trek as one of their key tentpole franchises, and all ‘tentpole’ films from Paramount require outside financing from partners like Skydance and Huahua. These deals could be critical components of decisions on what to do next with the Trek film franchise.
Paramount renews with Skydance, seeks to assure Huahua

"The announcement included a number of previously announced upcoming Paramount films including installments from the Mission: Impossible, Top Gun, World War Z and Terminator franchises, but did not mention Star Trek."

:/
http://trekmovie.com/2017/08/07/les...episodes-of-star-trek-discovery-are-terrific/
 
The Fast and Furious series didn't get HUGE until the 5th film. I know there's almost no chance that would happen with Star Trek, but it would be awesome if Star Trek 4 was made and grossed over $650 mil. Sigh. It annoys me that the general populace doesn't care about Star Trek.
 
The Fast and Furious series didn't get HUGE until the 5th film. I know there's almost no chance that would happen with Star Trek, but it would be awesome if Star Trek 4 was made and grossed over $650 mil. Sigh. It annoys me that the general populace doesn't care about Star Trek.
to get the general public hyped about Trek they need to bring in the Klingons (properly) and/or the borg, and also bring in Shatner and Stewart somehow
 
You're wrong. Discovery is a visual reboot of the TOS era, and so everything in that era will be updated but still harken back to what's come before. There is a reason every other federation ship in Discovery has boxy/rectangular parts/nacelles over the more cylindrical look we are accustomed to. New/casual fans might confuse two different ships that have similar body configuration and both with cylindrical body parts...

to get the general public hyped about Trek they need to bring in the Klingons (properly) and/or the borg, and also bring in Shatner and Stewart somehow

The Borg....mayyybbeee. The general public doesn't give a shit about Klingons and especially Shatner and Stewart.
 
Maybe Stewart, since his X-Men stint only recently ended in Logan. He's more likely for an Orville cameo, though.

Shatner's public image isn't too far from David Hasselhoff's, outside of nostalgic Trek fan circles.
 
"The announcement included a number of previously announced upcoming Paramount films including installments from the Mission: Impossible, Top Gun, World War Z and Terminator franchises, but did not mention Star Trek."

The announcement included a number of previously announced upcoming Paramount films including installments from the Mission: Impossible, Top Gun, World War Z and Terminator franchises, but did not mention Star Trek.

So they're sure about making "Terminator 6: Another Bad Judgment Day" but they aren't certain yet about "Star Trek 4". Now why is that? :whistle:
 
There is no way Beyond has turned an actual profit at this point. And, I say that as someone that likes the movie.
It absolutely has, and within a year or two it'll be in the $600 million revenue range, with a $200 million profit.
 
Trek is niche. I'm happy with that. Even so, ST09 and stid sold 40 million tickets. There are about 3 or 4 million Trekkies in the USA. It's a viable movie franchise, even a solid tent pole. It's just not star wars(thankfully).

The Fast and Furious series didn't get HUGE until the 5th film. I know there's almost no chance that would happen with Star Trek, but it would be awesome if Star Trek 4 was made and grossed over $650 mil. Sigh. It annoys me that the general populace doesn't care about Star Trek.
 
And yet, it's still true. Not only for the reasons I outlined.. Which are correct. But also because of the article on movie revenue which I posted last year which supports me.

You guys.. Nothing. You keep looking at box office from box office MOJO. :lol:
 
And yet, it's still true. Not only for the reasons I outlined.. Which are correct. But also because of the article on movie revenue which I posted last year which supports me.

If Beyond was targeted to make $200 million dollars of profit, Paramount would have been rushing to get Star Trek 4 out the door, they wouldn't be pissing around playing with other franchises. We are a year-plus post release and the actors still haven't heard anything about it.

The numbers, and common sense, simply don't add up. There's no way Beyond has done $225 million of post-theatrical revenue.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top