• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poll Do you consider Discovery to truly be in the Prime Timeline at this point?

Is it?

  • Yes, that's the official word and it still fits

    Votes: 194 44.7%
  • Yes, but it's borderline at this point

    Votes: 44 10.1%
  • No, there's just too many inconsistencies

    Votes: 147 33.9%
  • I don't care about continuity, just the show's quality

    Votes: 49 11.3%

  • Total voters
    434
You know what, there's a degree of subjectivity to what will annoy people and not. The Trill don't annoy me (I think the DS9 look is better and I have no problem assuming two racial variants in this case for some reason), while the DSC Klingons do (I think it's has to do more with the behind-the-scenes reasons and lack of having old Klingons also represented).

The two races makes zero sense and is a fan theory for a real world make up change.


The TMP Klingons had hair, too, as I recall. (It became kind of a signature look for them -- long hair and a beard, which may be why the DSC ones look so odd to some of us; try imagining a Star Trek show where the Borg use sleek white and silver Apple-like technology instead of the kludgy black cybernetics we all know.)

What we saw had hair, the first Idea and how they evolved did not.And being bald is am minor change. Not like what you are talking about.


Let's not dredge up that debate again (if them being "non-canon" simply means that they can be overwritten at a moment's notice, I don't find that status being very meaningful since that's how DSC is treating genuine canon materials as well, but to each their own). In any event, tie-ins are supposed to be canon compliant, so having a hairy Klingon in a DSC comic means that it's considered consistent with the TV show, which means that DSC fits with the rest of the franchise at least on that point.

There is no debate, its not canon.


Since ENT (and the post-TOS programs) showed that non-affected Klingons had hair, I don't think that would work. At best, a hairless subspecies would be the way to go if the DSC Klingons must be bald by biology.

Its a real life make up change. It changes a single line in canon. That is it, One line.
 
So, how could he get a Gorn skeleton prior to first contact?

That is the question, isn't it?

Fairly easy to imagine - the Gorn are spacefaring, and capable of landing personnel on alien worlds. We all know how unnamed crewmen fair on such expeditions. Doesn't take too much to imagine a skeleton or two are floating around as curiosities.
 
Lorca probably found it. Considering how much of the Galaxy the Terrans own, they probably found the Horta before us.

Hoshi knew about tribbles about 115 years before Kirk and his crew did so Mirror Lorca getting his hands on a live or deceased Horta hatchling isn't that big a deal. He's a sinister refugee from another universe who's into dark and ominous medical experiments. He clearly had methods of getting things.

In the case of the tribbles, they weren't an unknown species or impossible to get at. The problem with the Horta is that Lorca could not have obtained one period; in the "Devil in the Dar" (TOS) show, it's established that thousands of years before DSC the Horta underwent their last round of all but one dying and that the survivor taking care of the eggs. Seeing as there's only one Horta, that indicates that the eggs didn't start hatching until the TOS show. Then, years after DSC, the Janus IV mining colony digs into the Horta's levels for the very first time, setting off the story. The point is, Lorca cannot have a baby Horta since there are no unhatched baby Horta around for him to collect, anymore than one could get an iPhone in 1970. (Even if there were hatched baby Horta digging around, Lorca couldn't get at one, since there was no access to the tunnels yet.) Does that make any sense why Lorca's Horta is a continuity error?

I'm fine with that. Why not? Why are looks immutable?

Species don't just change and go back like that. Besides, keeping the same makeup for a fictional species helps build the suspension of disbelief.

Exactly. And Lorca might have enjoyed Horta eggs as a delicacy. So he picked one up.

The two races makes zero sense and is a fan theory for a real world make up change.

I agree, but, as Rule of Acquisition # 76 says: "Every once in a while, declare peace. It confuses the hell out of your enemies."

What we saw had hair, the first Idea and how they evolved did not.And being bald is am minor change. Not like what you are talking about.

The behind the scenes explanation doesn't, but, as I've admitted, "word of God" is not canon; I'm just worried about what the future will bring with the mindset that the change was made in.

There is no debate, its not canon.

Like I said, let's not start this again.

Its a real life make up change. It changes a single line in canon. That is it, One line.

No, it also changes years worth of footage.
 
I
The behind the scenes explanation doesn't, but, as I've admitted, "word of God" is not canon; I'm just worried about what the future will bring with the mindset that the change was made in.

