Yeah - I dig it man...
Compressing Space Time into an Hour Glass
- Thread starter Dryson
- Start date
If matter cannot exist at faster then light speed velocities, then explain why we cant detect light from just beyond our own Universes leading edge?
There is always a gap between particles interacting with each that is very close to the speed of light just like there was a small gap of faster than light speed velocities that matter traveled right after the big bang until they slowed down.
Therefore for in order for space time to exist there must be matter traveling faster than the speed of light that drops down an energu level into particles traveling slower than the speed of light.
There is always a gap between particles interacting with each that is very close to the speed of light just like there was a small gap of faster than light speed velocities that matter traveled right after the big bang until they slowed down.
Therefore for in order for space time to exist there must be matter traveling faster than the speed of light that drops down an energu level into particles traveling slower than the speed of light.
Nonsense, there are parts of the universe we've not been able to detect because no light of those parts has reached us yet, we only know the observable universe, we can't see the leading edge of the universe simply because it is too far away.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe
Space-time can expand faster than the speed of light and carry matter with it. The distance to the farthest observable matter is not termed the edge of the universe, it's variously termed the cosmological horizon, particle horizon, comoving horizon, or cosmic light horizon. (I admit it's annoying that cosmologists appear unable to settle on a single name.) From the practically zero curvature of space-time overall, it is deduced that the universe must be much larger than the distance to this horizon.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_horizon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_horizon
Here is what the Speed of Light looks like at 10 trillion FPS
https://mashable.com/video/speed-of-light-10-trillion-fps-slow-mo-guys/#dYNVBzTL6Zql
At 4:33 of the video the blue laser light can be seen passing through the bottle of water as a manifold.
In mathematics, a manifold is a topological space that locally resembles Euclidean space near each point. More precisely, each point of an n-dimensional manifold has a neighbourhood that is homeomorphic to the Euclidean space of dimension n. In this more precise terminology, a manifold is referred to as an n-manifold.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold
Fields similar to one created by the blue laser light would have existed prior too the Big Bang and still exist on the outside of our Universe today.
Just like I stated above the fields of space passing through another media, similar to the blue laser light passing through the water in the bottle, the fields of space traveling faster than the speed of light would have mass that would stretch for trillions of light years in length but would only be a nano second in width. When another space field encountered the first space field both traveling at FTL speed velocities what happened? The same thing that happens during a car crash.
Both cars suddenly stop and pieces of each car continue to travel in all directions until the stored energy potential transferred from the car dissipates and the pieces come to a state of rest.
Therefore when the two space fields collided pieces of each field continued to travel in all directions until the energy transferred from the two space fields came to a state of rest.
So basically the Universe is in a state of expanding outwards like the pieces of the two cars until the transferred energy potential dissipates bringing the Universe into a steady state of rest. The Universe itself will still exist as will all of the planets, because like the pieces of the two cars that were once part of the whole, those car pieces still contain active energetic reactions that bind the broken pieces together as a whole. Just like the pieces of the Universe, galaxies, solar systems, planets, make up the whole of a single piece of collision debris from the Big Bang.
"Captain"
"Yes, Ensign."
"We have ten Savior class destroyers entering the stream."
"Are we able to hide in the urinary sar sysem that we scanned before we left orbit?"
"Captain...really."
https://mashable.com/video/speed-of-light-10-trillion-fps-slow-mo-guys/#dYNVBzTL6Zql
At 4:33 of the video the blue laser light can be seen passing through the bottle of water as a manifold.
In mathematics, a manifold is a topological space that locally resembles Euclidean space near each point. More precisely, each point of an n-dimensional manifold has a neighbourhood that is homeomorphic to the Euclidean space of dimension n. In this more precise terminology, a manifold is referred to as an n-manifold.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold
Fields similar to one created by the blue laser light would have existed prior too the Big Bang and still exist on the outside of our Universe today.
Just like I stated above the fields of space passing through another media, similar to the blue laser light passing through the water in the bottle, the fields of space traveling faster than the speed of light would have mass that would stretch for trillions of light years in length but would only be a nano second in width. When another space field encountered the first space field both traveling at FTL speed velocities what happened? The same thing that happens during a car crash.
