• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Discovery is a very good show

Am I desensitised to drama? I don't even think she's that dramatic. She's pretty tough. If we are listing most dramatic trek characters, she's not at the top. The events of her life are/were dramatic but she doesn't create drama.

I'm not saying she necessarily caused drama. She just tends to react more emotionally than what I've seen in other Treks.
 
A little condescending, but sure, you do you

Anyways, I never get the sense any of those characters were always on the verge of an emotional breakdown like season 1-3 Burnham was
 
On the edge of an emotional breakdown?? She doesn't even cry. She's practically stoic the whole first season. In the end of season 2 she acts just like I would if someone told me my dead mom was alive. Archer irrationally loses his shit every other episode and he got to be captain, despite his emotional tirades screwing up diplomacy efforts multiple times...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sci
On the edge of an emotional breakdown?? She doesn't even cry. She's practically stoic the whole first season. In the end of season 2 she acts just like I would if someone told me my dead mom was alive. Archer irrationally loses his shit every other episode and he got to be captain, despite his emotional tirades screwing up diplomacy efforts multiple times...

I never said Archer was a good captain. I enjoyed ENT growing up but looking back it messed a lot up

Ok. We see captains go emotional all the time. One, I think she is in good company but I think she is a fascinating character. One I identify a lot with.

Mileage will vary.

Idk, Picard and Kirk never came off like Burnham did in season 2-3 to me unless it was an extreme situation.

Idk, I guess I never cared for her whole secret sister thing (reminds me too much of Sybok) so it was hard for me to get invested in the issues she faced.
 
Idk, Picard and Kirk never came off like Burnham did in season 2-3 to me unless it was an extreme situation.
So? There's more captains than those two who are very much designed as extremely heroic.
Idk, I guess I never cared for her whole secret sister thing (reminds me too much of Sybok) so it was hard for me to get invested in the issues she faced.
I don't care for the secret sister thing either. Doesn't make her a lesser character.
 
No, but you did say...
I never get the sense any of those characters were always on the verge of an emotional breakdown like season 1-3 Burnham was
and Archer seems on the verge of an emotional breakdown (or past one) in several episodes.
 
I liked Discovery, though I wish it would have made it's characters and stories stronger than what they were. I always felt they were holding back for some reason. I think exploring Burnham's interactions with other crew members and showing how those interactions influenced her decisions would have given wider appeal. Outside of racists and misogynists at least.
 
Anyways, I never get the sense any of those characters were always on the verge of an emotional breakdown like season 1-3 Burnham was
That’s just Sonequa Martin-Green’s style, and I guess it either works for you or it doesn’t. Personally it didn’t bother me at all any more than human Saru getting emotional during Burn Kid’s arc.
 
No. Discovery truly deserves the moniker of 'STD'. Because that's what is a disease, a blight; on the star trek franchise as a whole. I can not properly put into words my contempt for the series. And I've only seen the first two seasons and the the first few eps of s3. I cant tolerate anymore. It hurts. It makes me physically ill to watch.
 
No. Discovery truly deserves the moniker of 'STD'. Because that's what is a disease, a blight; on the star trek franchise as a whole. I can not properly put into words my contempt for the series. And I've only seen the first two seasons and the the first few eps of s3. I cant tolerate anymore. It hurts. It makes me physically ill to watch.
Klingon: Frankly, I never liked Earthers. They remind me of Regulan blood worms.

Chekov: That Cossack.

Scotty: Easy, lad. You ought to be more forgiving.

Korax: No. I just remembered. There is one Earthman who doesn't remind me of a Regulan blood worm. That's Kirk. A Regulan blood worm is soft and shapeless, but Kirk isn't soft. Kirk may be a swaggering, overbearing, tin-plated dictator with delusions of godhood, but he's not soft.

(Chekov leaps to his feet)

Scotty: Take it easy, lad. Everybody's entitled to an opinion.

Korax: That's right, and if I think that Kirk is a Denebian slime devil, well that's my opinion too.

Scotty: Don't do it, mister, and that's an order.

Chekov: You heard what he called the captain.

Scotty: Forget it. It's not worth fighting for. We're big enough to take a few insults. Now, drink your drink.

.
.
.

Anyway, you stuck around watching DSC a lot longer than I watched ENT. I dropped ENT after six episodes, back in '01. So you must've either not hated Discovery as much as you claim, or you really do enjoy hate-watching.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top