I haven’t seen The Mandalorian but I’ve seen similar reports from SW nuts and casual viewers alike.
I guess the question we need to ask again is: why has nobody ever said this about any Star Trek production? I saw a twitter thread where a journo asked the void if anyone could name a TV series that remained good after season 4. Folks answered with the usual suspects - GoT, The Walking Dead, Sopranos, The Good Wife, Bosch and so on. I cringed so hard when I saw someone name DS9.
Now I love DS9 too, but dear god by any objective standard I would be very surprised if any TV critic would consider it good. I may be wrong on this point so don’t hit me, this is just my feeling and I’m not as learned as y’all on these matters. But in my opinion, most of Star Trek is in fact quite awful. When Star Trek is good, it’s only good ...for Star Trek. The Visitor is an amazing episode ...for Star Trek.
Disco is no exception. It’s Star Trek through and through. And as time goes on the novelty has worn off for me and I’m starting to see become less easily impressed. I thought the first half of this season was phenomenal (...for Star Tr- you get the idea), give or take a few unnecessary visits to boring rural backwaters, but everything since has been less good.
I still can’t believe that The Burn was caused by a bored Kelpian stuck in a bad Joe Menosky episode. I thought they screwed up the Red Angel - an interesting sci fi mystery presented as a meditation on faith vs. science but turned out just to be Burnham’s mum in an over-designed time travel suit. But eh.
I’m not trying to be a hater by the way. I look forward to Trek every week and time my pizza delivery to 7:05pm on Friday night, precisely 5 mins after Netflix makes it available in my local time. Woe betide the delivery human who delivers 5 minutes early, because I can’t start eating until Trek is available :/