Drastic? Not as drastic.
Noticable and distracting? Yes.
Okay. I don't see it, but I'm not applying to the Cardassian Bureau of Identification so whatever.
Drastic? Not as drastic.
Noticable and distracting? Yes.
As I said, it's a mileage may vary situation.Okay. I don't see it, but I'm not applying to the Cardassian Bureau of Identification so whatever.
I don't think it's controversial to say {...}
The new AndorIan makeup and even the Romulan makeup of the TNG era wasn't as much of a COMPLETE DEPARTURE from the way Klingons looked in TOS.I don't, and don't call me Shirley.
Ah, so all the changes in Andorian makeup from TOS to the movies to the Berman era and beyond will be explained someday, and it won't just be that someone made a change to the makeup, it will literally be explained later. Good to know.
(And hell, the look of the Klingons changed from film to film from TMP - TUC).
How so?
![]()
In the above pic (borrowed from an earlier post here in this very thread):
Wolfman = ST:TMP
Okey Dokey = STIII:TSFS
Grandpa = STIV:TVH
Dude Bro = STV: TFF
Pirate = STVI: TUC
TMP to TSFS isn't much variation. The weird overhanging cheek pieces (that only Mark Lenard seemed to sport) denote that Klingon Captain as a particularly ugly bastard, but well within spec.
The TMP guys didn't sport a whole lot in the way of proud temporal ridges (which can produce the square headed or ridge-plate look on some Klingons), but not all did from ST3 to ENT. Hairlines also varied. So, it is within spec. Given that we know houses run ships as per TNG, the fact that these guys on the bridge have built up brows and proud central ridges but without much in the way of protruding temporal ridges on the side isn't a big deal.
So, the make-up is basically locked in from then until JJ-Trek, though even the JJ look is potentially tolerable if we assume those goofy piercings caused hair loss. ;-)
Seriously, given what we know from Enterprise, this post shows one species until the lower right:
Because they did., I really don't see how you can say "the look of the Klingons changed from film to film".
Wait, really??? The Orion heads were that elaborate?I don't think it's controversial to say that the makeup department under Neville Page/Glen Hetrick was allowed to run wild on Discovery. They seemed to push towards really ornate, over-engineered designs, with the visual depiction of different races changing for the sake of change. That didn't really bother me, however the reliance on full-face silicone masks did, as it really limited the emotive range of the actors. By far the most ridiculous case of this was in DIS's third season, when Orions were depicted with a full mask, when they could easily have been dealt with via face paint as they had on ENT.
Wait, really??? The Orion heads were that elaborate?
Then why in the world did we get that awful scene in the finale where Michael Burnham killed Osyraa with a headshot, but the camera never showed a close-up of Osyraa's dead face? That is exactly the time for a TV cliché to hammer in the villain's defeat!
Even in DSC Season 1 the Orions were using more than just green paint.Yeah, there was a time-lapse video with the actress who played Osyraa getting the makeup put on. She had a full silicone mask which went all the way down her neck. You can clearly see this in some of the close shots with the makeup looking weird around her lips (where presumably her natural skin was showing). She also never really expressed much facially, because it would cause the makeup to pull away.
I will say the Season 4 Orion cadet (Harrel) looked a bit more natural. The actor may have just been using green face paint.
Even in DSC Season 1 the Orions were using more than just green paint.
Probably.Again though, I don't understand why bodypaint is that bad. Is there some concern it would look fake in HD?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.