Hmmm...yes...and yet, that's where we are at.Which I still see as being an incredibly selfish desire as whomever does so is risking their career as well as major civil and criminal repercussions.
Hmmm...yes...and yet, that's where we are at.Which I still see as being an incredibly selfish desire as whomever does so is risking their career as well as major civil and criminal repercussions.
The expectation is for people to break an NDA or other work related contract so that fans can see the precious.
That's too easy.Anyone advocating this should immediately be dismissed as a bottom-feeding troll.
"OUR" only chance to see it? Who here worked on the film?
Which I still see as being an incredibly selfish desire as whomever does so is risking their career as well as major civil and criminal repercussions.
Anyone advocating this should immediately be dismissed as a bottom-feeding troll.
Do seem to indicate an actual desire to NOT have the film be available for the public to see. And I can't seem to fathom this kind of feeling towards an unseen film, especially from a person who was a major proponent of the Snyder Cut movement...and anyone identified as one of the participants in a leak should face the legal consequences for such an act.
I don't expect from any individual to break an NDA to leak the movie. I don't actively endorse any such action, and I certainly don't want anybody to risk their career and/or freedom just to see a movie. However, and that has been my position from the start (and, as far as I could follow, the position of many others in this thread) that I wouldn't be surprised at all if the movie did leak, because people in the movie industry are usually very passionate about projects they've worked on, and do have a desire - irrational or not - to have people see it, and if it did leak, that I would want to see it.
Reading through the thread, I don't know who is being referred to. I haven't seen anybody seriously demanding cast and/or crew to break the law. So, can you really fault me for concluding that the kind of stance I myself laid out has been misinterpreted?You're not who is being referred to then, so why take offense?
Dan Lin, the executive-turned-producer who counts hits such as the live-action Aladdin, The Lego Movie, and the It horror movies, is in talks to take the role of DC chief, multiple sources tell THR.
The role encompasses not just overseeing film but television as well, with Lin reporting directly to Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav, according to sources.
The structure bypasses three separate division heads — Warner Bros. Pictures’ Michael De Luca and Pam Abdy, HBO/HBO Max chief Casey Bloys and Warner Bros. TV chair Channing Dungey — and puts control of DC in the hands of one person.
Only legally and in line with WB.Do seem to indicate an actual desire to NOT have the film be available for the public to see.
Well, he seems to have a diverse resume.
Yes.But do you honestly care if the movie is leaked? Really?
Because I would like WB to have a shot at recovering and the people who worked hard on the film to continue being employed.Okay.
Why, though?
What rules? Basically tax evasion rules? Disgraceful take. Simply disgraceful.Because I would like WB to have a shot at recovering and the people who worked hard on the film to continue being employed.
The leak carries a risk and devil may care attitude towards rules I find aggravating. Will it impact my life? No, but it gets under my skin.
And I can't seem to fathom this kind of feeling towards an unseen film, especially from a person who was a major proponent of the Snyder Cut movement
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.