• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Canon, Continuity, and Pike's Accident

Good to know where you stand. I wished you had also written that I had put forth two continuities due to changes introduced by the showrunner as an alternative to the back and forth over the differences between April in TAS and SNW. The thread you started over here is us just going back and forth about how we both deal with the differences.

I too am looking forward to what happens in Season 2.
Your position is for you to state; the OP was lengthy enough as-is, and the original thread is linked-to, in all its glory or... digression. However, if I've misrepresented your position, please say so!
 
I thought it was obvious what was meant, but I'll rephrase.

Which external realization of the NCC-1701 Enterprise is your favorite?​

That's realization in the sense of "The result of an artistic effort" [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/realization#Noun].

Mine is the original VFX TOS version with the ping-pong balls in the back of the nacelles. The TMP refit is a close second. :techman:

I prefer the TOS original VFX version as well, especially the one that can change modes between the sphere at the end and the grille. :whistle::D

I'd build whatever that person wanted me to build.

And that person will say, "THE Enterprise!" :D

Your position is for you to state; the OP was lengthy enough as-is, and the original thread is linked-to, in all its glory or... digression. However, if I've misrepresented your position, please say so!

I'll say you could've done better with the setup. :)
 
And now, to my proposal. I believe that, given the negative consequences in "A Quality of Mercy," Pike will resign himself not to try to avoid the accident or prevent any of the cadets from showing up. Rather, when it finally happens, even though he's been burned already, Pike's going to choose to stay inside and try to rescue everyone he can, including the two cadets that he believes are fated to die, the two he's been haunted about all along. It's this heroic act that Mendez will recall. It will be the one that seals Pike's fate and consigns him to the wheelchair. In other words, what we've seen so far in the snippets of the accident isn't enough to put Pike in that chair.

I think this has been foreshadowed by everything we've seen. I also think one cannot hang their hat on a few brief scenes of flash-forward, such as the ones presented in "Through the Valley of Shadows." In SNW, they've explicitly made the point that the future can be changed—with consequence. And we know that Pike is being moved to try to save the cadets.

So, what say you?

Is mine a plausible scenario?

Ooh. I like this idea. I like the motivation behind it. It speaks to the character of the man.
 
The possibility of the ship undergoing upgrades over time to account for the evolution of the model went out the window when stock footage showing different states of the model started getting used all in the same episode. That was pretty early on. @Tallguy might be able to tell us just how early.
Day One. Where No Man Has Gone Before used footage of The Cage. As did The Corbomite Maneuver AND The Man Trap (depending on your definition of Day One). Most episodes ended with the final shot of the Enterprise from Where No Man Has Gone Before. Heck, the season 2 and 3 opening credits are exclusively footage from the pilots.

I think it was our own @aridas sofia (who will no doubt be annoyed at being invoked in a SNW thread :) ) who first put pen to paper in a sort of "Grand Unified Theory of Enterprise Evolution" - including publishing a packet of drawings called The Enterprise Heavy Cruiser Evolution Blueprints. Although the various "classes" of Enterprise (Constitution, Bonhomme Richard, Achernar, and of course Enterprise) had been showing up in his work through the mid 1980's.

It's a lovely idea, but it's not really borne out by the literal footage.
 
Looking through your comprehensive catalog of VFX shots it would appear that the version with the rectangular end covers on the nacelles only appears in "The Cage" while the sphere cap and grilled nacelle versions alternate within the regular episodes with the 33" sprinkled in. I personally like to think of the ship changing operating modes like a sailing ship adjusting her sails and such since that is more exciting (to me) than the mostly static ships of the series with blinking lights. But that is totally my personal preference. :)

Day One. Where No Man Has Gone Before used footage of The Cage. As did The Corbomite Maneuver AND The Man Trap (depending on your definition of Day One). Most episodes ended with the final shot of the Enterprise from Where No Man Has Gone Before. Heck, the season 2 and 3 opening credits are exclusively footage from the pilots.

I think it was our own @aridas sofia (who will no doubt be annoyed at being invoked in a SNW thread :) ) who first put pen to paper in a sort of "Grand Unified Theory of Enterprise Evolution" - including publishing a packet of drawings called The Enterprise Heavy Cruiser Evolution Blueprints. Although the various "classes" of Enterprise (Constitution, Bonhomme Richard, Achernar, and of course Enterprise) had been showing up in his work through the mid 1980's.

It's a lovely idea, but it's not really borne out by the literal footage.
 
Last edited:
I'd suggest it was even earlier than that! The Cage used both the 11-foot and the 33-inch models to represent the same ship, despite significant differences on the lower saucer
That gets into "How many Millenium Falcons are there" territory. They're contemporary models.

I'd also say "significant" would mean "Someone who doesn't study Star Trek can notice them." I'm not even sure the differences between the original ILM Galaxy class and the 4 foot model even reach the general definition of "significant". Even though they jump right out at us.

Even TAS uses the different models!
 
I don't mind the bending, even the breaking of certain cannon, however, some cannon are more resolute than others, so shouldn't be broken.
I just leave my mind at the door and enjoy it, and try to ignore the occasional egregious violations. Its a show run by these people today, tomorrows people may do something else entirely.
 
Day One. Where No Man Has Gone Before used footage of The Cage. As did The Corbomite Maneuver AND The Man Trap (depending on your definition of Day One). Most episodes ended with the final shot of the Enterprise from Where No Man Has Gone Before. Heck, the season 2 and 3 opening credits are exclusively footage from the pilots.

I think it was our own @aridas sofia (who will no doubt be annoyed at being invoked in a SNW thread :) ) who first put pen to paper in a sort of "Grand Unified Theory of Enterprise Evolution" - including publishing a packet of drawings called The Enterprise Heavy Cruiser Evolution Blueprints. Although the various "classes" of Enterprise (Constitution, Bonhomme Richard, Achernar, and of course Enterprise) had been showing up in his work through the mid 1980's.

It's a lovely idea, but it's not really borne out by the literal footage.

I approached Star Trek as if I was watching some Hollywood treatments of naval history, like iirc the 1976 film “Midway”. In such dramas, you might see US ships and aircraft stand in for Japanese, or more modern ships stand in for much earlier ones. I imagined it the way I thought it should look and definitely did not take what I was seeing onscreen literally if it didn’t make sense to me, or if making it make sense created more problems than it solved.
 
I always tend to give TOS, TAS, the TOS movies and S1-2 of TNG a bit of a pass on the canon/continuity stuff since they were making shit up as they went along, they didn’t have “writers rooms” like DS9/Voy/ENT and budgets, etc…were so different.
 
What does continuity have to do with discussing fiction? I was just asking how you differentiate things.



And I don't recall ever stating that SNW isn't canon either. But if you change things in one series where it overlaps with another I just find it easier to discuss as two separate series because I have no expectation that the two should line up (based on Goldsman's statements.)

Go ahead. That doesn't make "two timelines" where there's only one collection of TV series that are all set intentionally within the same loose/sloppy continuity.
 
Go ahead. That doesn't make "two timelines" where there's only one collection of TV series that are all set intentionally within the same loose/sloppy continuity.

Now if we can only combine all the separate SNW and TOS-TAS forums together to really drive home that point. :)
 
Now if we can only combine all the separate SNW and TOS-TAS forums together to really drive home that point. :)
giphy.gif
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top