• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC to REBOOT???

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Dennis...no disagreement here. It makes sense too since they're keeping Batman, Inc intact where Bruce has been almost normal (at least normal for him) since he's been back. I just thought it was an interesting way to portray him. I am thinking some fans are gonna get an "All Star Batman and Robin" vibe from "Justice League" Batman lol.
 
Okay, let's ignore the fact that comics solicit writing is probably the lowest form of the English language...
Sorry. Offense taken. I feel utterly insulted. Comics solicit writing keeps food on my table. :)
They paid someone to write that? I just assumed the assistant editor, or possibly Ambush Bug, hammered it out in two minutes!

On the other hand "fancy new sleeves" is conceivably hilarious, if meant as a snide joke!

Seriously, yours may be fine, and not all of them are bad, but 90% of the ones I read are desperate and pandering!

Finally, far too many are written like comic books themselves were written fifty years ago! With exclamation points after every declarative sentence! When you emphasize everything you emphasize nothing!

...

Now, of course, I realize that this is salespersonship and obnoxious hectoring is part and parcel of that art form. I'll also admit to liking the Mr. Terrific solicitation.

The world’s third-smartest man – and one of its most eligible bachelors – uses his brains and fists against science gone mad in MISTER TERRIFIC #1, the new series from writer Eric Wallace and artist Roger Robinson. The cover to issue #1 is by J.G. Jones.
See, no exclamation marks. And it tells you with neither too much hammery nor belabored explanation what the series is about. Oh, the series itself sounds either goofy and cloying or pretentious and lecturing, and may well be all of the above, but it's a well-written invitation.

At the same time, it also subtly delivers the funniest thing I've ever read in a comics solicit. I suppose it's technically true that the guy whose entire superheroic career was launched by his suicide attempt after his wife lost a battle against a moving car is an "eligible bachelor." I hope there's a scene where he walks around showing women a photo of his dead wife like George Costanza did in that episode of Seinfeld.
 
The Mister Terrific solicit does sound fun, which is more than can be said for Wonder Woman which sounds like they rewrote Raimi's Hercules.

Raimi's Hercules Intro
"When the ancient gods were petty and cruel, and they plagued mankind with suffering. Only one man dared to challenge their power: Hercules!"

WW #1
"Gods walk among us. Human lives are playthings to them. Only one woman would dare to protect us from the wrath of such strange and powerful forces."

They could at least try to sound different.
 
What's wrong with the WW description? From the little I've read about it, it looks like the Gods are going to be portrayed as oppressive omnipresent entities and Diana is going to be some kind of human messiah who oppose them. Pretty drastically different take on the character. I know Greg Ruka involved the Gods a lot more in his run. Azzerello seems to like "Darker" takes on characters.
 
What's wrong with the WW description? From the little I've read about it, it looks like the Gods are going to be portrayed as oppressive omnipresent entities and Diana is going to be some kind of human messiah who oppose them. Pretty drastically different take on the character. I know Greg Ruka involved the Gods a lot more in his run. Azzerello seems to like "Darker" takes on characters.
Wrong? In itself nothing, but as a creative piece of writing it so matches the Hercules intro that it sounds like they should give writing credit to whomever did the Hercules intro.

Opposing gods isn't really a different take on the character at all. She was always opposing Ares/Mars plans as well as other evil doing gods ever since Marston created the character. The only difference here would be to portray any or all gods as bad which would undermine the character's origin (the Amazons having been created by those gods.) It also tends to bring the gods in as characters which makes them more or less just another set of characters to wonder why they would be worshiped or be a part of the Amazon's mythos.

I wish Perez had never brought Themyscira into the physical DC universe since it has dragged Wonder Woman into gods and Amazon stories to the point of total self involvement and isolation from the DCU. The third volume got completely bogged down in gods and Amazons with Amazons Attack (The Stench that Never Leaves) and Simone's run became one long Island/god story that made hope of getting away from this stuff less likely than Gilligan and company escaping their island. I'm tired of Wonder Woman's background being the problem and source of drama in her book. Put the island back in limbo and Wonder Woman in the DCU. Like Marston, keep the gods abstract creating the occasional pawn like Silver Swan, but also being of use as they were in creating the Amazons and Diana, but out of the book as recurring characters.
 
