Knowing Morrison, it'll be even more convoluted than MJ and Peter.
Morrison tried to do away with the Clark/Lois marriage once before, in the "
Superman 2000" proposal. The interesting thing is that the "solution" Morrison, Mark Millar, Tom Peyer, and Mark Waid came up with really wasn't that different than what JMS and Joe Quesada did in the
Spider-Man books.
In fairness, the memory bomb and Mxy trying to help save Lois' life in the only way he could still would have been more satisfying than a gutless retard trading everything good in his life for a few more months of incontinence and dementia for his aunt. I'm pretty sure Jesus, Friend of Asgard, looks down on that sort of thing.
Even so, the marriage-destroyer in Superman 2000 is only act one of a three act play. You'd think people as bright as Grant Morrison, Mark Millar, Mark Waid, and Joey Bishop would realize that. Throwing out act one of a story with the intention that act two will last forever is, I agree, just about as stupid.
Then again, arguably the weakest parts of All-Star Superman all involve Lois Lane, so I never should have been surprised. They're beautiful, I'll hear you say; yeah, that's true, but there's an ugly undercurrent to them, a character who calls herself Lois Lane who loves Superman for what he can do, and maybe specifically what he can do for her, not who he is. It's all part of the Tarantino School of Misunderstanding Superman.
Admiral Young said:
The other rumor that Bleeding Cool reported last week was that Clark and Diana are getting together.
Which, of course, is horrible. Principally for Diana. It's better than
Batman and Diana (given the incongruity in their methods and missions, they should really barely
like each other), but it's still pretty bad because of its fan-servicey implications and the implication that Wonder Woman needs a metahuman to get off.