That wonderful rendering of the new old Enterprise was done by Daniel Broadway aka PixelMagic. Looky here.
I'm petty sure it's a still of the trailer... I think... It was part of the first batch of pics to be released.![]()
I would guess that the above picture is a fan extrapolation based on the trailer since it looks a little more CGI than the trailer and the ship looks like it's more complete than it was in the trailer too (no more panels need to be welded on). It looks pretty great though.
Good... its a lovely image, but I wasn't digging those nacelles - not for the official film version anyway. Kudos, though, to PixelMagic on a job very well done indeed!That wonderful rendering of the new old Enterprise was done by Daniel Broadway aka PixelMagic. Looky here.
What star streaks? The stars seem to be standing still. The only other thing on the screen/window(?) I see is the glare from the bridge lights.As for the window, why are the star streaks going to right to left.
As for the window, why are the star streaks going to right to left. If the windows is in the front of the ship, then we would see them coming towards the screen. I think the window is for a tos style readyroom. Someone posted a photo of the bridge and if you look at the left of the bridge model, you see something sticking out...It maybe the new readyroom.
![]()
So long as he doesn't unintentionally make a spoof, yes.I'd have to disagree. I think this is exactly the kind of attitude needed to make Star Trek viable again.
Yes, his intent seems good. I'm optimistic about this - the stills look good, the reactions so far have been great, its written by Trek fans, etc...Actually, if you read all of his remarks in context it's clear that his concern with stuff like "Galaxy Quest" is to avoid making a spoof or parody or something self-consciously ironic.
If so, then there's more than one.
Ah, you can see the window on the bridge dome in that photo -- it is in the shadow but is there.
Neither has any of the other directors who has directed Star Trek.There really hasn't been an instance where I've read something that J.J. Abrams said and thought "Wow. That was really insightful."
Of course not. Abrams has had three successful shows on TV and Ron Moore has had none. Abrams is now going to headline two major motion pictures, Ron Moore has never done so. Abrams is a household name, Ron Moore isn't.But, point is: Ron Moore, he's not.
What? Where'd you get that pic from?If I may point out...
If you look here the front of the bridge on the outside appears to be solid hull.
http://i34.tinypic.com/1hdky.jpg
Perhaps the exterior hull slides away to show the window and the HUD comes up. When the window is covered by the exterior hull there is just a view screen there. Maybe?!![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.