Both cars suddenly stop and pieces of each car continue to travel in all directions until the stored energy potential transferred from the car dissipates and the pieces come to a state of rest.
Therefore when the two space fields collided pieces of each field continued to travel in all directions until the energy transferred from the two space fields came to a state of rest.
So basically the Universe is in a state of expanding outwards like the pieces of the two cars until the transferred energy potential dissipates bringing the Universe into a steady state of rest. The Universe itself will still exist as will all of the planets, because like the pieces of the two cars that were once part of the whole, those car pieces still contain active energetic reactions that bind the broken pieces together as a whole. Just like the pieces of the Universe, galaxies, solar systems, planets, make up the whole of a single piece of collision debris from the Big Bang.
"Captain"
"Yes, Ensign."
"We have ten Savior class destroyers entering the stream."
"Are we able to hide in the urinary sar sysem that we scanned before we left orbit?"
"Captain...really."
Last edited:
Whatever...
Isn't "sar" Hungarian for "mud"?
Isn't "sar" Hungarian for "mud"?
Last edited:
If you have ever studied life sciences the fetus grows inside of the womb surrounded by a placenta. It begins as microscopic cells that eventually grow into a visible human being or animal.
The Universe before the big bang would be no different. The placenta, fields of space out the outside of our Universe expand like the Universe does to allow the potential for growth to exist.
Therefore the process of the fetus developing in a womb is very similar to the nothingness before the big bang.
The Universe before the big bang would be no different. The placenta, fields of space out the outside of our Universe expand like the Universe does to allow the potential for growth to exist.
Therefore the process of the fetus developing in a womb is very similar to the nothingness before the big bang.
Fertilization happens when a sperm enters the egg and the embryo starts to form. Two cells divide and become four, the four cells divide and become eight, and so on. By the time the cluster of cells reaches the uterus and settles down into the lining ofthe uterus, it has become an embryo.
If we apply the same process prior to the Big Bang there would have been field of space that was similar to the male sperm in so much that the field of space contained material and frequencies of energy that when it encountered the female field of space the two sets of material interacted in such a manner that caused new particles to form that rapidly divided to create the Big Bang.
I'm not saying that man and woman came together prior to the Big Bang but the process is similar to how life on Earth functions, accept in those animals that reproduce internally and don't need a mate. Such animal or insects could viewed as a symbiotic relationship where a single field of space functions as its own nursery and does not need another field of space to interact with it in order to create a Big Bang.
If we apply the same process prior to the Big Bang there would have been field of space that was similar to the male sperm in so much that the field of space contained material and frequencies of energy that when it encountered the female field of space the two sets of material interacted in such a manner that caused new particles to form that rapidly divided to create the Big Bang.
I'm not saying that man and woman came together prior to the Big Bang but the process is similar to how life on Earth functions, accept in those animals that reproduce internally and don't need a mate. Such animal or insects could viewed as a symbiotic relationship where a single field of space functions as its own nursery and does not need another field of space to interact with it in order to create a Big Bang.
Sanity is over rated!
MWAHAHAHAHA!!! Woohoo...
MWAHAHAHAHA!!! Woohoo...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmogony
Stephen Hawking has said that "Since events before the Big Bang have no observational consequences, one may as well cut them out of the theory, and say that time began at the Big Bang. Events before the Big Bang, are simply not defined, because there's no way one could measure what happened at them."
Didn't Stephen Hawkings also say that God didn't need to exist for the Universe too be?
He said that the events before the Big Bang are simply not defined, because there's no way one could measure what happened at them.
Based on what I have read mass cannot exist without a source. Therefore meaning that before the Big Bang some type of mass would had to have existed in the form of fields of space in order to create the Big Bang.
A light photon travels at the speed of light and does not have any mass. So theoretically light could have traveled the Void around our Universe without any problems at all. The only problem is that in order for light to travel in the Void prior too the Big Bang a star would had to have been present. But since stars have been proven to only exist after the Big Bang occurred then light would not have been traveling through the Void by itself.
