• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Favorite military aircraft?

f35_2.jpg

F-35A.. a great all singing all dancing fighter..

Probably going to be few who agree with this but I much preferred the X-32, Boeing's entrant for the JSF contract. I like the nose intake look and it sort of reminded me of the A-7, another aircraft that I liked.
 
Yup they are indeed awesome :D I hate that it's only been like one attempt at a Swedish jet fighter movie. And naturally since Sweden is the "every movie has to be about relations and feelings, unless it is Beck crime movies, then it needs to be predictable and have bad lines"-country when it comes to film, the fighter pilot in the movie breaks his neck 25 minutes in, and the rest of the movie has almost no beautiful Viggen's in it! :scream:
 
I just came across some photos of my Grandfather with his bomber unit from WW2. So my favorite aircraft is a specific one, "O'Riley's Daughter II". I'm not sure which model it is yet. I think it may be the Martin XA-22, since I was told he was a reconaissance photographer. And the Martin looks like the plane. Will have to do some more comparison later ~

I also like the recently decomissioned F-14, the A-10, and the Stealth fighter and bomber. And the SR-71 was a cool ride in its day.
 
Lockheed P-2 Neptune (The P-2 was originally intended as a maritime-patrol and ASW craft, but we see quite a bit of them around here during fire season)

I know it's not strictly military (arguably paramilitary, I suppose) but if you want to talk waterbombers, my personal favourite is the Bombardier CL-415:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v35/mennnc1701/1093575.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v35/mennnc1701/Canadair_01.jpg

Not the prettiest birds around, I suppose, but still a hell of a sturdy plane, and very well-designed for it's role. They can carry over 6,000 l of water to drop on a fire, land in just six feet of water, and need less than a kilometre of lake to take off in with a full load. They're the ultimate machine for fighting wilderness fires.

EDIT: One more thing... here's a great video of a couple 415s in action, dropping on a fire in Northern Ontario. It's pretty damned impressive to watch, IMO. There's a lot that goes into a successful drop.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMDc5YxqlHY
Nifty! :D I like them already. How are they for drops in rugged terrain?
 
Lockheed P-2 Neptune (The P-2 was originally intended as a maritime-patrol and ASW craft, but we see quite a bit of them around here during fire season)

I know it's not strictly military (arguably paramilitary, I suppose) but if you want to talk waterbombers, my personal favourite is the Bombardier CL-415:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v35/mennnc1701/1093575.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v35/mennnc1701/Canadair_01.jpg

Not the prettiest birds around, I suppose, but still a hell of a sturdy plane, and very well-designed for it's role. They can carry over 6,000 l of water to drop on a fire, land in just six feet of water, and need less than a kilometre of lake to take off in with a full load. They're the ultimate machine for fighting wilderness fires.

EDIT: One more thing... here's a great video of a couple 415s in action, dropping on a fire in Northern Ontario. It's pretty damned impressive to watch, IMO. There's a lot that goes into a successful drop.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMDc5YxqlHY
Nifty! :D I like them already. How are they for drops in rugged terrain?

You mean like mountainous regions? I'm honestly not sure. Neither of the two Canadian operators (Ontario and Quebec) have any "real" mountains, though the northern parts of both provinces are quite remote and rugged, and I don't know enough about their international operations to comment there. Still, as you can see in the video, they're designed to attack fires low and slow, so I imagine that as long as they have enough room to accelerate up and away from the burn area they'd be fine.

The whole idea of the plane is that it is self-sufficient in the field... unlike most water bombers, it can quickly scoop up water, drop it on the fire, pick up more, and then drop it again. They only need to return to base to refuel.
 
Upon further searching I find my Grandfather's craft was the photo-recon modified Douglas A-20. A righteous aerial shot he took to follow...
 
I know it's not strictly military (arguably paramilitary, I suppose) but if you want to talk waterbombers, my personal favourite is the Bombardier CL-415:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v35/mennnc1701/1093575.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v35/mennnc1701/Canadair_01.jpg

Not the prettiest birds around, I suppose, but still a hell of a sturdy plane, and very well-designed for it's role. They can carry over 6,000 l of water to drop on a fire, land in just six feet of water, and need less than a kilometre of lake to take off in with a full load. They're the ultimate machine for fighting wilderness fires.

EDIT: One more thing... here's a great video of a couple 415s in action, dropping on a fire in Northern Ontario. It's pretty damned impressive to watch, IMO. There's a lot that goes into a successful drop.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMDc5YxqlHY
Nifty! :D I like them already. How are they for drops in rugged terrain?

