About the same.Hey...I kinda skipped the bulk of the messages... I had a question...how violent is Dark Phoenix compared to Apocalypse?
About the same.Hey...I kinda skipped the bulk of the messages... I had a question...how violent is Dark Phoenix compared to Apocalypse?
This review makes me
How could they try telling this story once, mess it up, and then repeat the same mistakes?
X-Men: Apocalypse. As a self-contained movie, I don't think it was worse than mediocre, but, all considered, it was a pretty impressive act of self-sabotage:What do you guys think held the new movies back?
But even then, not really. Mystique's power is just to look like someone/thing else, not to actually copy their powers. Rogue should have been the focal point of the drama.Keeping J-Law around: DoFP was written around Mystique in a way that was convenient to Lawrence's stardom, but at least made sense.
But even then, not really. Mystique's power is just to look like someone/thing else, not to actually copy their powers. Rogue should have been the focal point of the drama.
Everything you said. Top marks.X-Men: Apocalypse. As a self-contained movie, I don't think it was worse than mediocre, but, all considered, it was a pretty impressive act of self-sabotage:
- It basically destroyed Magneto as a character. He wimps out on his big White House announcement (following his stated intent at the end of First Class) to lead a mutant movement to live a quiet life of a rural blue-collar worker? Lame. And then he becomes some new baddie's stooge? Lamer. And then, after presumably killing tens of thousands with his worldwide magnetic antics, Charles calls him "old friend" and lets him walk free?! This isn't a supervillain, this is an annoying neighbor in a sitcom.
- This has the side effect of making Xavier look like an idiot.
- And the international community, to boot.
- Keeping J-Law around: DoFP was written around Mystique in a way that was convenient to Lawrence's stardom, but at least made sense. But she hangs around Apocalypse, and becomes a leader of the X-Men, for no good reason. This is Fox saying Lawrence's stardom is more important than story integrity. (Also, they should have recast her for her refusal to wear the makeup. I don't blame her one bit for being over all that, but Fox wasn't obligated to keep her on.)
- The new class: with Wolverine out of the picture, a rogue (no pun intended) X-person was necessary to balance out the bland goodness of the new kids. Not only did Apocalypse not even attempt this, it included Logan himself to highlight said gap. This is Fox saying they think they can coast on name recognition and familiar characters for their heroes.
- En Sabah Nur: defying common sense and the OT Star Wars/MCU example, this movie pulled the most powerful enemy ever out of thin air, in-universe wise, without hinting or building up to him. And then they went all-in on a fantastically elaborate (and, to be fair, accomplished) makeup job on a normal-sized actor, when it was clear that a CG giant a la Thanos was not only entirely doable, but dramatically necessary. This is Fox refusing to break new ground, and enlarge the scope of its X-world.
The DoFP follow-up should have been about Erik going full Magneto supervillain, with a futuristic Genosha, Asteroid M, all that stuff, with hints towards Apocalypse and alien civilizations. Had they taken a big swing in that direction, even if it took an additional year, they would have beaten Infinity War to theaters by a year. If they'd done so, and said movie had lived up to DoFP box-office and critics-wise, well... the Fox thing would probably still have happened and doomed the franchise, to be honest. But they'd have had time to make one last, fourth First Class movie, that might not have opened to a series low and lost money.
But even then, not really. Mystique's power is just to look like someone/thing else, not to actually copy their powers. Rogue should have been the focal point of the drama.
Finally saw it.
I went thru the whole beginning of the film wondering why Mistique was in a position to give Jennifer Lawrence Speeches™ to the X-Men, when she's supposed to be a damn villain.
With Apocalypse and Dark Phoenix, you have more incongruities that don't mesh.To the point of the original trilogy of movies can't even have happened at all.
In FC she hid in the Blackbird, until Magneto killed Shaw.
Right? Oh, and, of course, shape-changing aliens. All aliens must be shape-shifters. All the D'Bari did in the comic was get wiped out, here the survivors are shape-shifting avengers of their race.This review makes me
How could they try telling this story once, mess it up, and then repeat the same mistakes?
Rogue wasn't born yet, and they did establish it took several decades for the sentinels to become the ultimate shape-shifting baddie versions of themselves. I agree it's not a perfect reason, but it's solid enough for story purposes, and it gave DoFP an ending that, as much as I love the MCU, the MCU's never had - a story climax that hinges on a moral choice, to forgo an act of righteous vengeance.But even then, not really. Mystique's power is just to look like someone/thing else, not to actually copy their powers. Rogue should have been the focal point of the drama.
Indeed.The best thing about Mystique, is they could've recast her with a new actress (because, you know, shapeshifter) and no one would've cared.
It's been a while, and i remember wondering why she was a good guy back then too. Maybe I forgot a lot (understandably) but this time she was full-on team leader and moral lecturer. If she was before, I forgot, I guess. It really hit me in the face this time.I guess you skipped the prior two movies, then.
X3 - Both of Jean's parents are alive and living with her as a younger child than Sophie Turner, who portayed her as 80s Jean In Apocalypse. Jean's mom would've had to die prior to the Wolverine going back in time and changing the timeline.Do what now?
DistractionYou're forgetting something.
It's been a while, and i remember wondering why she was a good guy back then too. Maybe I forgot a lot (understandably) but this time she was full-on team leader and moral lecturer. If she was before, I forgot, I guess. It really hit me in the face this time.
Why would leadership depend on power level... Is the general always the best shooter in the real world?This is all you need to see. ̶J̶e̶n̶n̶i̶f̶e̶r̶ ̶L̶a̶w̶r̶e̶n̶c̶e̶/̶K̶a̶t̶i̶n̶i̶s̶s̶ ̶E̶v̶e̶r̶d̶e̶e̶n̶ Mystique is made the official leader of the X-Men.
X3 - Both of Jean's parents are alive and living with her as a younger child than Sophie Turner, who portayed her as 80s Jean In Apocalypse. Jean's mom would've had to die prior to the Wolverine going back in time and changing the timeline.
Jean dies in the 90s but died in X3 in the 2000s.
Jean is giving a speech at the start of X1 to congress about the emergence of mutants. But Apocalypse and Dark Phoenix has them out in public. Like it's no big deal.
Stryker was exposed and arrested by Moira McTaggert at the end of Apocalypse. I very seriously doubt Stryker will be able to be meeting with the president in the 2000s and kick off the events of X2.
There are other incongruities, but you get the idea
if people didn't insist on being incessantly nitpicky.
At that point in the story (Apocalypse), what qualifications did Mystique have as leader?Why would leadership depend on power level... Is the general always the best shooter in the real world?
It's been awhile since I've seen Apocalypse, but I don't recall Stryker being arrested.
These things are incongruities to you.
The vast majority of the 'problems' people find with the XMCU wouldn't exist if people didn't insist on being incessantly nitpicky.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.