I think that in a real life perspective that would be too early, but that it fit the movie and it wouldn't have been as good if they had left him to become captain in a later film.
3rd attempt: Cheats so blatantly that he'll be caught, so he can publicly rail against what he thinks is a ridiculous test.
3rd attempt: Cheats so blatantly that he'll be caught, so he can publicly rail against what he thinks is a ridiculous test.
If that was the case, why did he wait? If someone wanted to make a point, shouldn't he admit that he cheated instead of waiting to hear it from his superiors?
I love the movie. I can also discuss some of its shortcomings. The problem, for me, is those who bash anyone who liked the movie at all. Some are just showing up in threads to say, "It's stupid and so is anyone who likes it," rather than contribute to the discussion.Because it was plot point worthy of Bucky Buckson, Space Rocketeer ratherthan Star Trek. I guess one man's "whiny slug" is another man's "fan with a modicum of intellect and critical thinking skills."
Once again, any serious criticism of this film is greeted with sheer contempt. Against expectations, I liked the film but my opinion of its TrekBBS cheering section hasn't changed one bit.
Yes, it has flaws... yes, it is good to point them out and suggest improvements. No, it is NOT OK to simply resort to name-calling.
QFT.
I'll admit when I saw it at the time, seeing him get the Captaincy of the Enterprise so fast surprised me (with me thinking 'well that was a bit quick'), but I just got on with it, as I did with some of the other quibbles I had with the movie ('There's always a bigger fish' anyone?). You know, it's fiction, and there are sometimes going to be things that don't make sense. Didn't ruin it for me not to see it again a few times.
It's literally how vitriolic some of the posters on the board are being about the movie and in being determined to bash every single little thing. They suck out the enjoyment I had watching the film more than a red matter singularityBeginning to think I must be masochistic to keep arguing with them.
![]()
Although M'Sharak and I have butted heads a few times, it all comes back to his favorite phrase:I love the movie. I can also discuss some of its shortcomings. The problem, for me, is those who bash anyone who liked the movie at all. Some are just showing up in threads to say, "It's stupid and so is anyone who likes it," rather than contribute to the discussion.
Yes, it has flaws... yes, it is good to point them out and suggest improvements. No, it is NOT OK to simply resort to name-calling.
QFT.
I'll admit when I saw it at the time, seeing him get the Captaincy of the Enterprise so fast surprised me (with me thinking 'well that was a bit quick'), but I just got on with it, as I did with some of the other quibbles I had with the movie ('There's always a bigger fish' anyone?). You know, it's fiction, and there are sometimes going to be things that don't make sense. Didn't ruin it for me not to see it again a few times.
It's literally how vitriolic some of the posters on the board are being about the movie and in being determined to bash every single little thing. They suck out the enjoyment I had watching the film more than a red matter singularityBeginning to think I must be masochistic to keep arguing with them.
![]()
Whoa, whoa, whoa. A poster calls people who can't swallow this ludicrous plot development "whiny slugs" and somehow it's the "whiny slugs" who are resorting to name-calling and sucking all the fun out of the movie?
It's times like this I wish I did hate the movie.
No, I don't. I'll never for the life of me understand why some people have a problem with this.
Whiny slugs.
Because it was plot point worthy of Bucky Buckson, Space Rocketeer ratherthan Star Trek. I guess one man's "whiny slug" is another man's "fan with a modicum of intellect and critical thinking skills."
Once again, any serious criticism of this film is greeted with sheer contempt. Against expectations, I liked the film but my opinion of its TrekBBS cheering section hasn't changed one bit.
Read the URL:What the hell was that picture?![]()
Read the URL:What the hell was that picture?![]()
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c389/MikeN1138/zombiecheerleader.jpg
Back on topic?
Read the URL:What the hell was that picture?![]()
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c389/MikeN1138/zombiecheerleader.jpg
Back on topic?
Jeez, I guess I totally miscalled that one.Saavik is right about humor.
I had a great time at the movie. Loved it. 100% fun. But as stated before Kirk's promotion was the only thing that really bugged me. Funny, I can take altered timelines, new actors, wonky science and lensflare but not the promotion. And I even understand it from a storytelling perspective. Yet it still irks me.
Read the URL:What the hell was that picture?![]()
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c389/MikeN1138/zombiecheerleader.jpg
Back on topic?
Jeez, I guess I totally miscalled that one.Saavik is right about humor.
I had a great time at the movie. Loved it. 100% fun. But as stated before Kirk's promotion was the only thing that really bugged me. Funny, I can take altered timelines, new actors, wonky science and lensflare but not the promotion. And I even understand it from a storytelling perspective. Yet it still irks me.
It's times like this I wish I did hate the movie.
It was. Mr.LB just has a thing about not getting stuff, so I was pointing to the label.Jeez, I guess I totally miscalled that one.Saavik is right about humor.
I thought it was funny.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.