It seems that film proponents claim that film has a slightly higher resolution than the highest current digital format available, no matter what that is.I've seen some claim up to 6k scans are practical for 35mm film, but I'd personally expect to see no noticable difference above 1080p.![]()
I guess the argument is whether or not higher resolution, frame rate etc is needed or not. Certainly there is nothing bad looking about good old fashioned 35mm film.
I'd like to see all the options as tools a filmmaker has in making a piece of art, while digital looks great for films with a lot of SFX, glossy high budget pics like the Avengers, 35mm is great for anything moodier and more atmospheric.