However fields of space that had mass would have in fact been present and since space is infinite there would be a near infinite number of space fields in space traveling faster than the speed of light. Such fields would have like the photon in the video below when passing close to other fields would have created manifolds like the photon did when passing through the bottle of water.
The manifolds of different matter and mass then interacted with each other similar to how the Higgs fields bridges between electrons. Over time each space field collected more and more manifold particles that interacted with the other particles that eventually one day created the Big Bang.
Here is what the Speed of Light looks like at 10 trillion FPS
https://mashable.com/video/speed-of-light-10-trillion-fps-slow-mo-guys/#dYNVBzTL6Zql
Stephen Hawking has said that "Since events before the Big Bang have no observational consequences, one may as well cut them out of the theory, and say that time began at the Big Bang. Events before the Big Bang, are simply not defined, because there's no way one could measure what happened at them."
Didn't Stephen Hawkings also say that God didn't need to exist for the Universe too be?
He said that the events before the Big Bang are simply not defined, because there's no way one could measure what happened at them.
Based on what I have read mass cannot exist without a source. Therefore meaning that before the Big Bang some type of mass would had to have existed in the form of fields of space in order to create the Big Bang.
A light photon travels at the speed of light and does not have any mass. So theoretically light could have traveled the Void around our Universe without any problems at all. The only problem is that in order for light to travel in the Void prior too the Big Bang a star would had to have been present. But since stars have been proven to only exist after the Big Bang occurred then light would not have been traveling through the Void by itself.
However fields of space that had mass would have in fact been present and since space is infinite there would be a near infinite number of space fields in space traveling faster than the speed of light. Such fields would have like the photon in the video below when passing close to other fields would have created manifolds like the photon did when passing through the bottle of water.
The manifolds of different matter and mass then interacted with each other similar to how the Higgs fields bridges between electrons. Over time each space field collected more and more manifold particles that interacted with the other particles that eventually one day created the Big Bang.
Here is what the Speed of Light looks like at 10 trillion FPS
https://mashable.com/video/speed-of-light-10-trillion-fps-slow-mo-guys/#dYNVBzTL6Zql
Do you just click things and regurgitate Word McNuggets?
None of it appears to have any awareness of scientific methodology. Frankly, it's a word collage. To understand it probably requires brain salad surgery.
Surgery? Like a high speed impact with a blunt object ?
Much worse -- prog rock in all its pomp.
Last edited:
A space field similar to a Higgs Field was likely present before the Big Bang. Once again a space field being foundation particle mass moving faster than the speed of light that collided and resulted in slower than light interactions.
If the Higgs is considered the God particle then where did the Higgs get its mass from?
God is not the answer either because in order to create one must have mass.
If the Higgs is considered the God particle then where did the Higgs get its mass from?
God is not the answer either because in order to create one must have mass.
Lo and behold:
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/30732/how-does-the-higgs-boson-gain-mass-itself
You are way out of your depth. Perhaps it's time to find a new outlet for your energies?
Last edited:
Tachyons are hypothetical particles that travel faster than light. According to Einstein’s special theory of relativity – and according to experiment so far – in our ‘real’ world, particles can never travel faster than light. Which is just as well: if they did, our ideas about cause and effect would be thrown out the window, because it would be possible to see an effect manifest before its cause.
We already see the affect manifesting in this case the Big Bang and out Universe.
Basically Einstein is saying that it is illegal to get involved before a Universal event takes place and that humans can only observe and record the effect.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/...lain-dark-matter-dark-energy-and-the-big-bang
Therefore It is possible that a field of space can in fact travel faster than the speed of light.
We already see the affect manifesting in this case the Big Bang and out Universe.
Basically Einstein is saying that it is illegal to get involved before a Universal event takes place and that humans can only observe and record the effect.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/...lain-dark-matter-dark-energy-and-the-big-bang
Therefore It is possible that a field of space can in fact travel faster than the speed of light.
Similar threads
