^^^^Oh and since Netflix doesn’t release global numbers (well almost never) outside of us hearing that the deal is done we will have practically no way to measure the shows success where it’s most important, and that is outside of the US. Financially speaking the US is almost an after thought.
Most of these so-called 'fans' should stick to Star Trek Continues (for how long it lasts) and The Orville, leaving the rest of us alone to watch and like Discovery.
No - ST: D is attempting to CONTNUE or REVITALIZE Star Trek as a 'pop culture craze' - and unless you've actually seen the Premiere it's a bit early to say exactly how it's trying to do that.I think if there's one thing last night's premier showed us, it's that these two shows have completely different agendas. The Orville is good old-fashioned TV fun. It's intentionally sophomoric and easy to digest. You tune in, you watch, have a few laughs and move on.
Discovery seems to be trying to set itself as being the next pop culture craze. It doesn't just want to emulate Thrones; it wants to be the next Thrones.
Let's hope for their sakes they don't believe that they can be "the next Game of Thrones."
I take it you weren't alive yet during the late 1960ies and through the 1970ies as it was a pop culture craze for a time.Star Trek has never been a pop culture craze. It became a staple niche over time, but it was never the thing that completely took over.
The quality of the products aside (i.e., let's say that are the same quality), DSC would be at the disadvantage because it is not on HBO.Let's hope for their sakes they don't believe that they can be "the next Game of Thrones."
Not sure I follow - what links the Klingons looking all blinged up to Game of Thrones?Looking at all the Klingon bling, I believe that is exactly what they are wanting it to be.
I think you're down playing just how big of a cultural phenomenon Thrones was. There has be nothing else like it. Ever.The quality of the products aside (i.e., let's say that are the same quality), DSC would be at the disadvantage because it is not on HBO.
I haven't seen DSC yet, but let's stipulate for the sake of argument that it is a good show with wide appeal. If it were on HBO and GoT was on CBSAA, then DSC would probably be a bigger hit in the U.S. than GoT, just because more people have HBO.
Having said that, I think the world access to DSC via Netflix will be very helpful to it.
My point isn't that if DSC was good and on HBO that it would be just as big as GoT on HBO.I think you're down playing just how big of a cultural phenomenon Thrones was. There has be nothing else like it. Ever.
My point isn't that if DSC was good and on HBO that it would be just as big as GoT on HBO.
What I said was that if GoT was on CBSAA, it would be at a disadvantage to good shows on HBO -- simply because HBO has a much larger subscription base.
If Hamilton was only ever staged at a community theater in Peoria, then it most likely never would have achieved the success it did.
So you're the arbiter of who is and isn't a fan, based on their reactions to Discovery?
If Discovery fails, I think it will have more to do with it being on CBS All Access than to The Orville. The show could fail to pull in enough new subscribers because of fans unwilling to pay for another streaming service, especially if they have some reservations about the show's new style. It might have been better to put the show on a regular network where they can get more viewers and with good ratings, be a commercial success.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.