Maybe, it wouldn't be too expensive - but its demand is the least in the franchise. I doubt its on anyone's radar.Would it be worth even attempting to blu ray the toon!?
TAS, DS9, and VOY blu rays are probably not happening.
Cheap and easy I'd suspect. Just a scanning and cleaning job. The results nay not be really worth it though - there's so little detail in most animation that upscaled DVD's look pretty good.So the 'forthcoming' regarding the TAS blu-ray set in the Memory Alpha article is based on nothing then?
So the 'forthcoming' regarding the TAS blu-ray set in the Memory Alpha article is based on nothing then?
Cheap and easy I'd suspect. Just a scanning and cleaning job. The results nay not be really worth it though - there's so little detail in most animation that upscaled DVD's look pretty good.
While I'd love to see TAS on Blu-ray, that article is from three years ago and Burnett went on to clarify it was on his wish list.
"A few days later this was clarified by Burnett as just a "wish list" of projects he'd like to see, but it was not something that was actually being developed presently."
Yes, that bit confused me as well. No, let me rephrase that, it confused me why the article still lists the set as 'forthcoming' despite the line about it not being in development.
Technically, no.Physical media still has it's place, vinyl records can still be bought and weren't CD's supposed to replace them, speaking of which MP3's have yet replaced CD's.
I'm sad that DS9 will likely not get an HD upgrade - well not for some years yet. I just started re-watching the show on Crave TV (a Canadian online streaming site) and the video quality is terrible. I swear they must have just transferred it from VHS it's so interlaced!
I'm hoping that if the Trek show is successful, CBS will invest in upgrading all the remaining Trek catalog.
I honestly can't tell the difference. But I grew up with AM radio, a crappy one-speaker record player, and an 8-track deck in my first car. My brain is probably still filling in the spaces.Former Audio Engineer for NASA TV here, I'm with you on the inferiority of MP3, however, MP3 is by far the dominant audio planet due to it's file size and ability to be quickly downloaded over Napster in the early days of broadband file sharing. A vast majority of people can't tell the difference between MP3 and WAV or FLAC files. "Good enough" works for them.
True FLAC is 3-4 times the file size. If you give someone the option of downloading a song in 3 minutes or 12, they're going to pick the 3 minute one and then listen to it via their shitty earbuds because cheap and convenient wins.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.