Last edited:
I'd disagree with that. He's been one of the best Batman writers in the modern era in my opinion. Just his execution isn't always there in some arcs.

His Batman plays up all the 50s-60s sci-fi/fantasy elements that are anathema to the core of the character and just adds a sheen of "ultraviolence" to pretend its not silver age fan wank. Add in his creation of the whole "with enough prep time Uber-bat can do anything" myth and he's done nothing with the character that rings true to the generally accepted version of who Batman is (the O'Neill, Englehart, Dini, Nolan version of Batman).

I'm happy you enjoy it but I don't and think it does a lot of long term harm to the character.

Not to insult you at all, but when people start using "true version of the character" in an argument is when I usually stop listening.
 
Morrison is simply not a good Batman writer. He is (at least to date) a good Superman writer.

I like Morrison's Batman better than his Superman. I don't get why All Star Superman is so lauded. The story was just okay and I couldn't stand Quitely's artwork. He makes almost everything look lumpy and ugly. Even though I think Morrison went off the rails with Batman RIP and the Return of Bruce Wayne, overall I've enjoyed many of the things he's either added or dabbled with in the Batuniverse.
 
Quietley's Lois is beautiful...or at least the animated movie made her look gorgeous. I think his "lump/ugly" style works for some characters but not others. For some reason I've always been a fan.
 
I will second Darkushs view of All Star Superman. It was an ok story in a Silver Age/Donneresque way but wasnt some awe inspiring piece of work. The art I could take or leave as some panels looked good and others not so much. For the most part I enjoy Morrisons work but find he often gets lost in his own cleverness to the detriment of the story itself.
 
I'd disagree with that. He's been one of the best Batman writers in the modern era in my opinion. Just his execution isn't always there in some arcs.

His Batman plays up all the 50s-60s sci-fi/fantasy elements that are anathema to the core of the character and just adds a sheen of "ultraviolence" to pretend its not silver age fan wank. Add in his creation of the whole "with enough prep time Uber-bat can do anything" myth and he's done nothing with the character that rings true to the generally accepted version of who Batman is (the O'Neill, Englehart, Dini, Nolan version of Batman).

I'm happy you enjoy it but I don't and think it does a lot of long term harm to the character.

Not to insult you at all, but when people start using "true version of the character" in an argument is when I usually stop listening.

Good thing I didn't use it, then.

But, seriously, while I recognize that a character like Batman is versatile, there comes a point where a writer can deviate so much from what you call the "true version" that it stops being about what attracted most people to the character in the first place. For me, at least, Morrison is well past that point.
 
Flipped through the DC 52#1's preview and it sucked. Pretty much just like a solicits list with some minor tid bit descriptions. It does contain a lame five page preview of "Justice League #1" that sucks. It looks like Batman is gonna be portrayed as an ass in the past.

Were you surprised? Geoff Johns is writing. "Hey, Batman's in trrouble, and here's Green Lantern to save him!" I enjoy Johns' GL stuff, but his Batman was an asshole in Rebirth, so I just kind of expected the same here. I'll still pick it up, mostly out of curiosity than hope of it being amazing.
 
Flipped through the DC 52#1's preview and it sucked. Pretty much just like a solicits list with some minor tid bit descriptions. It does contain a lame five page preview of "Justice League #1" that sucks. It looks like Batman is gonna be portrayed as an ass in the past.

I'm also just not a fan of "superheroes are hunted and hated by the public" stories,* which looks to be part of this.

I like Morrison's Batman better than his Superman. I don't get why All Star Superman is so lauded. The story was just okay and I couldn't stand Quitely's artwork. He makes almost everything look lumpy and ugly. Even though I think Morrison went off the rails with Batman RIP and the Return of Bruce Wayne, overall I've enjoyed many of the things he's either added or dabbled with in the Batuniverse.

It's not that it does anything amazing or new; it's that it does everything a Superman story should do exactly right. Especially Luthor.

* Unless it's the X-Men, because it's their deal, and it's because they're mutants. But then I don't actually read X-Men, so there you go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top