You mean like mountainous regions? I'm honestly not sure. Neither of the two Canadian operators (Ontario and Quebec) have any "real" mountains, though the northern parts of both provinces are quite remote and rugged, and I don't know enough about their international operations to comment there. Still, as you can see in the video, they're designed to attack fires low and slow, so I imagine that as long as they have enough room to accelerate up and away from the burn area they'd be fine.

The whole idea of the plane is that it is self-sufficient in the field... unlike most water bombers, it can quickly scoop up water, drop it on the fire, pick up more, and then drop it again. They only need to return to base to refuel.
Mountainous regions were what I had in mind, yes; we've got a lot of that around here (Southern California) and a lot of the fires tend to occur in such areas, difficult to access except by air. I do note that the Wiki article which I linked earlier had this to say about what one of the outfits providing firefighting planes intended to use as replacements for the P-2s when they end their service life:

Civilian firefighting

P-2/P2Vs are currently employed in aerial firefighting roles by operators such as Aero Union and Neptune Aviation Services and can carry 2,400 gal (9,084 l) of retardant with a service life of 15,000 hours. Neptune proposes to replace them with Bombardier Q200 and Q300 aircraft which are estimated to have a service life of 80,000 hours.
Same manufacturer, but distinctly different models, I noted -- presumably because those are generally suited for a variety of terrains.
 
f35_2.jpg

F-35A.. a great all singing all dancing fighter..

Probably going to be few who agree with this but I much preferred the X-32, Boeing's entrant for the JSF contract. I like the nose intake look and it sort of reminded me of the A-7, another aircraft that I liked.

800px-Boeing_X-32B_Patuxent.jpg


Perhaps..but the X-32 was based on an outdated VTOL concept..and had serious issues with exhaust re-ingestion causing a critical loss of power near the ground..however the latest version of the Chinese J-10 has a similar intake structure to give the J-10 a degree of stealthiness..

J-10B2.jpg
 
I love the look of the Russian Sukhoi aircraft, and especially:

The Su-34 Fighter Bomber:


The Su-47 Berkut:


I've always been a fan of the F-111 as well:


And the A-5 Vigilante:
 
It is very hard for me to come up with a single favorite. But if I force myself, I have to come down to a plane that never made it to combat: the Boeing B-47 Stratojet.

When I was a kid in the 1970s, the libraries had a lot of '50s vintage books on airplanes with a heavy Cold War emphasis. Of course the B-52 was the star, the big bruiser with the eight engines, vast wings and massive undercarriage. But there was another plane that caught my attention, a slim, sleek bomber with graceful swept wings and a bubble canopy like a fighter. Then I caught the movie Strategic Air Command on TV one afternoon (they used to show old movies instead of infomercials and judge shows!), and was intrigued by the scene where the general gives B-36 pilot Jimmy Stewart a sneak peek at SAC's new jet, the B-47, which is revealed with much drama in a hangar that is lit just enough to highlight its graceful curves and angles. Then Stewart's squadron starts training in the new bomber, and they take off one after the other in long clouds of rocket-assist smoke. I was captivated by this beautiful jet, which seemed to embody an time when the "jet age" was brand new and exciting, like science fiction come to life.

Later I found out what an important aircraft the B-47 had been, pushing the envelope of aeronautical design and engineering in the late '40s, and laying the groundwork for what would become the Boeing 707, the prototype of the modern jetliner.

Runners-up for favorites are:

Boeing B-29: Big, ambitious and sophisticated, the pinnacle of US airpower in WW2.

Vought F4U Corsair: Long cowling and massive prop betray the power of this unmistakable bent-winged workhorse, beloved by aviators and ground-pounders alike.

Bell UH-1 "Huey": Not the original air mobility helo, but quickly became the best. Handled every mission they could think up in Vietnam.

De Havilland Mosquito: The sleek and fast wooden wonder that took on some of the most dangerous missions of the war.

It's true, the Navy tested the C-130 as a potential Carrier Onboard Delivery aircraft, however, the aircraft was rather cumbersome on deck and ate a ton of deck space. Grumman's C-2 Greyhound subsequently was ordered as the Navy's COD aircraft, and later as the E-2 Hawkeye would become a carrier-based AWACS aircraft.

The original project was for a replacement for the E-1, which became the E-2. The Greyhound was an offshoot, just as the Trader was an offshoot of the Stoof. E-2's were in the fleet for a year or two before the C-2's.

--Justin
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top