• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Does the 32nd Century Need the Federation Anymore?

nic3636

Captain
Captain
One thing that would be interesting to explore is if the Federation is still a good fit with the landscape of the 32nd century given how much things have changed. Does the Federation represent a universal set of ideals that are always relevant or is it more a relic of the past that has become obsolete? Or maybe somewhere in the middle, where the Federation is still relevant as a concept but the structure needs to be modified to fit in with the current times?

I think it would be interesting if part of the reason the Federation diminished so much in S3 was because it was desperately clinging to the past and is struggling adapting to the needs of the present. I realize this is not the direction they are going in based on what happened in S3 but I think it would be interesting to explore as the Federation tries to recruit worlds in S4.
 
I think the idea of the Federation might be relevant, but it's feasibility as an actual entity isn't. The Federation, by its nature, depends on FTL travel and communication. With warp at a greater premium and communication with limited range, the Federation can't function like it used to.

The fact that Starfleet and the Federation consolidated so much and has to keep the location of Starfleet Command a secret means they've cocooned. If they've cocooned, they can't be that much of a force in the galaxy.

I think the big power struggle of the 32nd Century isn't whether or not the Federation is relevant but more, "Who will replace the Federation?" The Emerald Chain is one of the powers that wants to replace it.
 
Last edited:
What are the choices from what’s been seen?
  • Be isolationist (United Earth)
  • Be independent (Ni’Var, Trill)
  • Be exploited by a capitalist power (Hima & Hunhau by the Emerald Chain)
Plus, its alluded to that capitalism is practiced within the Federation.

At the very least, there needs to be a power that is not capitalist. An ideal that seemed to be practiced by the Federation.
 
Every empire rises and falls, sometimes by outside forces, sometimes by internal corruption, etc. with the federation being that big, a centralized governement would HAVE to be a weak one to survive because ruling from a 1000ly away invites revolution, no representation, corruption, favoring core systems, etc.
So the Federation will rise, then fall, and another system will replace it, then planets will rise and fall. How many old empires have risen and fell? Iconian? Tkon? Preservers? There's a cycle.

after the burn, you will have planets that would want to rejoin, and some that will say .. we're good, don't need you, havent need you for over 100 years.
 
One thing that would be interesting to explore is if the Federation is still a good fit with the landscape of the 32nd century given how much things have changed. Does the Federation represent a universal set of ideals that are always relevant or is it more a relic of the past that has become obsolete? Or maybe somewhere in the middle, where the Federation is still relevant as a concept but the structure needs to be modified to fit in with the current times?

I think it would be interesting if part of the reason the Federation diminished so much in S3 was because it was desperately clinging to the past and is struggling adapting to the needs of the present. I realize this is not the direction they are going in based on what happened in S3 but I think it would be interesting to explore as the Federation tries to recruit worlds in S4.
I'm struggling to figure out, how does all of this stuff make or form the series I live which is TOS???
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top