TNG looks like a product of the late 80s/early 90s in every aspect and that needn’t be a negative.
Right, and that is annoying, but they were at least trying. They were giving us something. Today they’re too creatively lazy. There’s an end of history hubris/decadence to it.Honestly, when I look at that screencap from AGT, it practically screams 1990s to me. Maybe that's not what Average Joe wore as he strolled down the street of the 1990s, but that is definitely what John Hollywood would visualize as "futuristic" in the 90s.
Exactly how I feel. Everything ages, but they tried at least.Right, and that is annoying, but they were at least trying. They were giving us something. Today they’re too creatively lazy. There’s an end of history hubris/decadence to it.
I don’t think they look foul. Picard’d does, but what’s wrong with Geordi’s? And Data is in a British inspired suit per his current position at Cambridge. Up the production budget to DSC’s and they’d be amazing.
Right, and that is annoying, but they were at least trying. They were giving us something. Today they’re too creatively lazy.
I think those were designed to make them look older.The waistline on Beverly's uniform makes it look like she's wearing trousers up to her armpits. And Data looks like he wears some of those trousers under a babydoll nightie.
Only Geordi comes out of that ok.
I prefer the Rios and Book pictures, hands down. So much easier to take seriously.
Already discussed. We’re talking casual outfits, not uniforms.The waistline on Beverly's uniform makes it look like she's wearing trousers up to her armpits.
I’m not sure I understand what this means, but I think Data looks fine.And Data looks like he wears some of those trousers under a babydoll nightie.
Han Solo and the guy from a thousand years from now who looks like the guy outside the club last night? Let’s agree to disagree.I prefer the Rios and Book pictures, hands down. So much easier to take seriously.
They're trying at something, they’re trying at cool, and they’re infusing a bit of, a hint of, a veil of futurism…but it’s like they’re embarrassed by the genre. By the period they’re trying to present. This is more a failure of the producers than the costumers, just following orders.I'm afraid I don't hold to the notion that the modern designers aren't trying.
? And you liking them doesn’t equate to the outfits being realistic for the distant future.You not liking it doesn't equate to us being given nothing or them being lazy.
I'm glad you do. I wish more of us today were wearing similarly interesting outfits. So many mass-produced fashions are dull. But then both couture and popular affordable clothiers like Zara offer more out-there options.I, like many others, prefer the modern take.
And you liking them doesn’t equate to the outfits being realistic for the distant future.
I'm glad you do. I wish more of us today were wearing similarly interesting outfits. So many mass-produced fashions are dull. But then both couture and popular affordable clothiers like Zara offer more out-there options.
I’m not sure where you’re coming from. My opinion is mine and yours is yours and we both get to have each. I like both looks above (Rios’s and Book’s) quite a bit, but I take issue with their being of their supposed time. Something being futuristic is subjective, but not entirely. You don’t get to say that any design is futuristic and have your opinion count the same as someone else’s if you’re being disingenuous in it, or if you’re plainly wrong.In my post I didn't say that was the case though. More that you disliking them doesn't mean laziness on the part of the producers. Whether or not they look futuristic is entirely subjective, your opinion carries as much weight as mine.
You’re focusing too much on my personal dislike. Plainly look at the outfits, look at fashion from 400 or 1000 years ago, consider that the world will likely change exponentially with time and technological change as we move ahead, and consider what they were wearing twenty years ago. Maybe there was a freak revival of 400 year old outfits and vastly inferior zipper technology and whatnot, or it’s just a TV show and they were going for something more stylized and contemporary and less realistic and futuristic.I don't however see how a dislike equates to laziness on their part.
That’s pretty cool. I wish we had affordable tailors around here but that’s not the case, at least not on my public servant salary.I get the impression you're dressy and I like that. So am I and I love wearing unusual stuff. Fortunately living in Vietnam I have an affordable tailor who makes bespoke outfits for me. :-)
The cape is fine, the hat doesn't really convey the message that I'm the representative of Earth.Ah, the extremes of DISCO fashion
![]()
![]()
I’m not sure where you’re coming from. My opinion is mine and yours is yours and we both get to have each. I like both looks above (Rios’s and Book’s) quite a bit, but I take issue with their being of their supposed time.
You’re focusing too much on my personal dislike. Plainly look at the outfits, look at fashion from 400 or 1000 years ago, consider that the world will likely change exponentially with time and technological change as we move ahead, and consider what they were wearing twenty years ago.
And the technology of the 32nd century nowhere near matches the rate of change during the live action years, let alone reality. There were slipstream drives, artificial quantum singularities, quantum torpedoes, Batmobile armor, all invented within the span of how many years, and yet they’re still using photon and quantum torpedoes and everything else 1000 years later.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.