Apparently there's some discussion about the yellow/red-card against the Russian (Kolodin?) at the end of regular time. It seems that the referee's decision to withdraw the card was quite fishy...
I do agree that the red card decision was fishy. IMO the ball was not over the line.Apparently there's some discussion about the yellow/red-card against the Russian (Kolodin?) at the end of regular time. It seems that the referee's decision to withdraw the card was quite fishy...
But the Russians really deserved that victory anyway and I can't imagine the UEFA doing anything about it, except maybe not letting Michel referee the final.
Yeah, but the reason he changed his mind wasn't because of that, but because the ball was supposedly over the line.Apparently there's some discussion about the yellow/red-card against the Russian (Kolodin?) at the end of regular time. It seems that the referee's decision to withdraw the card was quite fishy...
It wasn't fishy at all. Lubos made the right call after initially making the wrong call. It was never a yellow card offense. In fact it wasn't a foul at all. The replay shows that clearly.
Yeah, but the reason he changed his mind wasn't because of that, but because the ball was supposedly over the line.Apparently there's some discussion about the yellow/red-card against the Russian (Kolodin?) at the end of regular time. It seems that the referee's decision to withdraw the card was quite fishy...
It wasn't fishy at all. Lubos made the right call after initially making the wrong call. It was never a yellow card offense. In fact it wasn't a foul at all. The replay shows that clearly.
Was that the official reason from Lubos in the referee's report? The broadcast here never mentioned the ball being over the touch line. Either he consulted with the linesman who probably told him that Rolodin didn't commit any foul in that lunge.
But withdrawing a card that was given to a specific player is problematic in any case (I've seen countless football games, probably close to a thousand or so by now, and I don't remember that ever happening before).
A very well known swiss referee said on german television, that the distinction would be, that if the yellow card was shown because it was a severe foul it should have sticked, if it was because of a tactical foul it could be withdrawn.
The problem is, that the official rules don't seem to be quite clear in this area, obviously it can't be that player can be fouled without consequence just because the ball isn't in play anymore. Any I don't think the linesman told the referee that it wasn't a foul to begin with, because he wasn't as close, and he doesn't really have that kind of authority anyway.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.