So, does my idea sound more sane or what?
Compressing Space Time into an Hour Glass
- Thread starter Dryson
- Start date
Way too sane. It also needs to be couched in mathematics that only a handful of people can understand.
For a reaction to take place fuel must be present as well as an ignition source. Matter and Anti-matter both having mass could not have existed prior to the Big Bang as they would have needed a source added to them to create their energetic structures that would have been present in the fields of space strands.
That is unless anti-matter and matter is a result of Quantum field strings entangling to create the reaction.
That is unless anti-matter and matter is a result of Quantum field strings entangling to create the reaction.
We assume that primordial space, x, is filled with a medium of permeability, that as such has not been defined but because of the Universes current system of energy said primordial energies or strands of space fields would be caused by currents. Currents passing through the function to become the Big Bang.
Sometimes - I wonder if he has us blocked out or..?
Testing, testing... Is this thing on?
Testing, testing... Is this thing on?
I discovered in the past that the same content was being posted on other sites. I haven't checked lately to see if this is still the case. I've also found it's a waste of time refuting the arguments point by point.
At least, it's not creationism, flat earth theories, nor moon landing hoax theories that are being peddled. The science may be completely bogus but it's so illogical, incoherent, and incomprehensible that it might as well be randomly generated noise. I don't see any prospect of it going viral.
At least, it's not creationism, flat earth theories, nor moon landing hoax theories that are being peddled. The science may be completely bogus but it's so illogical, incoherent, and incomprehensible that it might as well be randomly generated noise. I don't see any prospect of it going viral.
We believe the space-time manifold itself can expand faster than the speed of light. As a result, Alcubierre-type warp drives might be possible if we could harness negative mass-energy to distort space-time in a directional manner. How one does that, I have no real idea but if we understood dark energy better, it might provide more insight.
Alcubierre suggests that the Casimir effect demonstrates that it might be possible to create suitable mechanisms to manipulate the effective energy of the vacuum.
The suspicion is that a unified theory of General Relativity and quantum fields would preclude such a drive from being feasible as it would break causality.
ETA: Feasible as an FTL drive, that is. It might work as a sublight drive but I'm not sure what the implications are for effects such as time dilation. I assume the space-time warping must have an effect. If I have time, I might look up Alcubierre's published papers to see if this is discussed. See ***
***At sublight speeds, the general thinking is that clocks tick at the same speed as an observer who was in the same frame of reference as when the spaceship left - there is no apparent acceleration so there is no time dilation. At speeds greater than c, time travel becomes possible so time dilation is not an issue.
Alcubierre suggests that the Casimir effect demonstrates that it might be possible to create suitable mechanisms to manipulate the effective energy of the vacuum.
The suspicion is that a unified theory of General Relativity and quantum fields would preclude such a drive from being feasible as it would break causality.
ETA: Feasible as an FTL drive, that is. It might work as a sublight drive but I'm not sure what the implications are for effects such as time dilation. I assume the space-time warping must have an effect. If I have time, I might look up Alcubierre's published papers to see if this is discussed. See ***
***At sublight speeds, the general thinking is that clocks tick at the same speed as an observer who was in the same frame of reference as when the spaceship left - there is no apparent acceleration so there is no time dilation. At speeds greater than c, time travel becomes possible so time dilation is not an issue.
Last edited:
That might relate to the variability of the fine-structure "constant", alpha, which is a dimensionless quantity that involves the speed of light and has the approximate value 1/137. The experimental results for the variability of alpha over space and time are disputed. The principal investigators are Barrow and Webb I believe.
The speed of light might also differ with energy (and therefore, frequency) if space-time is quantised, although experimental results appear not to have found any significant dependence on frequency.
Last edited:
That's pretty typical for such topics. Sometimes people rush to publication and their analysis turns out to be based on systematic errors or flaky data. An example being polarisation in the CMBR that turned out to be due to much more local dust.
We assume that primordial space, x, is filled with a medium of permeability, that as such has not been defined but because of the Universes current system of energy said primordial energies or strands of space fields would be caused by currents. Currents passing through the function to become the Big Bang.
If the same energies present in Einsteins Universe weren't present as fields of space prior to the Big Bang then the energies that are atoms would not be present in our Universe. A house is only timbers and blocks, walls and nails that are a house but not until assembled.
Particles are the same they are not atoms until assembled but atoms prior to being assembled, in a different state until passing through the function of the Lambda that is unknown, that something that is unknown that needs a home, that needs structure. That unknown function being life, all life on Earth. The same particles that humans are made of all come from the Table of Elements that is proven. Therefore our being our existence existed in the same state that atoms were, unformed but knowing that something was taking place, directing that change because we wanted to be something different, something that was tired of traveling infinity at the speed of infinity, something that wanted to build and enjoy what it could only be part of on the other side of the function.
If particles don't travel at the speed of infinity, particles that include our DNA make-up, then we would have already have found signs of life coming together after the Big Bang much like we can detect a field of asteroids after a meteor impact, where the whole becomes the parts and then the whole again as a new entity.
A new entity of smaller and smaller parts that when passed back through the function equates to the whole.
So yes Einstein was wrong that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.
Faith is not arrogance. Not equating correctly is arrogance based on trying to trap everyone in the function of Einsteins Lambda Calculus.
If the same energies present in Einsteins Universe weren't present as fields of space prior to the Big Bang then the energies that are atoms would not be present in our Universe. A house is only timbers and blocks, walls and nails that are a house but not until assembled.
Particles are the same they are not atoms until assembled but atoms prior to being assembled, in a different state until passing through the function of the Lambda that is unknown, that something that is unknown that needs a home, that needs structure. That unknown function being life, all life on Earth. The same particles that humans are made of all come from the Table of Elements that is proven. Therefore our being our existence existed in the same state that atoms were, unformed but knowing that something was taking place, directing that change because we wanted to be something different, something that was tired of traveling infinity at the speed of infinity, something that wanted to build and enjoy what it could only be part of on the other side of the function.
If particles don't travel at the speed of infinity, particles that include our DNA make-up, then we would have already have found signs of life coming together after the Big Bang much like we can detect a field of asteroids after a meteor impact, where the whole becomes the parts and then the whole again as a new entity.
A new entity of smaller and smaller parts that when passed back through the function equates to the whole.
So yes Einstein was wrong that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.
Faith is not arrogance. Not equating correctly is arrogance based on trying to trap everyone in the function of Einsteins Lambda Calculus.
Lambda calculus was devised by Alonzo Church, not by Albert Einstein.
Starting to wonder if we are talking to a bot... Just sayin'!
We can assume that the field of space traveling at FTL velocities was compressed into a singularity causing the Big Bang that created two halves of the whole, one whole being our Universe and another whole being another universe.
As the two expanding universes reached their point of zero matter compression the two halves split into two parts with the greater mass at the leading edge of each expanse. The trailing edge then eventually caught up to form the oval shape of the Universe. There should be more mass on one side of the Universe.
This is theorectically sound as it has been proven that for a few miliseconds after the Big Bang matter expanded faster than the speed of light which should prove that primordial space functions at faster than light speed velocities.
As the two expanding universes reached their point of zero matter compression the two halves split into two parts with the greater mass at the leading edge of each expanse. The trailing edge then eventually caught up to form the oval shape of the Universe. There should be more mass on one side of the Universe.
This is theorectically sound as it has been proven that for a few miliseconds after the Big Bang matter expanded faster than the speed of light which should prove that primordial space functions at faster than light speed velocities.
Last edited:
I treat it as Beat poetry rather than science.
Similar threads