Its a minor change that changes single line in canon. Its just being Bald, is not as if they now have 4 arms, 3 genders and speak in riddles.


Like I said, let's not start this again.

There is nothing to start, canon is on screen only.


No, it also changes years worth of footage.

And this is s relevant as Vulcans no longer been green
 
Species don't just change and go back like that. Besides, keeping the same makeup for a fictional species helps build the suspension of disbelief.
This is Star Trek. The Klingons went from smooth, to bumpy, without explanation...period. The entertainment value of Trek didn't suffer, nor did the fans some how miss out because the Klingons were not exactly the same as TOS.

There are plenty of explanations that could suffice-I've listed them all exhaustively.
 
Just show some Augment Klingons with smooth foreheads and TNG-style warriors. That's all they have to do. Acknowledge the others and thus establish that the Klingon Empire is a diverse civilization with lots of different ethnic groups and subgroups that look a certain way depending on where in the Empire you were born and live.

Keep your California Raisin Klingons with lockjaw. Just show others because we know as firmly set in the canon of no fewer than three different Trek series that at least some Klingons in this era looked more human. That's all they have to do. It won't ruin their narrative. It wouldn't shut everybody up and would just make other fans explode with rage, but it would be the best and easiest solution.

And they have yet to do it.

It doesn't mean they won't, but based on the track record of these producers I wouldn't hold my breath for long.
 
Why are folks hung up on the 'Bald' factor...

It's not like we haven't seen something similar before...

https://goo.gl/images/NDNemt
NDNemt


(why is it so GD complicated to insert pics nowadays?)
 
Last edited:
Bald Klingons happen. But these look and sound f'ing ugly and some hair might help make them look more palatable as a new makeup design.
 
I'm not sure why this is so important.

It could lead to a canon violation depending on how it's handled in the future (from a show that was said to follow canon).

Its a minor change that changes single line in canon. Its just being Bald, is not as if they now have 4 arms, 3 genders and speak in riddles.

See above.

There is nothing to start, canon is on screen only.

Then please, let it be.

And this is s relevant as Vulcans no longer been green

That sounds important.

This is Star Trek. The Klingons went from smooth, to bumpy, without explanation...period. The entertainment value of Trek didn't suffer, nor did the fans some how miss out because the Klingons were not exactly the same as TOS.

A.) An explanation was given. B.) Entertainment value and internal consistency are different things

There are plenty of explanations that could suffice-I've listed them all exhaustively.

To be honest, I'm inclined to accept the DSC Klingons as a variation at this point (even if I feel that the mindset behind the change is in error). If anything, Lorca's Horta (man, I love saying that), is a better example of DSC breaking its own rules on continuity.
 
The most logical explanation is that it's just really, really fashionable in 2250's Klingon society to shave(everything!) It's even caught on with Klingon bums in the Orion sector.
 
The most logical explanation is that it's just really, really fashionable in 2250's Klingon society to shave(everything!) It's even caught on with Klingon bums in the Orion sector.

It's the only way to be sure that there won't be any disgraceful hair pulling during hand-to-hand combat! Imagine the dishonor!
 
At this point I'm less interested in arguing about Klingon Foreheads than I am something else. Foreheads are Old Hat. But the male Klingon anatomy as revealed in "Will You Take My Hand?" Since it's revealed that male Klingons have two "organs", does this mean that AshVoq was forced to become half the man he used to be?

And Kor, Koloth, and Kang. Do they only have one in TOS and have more than one in DS9... or are they half-unics?

It also gives a whole new meaning to Sisko telling Worf and Dax to try to not break any bones.
 
They eventually learned that shaving their bodies left them with a weaker immune system. Many Klingons were catching the Levodian flu, sometimes during the month of Kahless! Since they absolutely despise having to get the flu shot, growing their hair became fashionable again.
 
At this point I'm less interested in arguing about Klingon Foreheads than I am something else. Foreheads are Old Hat. But the male Klingon anatomy as revealed in "Will You Take My Hand?" Since it's revealed that male Klingons have two "organs", does this mean that AshVoq was forced to become half the man he used to be?

And Kor, Koloth, and Kang. Do they only have one in TOS and have more than one in DS9... or are they half-unics?

It also gives a whole new meaning to Sisko telling Worf and Dax to try to not break any bones.

Does that mean that Klingon women have two vaginas?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top