What y'all have done is extremely downplayed Trek God's explanation, from a black perspective, as to what Khalil is going through.And yet no one has denied there are racial issues at play or being portrayed, on the contrary it is only you acting as though anyone has made such a claim. Attempted to imply there is inherent racism in pursuing or considering any line of analysis other than a single narrative is disingenuous and frankly comes across as deliberately cynical.
You still have presented no reason at all why those acknowledged racial issues preclude other aspects of the human condition, nor have you explained what you mean by "foundational motives".
Well, I sure have.
See below
[quote]
There are cultural drivers at play but all the evidence is strongly against there being underlying racial variance in social cognitive processes. Toxic masculinity is not specific to any given race, nor is it a liberal construct, on the contrary it is a very effective term for a variety of aspects of male behaviour which are well established to be pan cultural. Indeed there is a plethora of evidence for their expression across many hominid species in much the same forms we see throughout humanity. Those behaviours had and have been examined objectively long before and outside of the current wave of partisan politics you seek to blame.See below
[quote]
[/quote]But violence and the need for revenge are NOT just a "male" problem.
WHile Tobias's sister, Syonide and Lady Eve were more "in control" and "calm"... they are still in that spectrum where Khalil now is.
And the manipulation of Khalil was the idea of Tobias' sister , was it not? And certainly encouraged with a "testimony" by Syonide, who seems to have been on the same journey as Khalil, but is further down the road. So Khalil's "development" doesn't seem to be driven by someone with toxic masculinity problems (as abusers often pattern what they have experienced/been taught).
WHile Tobias's sister, Syonide and Lady Eve were more "in control" and "calm"... they are still in that spectrum where Khalil now is.
And the manipulation of Khalil was the idea of Tobias' sister , was it not? And certainly encouraged with a "testimony" by Syonide, who seems to have been on the same journey as Khalil, but is further down the road. So Khalil's "development" doesn't seem to be driven by someone with toxic masculinity problems (as abusers often pattern what they have experienced/been taught).
Far from being "as different as fingerprints" those patterns are well documented as being evident throughout pretty much all societies and actually don't correlate with race at all. The values placed on those behaviours vary widely between cultures but there is essentially no evidence that sexual violence or misogyny have a racial basis.
But the behaviors are not EXCLUSIVE to males. And how has Khalil shown sexual violence or misogyny (as opposed to feeling betrayed by a lover)?
Therefore the onus is on you to provide a case for why toxic masculinity is an invalid construct to apply here and make that argument consist of more than a glorified "because I say so".
[/quote]
Dodge gave examples of actual toxic masculinity... the attempted pimping of Jennifer, and the attack on the lesbian bar. Substitute a black lesbian with the antagonists in those situation, and the motivation would feel really different, possibly even crazy. So an argument that those antagonists are showing toxic masculinity would be on target.
Substitute a black lesbian for Khalil and his story line , and it would play out pretty much the same way. So would you say SHE was an example of toxic masculinity?
I see racism as a spectrum. The KKK would be "red" and Donald Trump rhetoric is "orange"...so most white people would rightfully say they aren't racist based on those. But there are other ways to be a "light racist", such as not acknowledging what Trek God has said (re-reading Christopher's comments, I think he gets it to a certain degree).
I now throw the ball to you to explain why the reasons that Trek God has given are NOT the primary drivers for Khalil? ANd also, why a female character wouldn't follow the same storyline.
Dodge gave examples of actual toxic masculinity... the attempted pimping of Jennifer, and the attack on the lesbian bar. Substitute a black lesbian with the antagonists in those situation, and the motivation would feel really different, possibly even crazy. So an argument that those antagonists are showing toxic masculinity would be on target.
Substitute a black lesbian for Khalil and his story line , and it would play out pretty much the same way. So would you say SHE was an example of toxic masculinity?
I see racism as a spectrum. The KKK would be "red" and Donald Trump rhetoric is "orange"...so most white people would rightfully say they aren't racist based on those. But there are other ways to be a "light racist", such as not acknowledging what Trek God has said (re-reading Christopher's comments, I think he gets it to a certain degree).
I now throw the ball to you to explain why the reasons that Trek God has given are NOT the primary drivers for Khalil? ANd also, why a female character wouldn't follow the same storyline.
So anyway... there's one thing we can all agree upon, and that's that this has been a really good first season.
Looking forward to the finale tonight(well, tomorrow for me).
Work on Season 2 is already underway and according to the writer's room instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BhpLeauHISf/
Either Tobias Whale will be back for S2, or he's joining the writing team
Indeed. We CAN all agree on it...[/quote]
Last edited: