Treading on the hairy edge of Trolling here. Knock it off.
Thanks. People don't need to be rude
Treading on the hairy edge of Trolling here. Knock it off.
Remember when people said ENT violated canon by showing first contact with Klingons too early
He didn't explicitly say it was the Federation..which according to star trek Canon wasn't even 2 centuries old when TNG was based
So you need to be spoon-fed information and cannot make judgment calls for yourself despite having lots of evidence to make an educated guess. Gotcha.![]()
The other thing (that I mentioned earlier) is that the timeline changed. Thanks to FutureGuy and the Suliban, we have no idea if humans were supposed to meet Klingons as early as what was depicted in ENT. So Picard’s line would have referred to a different scenario entirely. Or going back even further, the timeline could have been changed when the Borg and Enterprise-E went back in time to the 21st century, which would explain why the Earth ships are nothing like what Spock described. And why SNW looks nothing like TOS.
The Star Trek prime universe timeline is most likely severely fucked up. And we can’t rely on the time cops to fix anything because they are completely incompetent at their job.
Or we could just accept that in a sixty-year-old franchise, the occasional contractions happen and it's not that big of a deal.
I was lukewarm on season 1, and season 2's "sophomore slump" killed my interest entirely. I may give it another go when episodes pop up on Pluto TV.Going to OP's original question....
I really enjoy Enterprise a lot. Love it even. The biggest problem is, when it was good it was great. But it was bad, boy was it bad. And it has a rather sizeable amount of bad during season 2. I struggle with that season really.
But overall, yup, I really love it.
Picard may have been talking about Vulcan first contact (which may be documented as Federation first contact as Vulcans are core members) - we know that was bad from "A Vulcan Hello".
I never saw Enterprise as establishing that earlier iterations were lacking in some way, rather that (to anthropomorphize the show itself) it was imitating its older and more well-loved siblings.
(Well, perhaps addressing the change in the appearance of Klingons could be seen as a tacit acknowledgment that television makeup wizardry wasn’t up to the task of fully realizing their alien features in the 1960s but I don’t think even that was supposed to be critical of TOS.)
In my personal perception, any changes Enterprise made to continuity tended to be so that they could play with the same cool toys as everyone else and maybe snag more viewers.
Who wouldn't want to do a fun goofy episode with Ferengi? With Jeff Combs, Ethan Phillips, and Clint Howard playing the Ferengi? Plus Trip running around in his blues (for those of us who, erhm, appreciate such things) as he comes to the rescue?
It was the first comedy episode for this show, the performances were great, there were fun scenes like the Ferengi trying to talk to Porthos, Archer and Trip staging a fight, T'Pol dangling the key in front of shackled Archer, T'Pol performing oomox, Ferengi just being Ferengi, always a highlight for me... I loved it all. Was I thinking about canon violations or screwed up timelines? Naw, I was too busy laughing. I don't blame the writers one bit for wanting to play with these cool toys (thanks, @Sumire).
And as someone pointed out upthread, after the alternate timestream was established by the Abramsverse, a person might just decide that all bets are off regarding what "belongs" in which show or timeline, or canon, and roll with it.
I thought "A Night in Sickbay" was funny too. There's room for all of us, because IDIC![]()
I mean, I felt Parallels really gave us this out.And as someone pointed out upthread, after the alternate timestream was established by the Abramsverse, a person might just decide that all bets are off regarding what "belongs" in which show or timeline, or canon, and roll with it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.