• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

BEETLEJUICE, BEETLEJUICE (2024)

Some spoilers to follow...

I had an absolute blast with this sequel. The bonkers adventure is full of great humor and wonderful performances from the entire cast. I greatly enjoyed watching the film juggle all of the different character arcs and storylines, and I especially enjoyed the broken relationship dynamics between Astrid and Lydia, heightened by the deep chemistry between Winona Ryder and Jenna Ortega. And it goes without saying that Michael Keaton's Beetlejuice was perfectly ridiculous as ever.

That said, I was I disappointed how the Delores thread ultimately didn't go anywhere, after opening with a great threat and juicy background. I was also a bit caught off guard by how the Jeremy thread suddenly came to a halt after spending so much time developing it and revealing the trap (I didn't see it coming but I imagine others did). As a result, the various arcs were a bit disjointed, but I still found overall tapestry was thematically effective.

I loved the little touches like how Lydia became an Elvira-esque host of a ghost hunting show (a genre that became rapidly and absurdly popular in the intervening years since the original film) while Delia of course became a performance artist to such a degree that would make JJ Caucus and Yoko Ono blush. And even though Jeremy turned out to be a murdering douchebag, I loved his treehouse!

Based on the trailers, I figured Burn Gorman would only appear in one or two scenes in the first act and that would be it, but I was pleasantly surprised that he had a significant supporting role to the point that he was part of the lip-syncing of Richard Harris' "MacArthur Park" sequence. I was also pleasantly surprised to see Santiago Cabrera pop up as Astrid's deceased father, Richard, although shamefully I couldn't place him until I saw his name in the credits.

Overall, the sequel is wonderfully bonkers if somewhat imperfect. Worth the wait and effort? Absolutely and I would do it again.
 
Looks like the movie is heading for a $110 million opening weekend; which is $20 million over its initial projected $90 million debut. If the numbers hold, it will Tim Burton's second biggest opening following 'Alice in Wonderland'. Also, $110 million means it has already made back its production budget.
 
Last edited:
Looks like the movie is heading for a $110 million opening weekend; which is $20 million over its initial projected $90 million debut. If the numbers hold, it will Tim Burton's second biggest opening following 'Alice in Wonderland'. Also, $110 million means it has already made back its production budget.
So probably enough to justify another one. Will that one be called BEETLEJUICE, BEETLEJUICE, BEETLEJUICE?
 
Just got out of the theatre, and I loved it.


Loved the two different ways they got around not bringing Jeffrey Jones back, first with the claymation flashback and them with Charles' headless ghost, both feeling so very Tim Burton. And how perfectly Delia with her "Look what happened to me" line.
I also appreciated them reuniting at the end. The actor may be a piece of shit, but the character of Charles deserves a happy afterlife.
The ending actually fooled me for a bit. Showing Lydia and Astrid travelling together (btw, loved the shoutout to Mario Bava), Astrid getting married and then about to give birth, I was kind of expecting them to show Lydia's whole life like that, thinking "but they've teased a third one in the interviews". But then Beetlebaby appeared, and I didn't know what the hell they were going for. The ending certainly is open for interpretation. Until part three, anyway.
Also, yay, Danny DeVito!

Another little in-joke I noticed, when the sleazebag said he wanted to marry Lydia on Halloween, she says it was in two days. October 29 is Winona's birthday.

Also, poor Bob
[/Spoiler].
 
Loved the two different ways they got around not bringing Jeffrey Jones back, first with the claymation flashback and them with Charles' headless ghost, both feeling so very Tim Burton. And how perfectly Delia with her "Look what happened to me" line.

I also appreciated them reuniting at the end. The actor may be a piece of shit, but the character of Charles deserves a happy afterlife.
Yup, I loved how they handled Charles. I knew he was going to be dead for the film but that means nothing for a film like this, so I anxiously curious to see how they utilized him. The result was perfect...and I wonder who was the uncredited actor who played him.

Also, yay, Danny DeVito!
I was spoiled maybe a few days before I saw the film that he was going to be in it. I would've loved to been surprised by his sudden appearance...and swift departure! Alas...but it was still a lot of fun.

Another little in-joke I noticed, when the sleazebag said he wanted to marry Lydia on Halloween, she says it was in two days. October 29 is Winona's birthday.
I didn't catch that...but my girlfriend did!

Also, poor Bob
I wanted to give Bob so many hugs! :wah:
 
Just got back from the theater and thought it was a lot of fun. Some of the storylines end a bit abruptly, and a bit similar to the original, but it's still very enjoyable. The cast is excellent, especially Catherine O'Hara :lol: I'd give it a B.
 
The quality of HT is a writers' issue, IMO. It used to be a group of five writers who would write material and then collectively decided what got into the video.
As far as I know, since Screen Junkies was bought by Fandom, one left the company completely (Dan Murrell) and two went onto other projects in the same company (Joe Starr and Danielle Radford), and as far as I know no new writers came aboard.
So it is now completely written by two writers, Spencer Gilbert (head writer for most of the show's run) and Lon Harris. Both are very capable (and very likable guys, btw), but it just shows that three other really funny writers who also might keep each other in check are not there anymore.
 
The quality of HT is a writers' issue, IMO. It used to be a group of five writers who would write material and then collectively decided what got into the video.
As far as I know, since Screen Junkies was bought by Fandom, one left the company completely (Dan Murrell) and two went onto other projects in the same company (Joe Starr and Danielle Radford), and as far as I know no new writers came aboard.
So it is now completely written by two writers, Spencer Gilbert (head writer for most of the show's run) and Lon Harris. Both are very capable (and very likable guys, btw), but it just shows that three other really funny writers who also might keep each other in check are not there anymore.
I didn't know any of that so thank you for filling in the blanks there. That makes a lot of sense, especially why the quality has been so erratic as of late.
 
Just saw it. Overall it was entertaining, and I'll echo others about Belucci's character ultimately going nowhere. Honestly I felt she didn't even need to be in the movie at all, as the only thing worthy of note that she provided was Beetlejuice's backstory, which quite frankly we didn't really need to know, especially with the silly Italian voiceover. I also felt that they should have given Rory a better end than just being eaten by a sandworm and completely forgotten about. At the least, they could have shown him and Delores hooking up in the afterlife. The one thing that really bugged me though was the animated sequence of Charles on the plane and then getting eaten by the shark. The whole thing screamed "Two And A Half Men final episode" to me (which, if you don't know what I'm talking about, featured an exaggerated Charlie Sheen's likeness in an animated sequence almost identical in style to this one, because Sheen didn't come back to film scenes due to his feud with Chuck Lorre.) I get why they did it, but I didn't think it was actually necessary to animate it. Delia's description would have sufficed.
 
Just watched the movie.
Glad I watched it but also won't ever watch it again. It was weird that Ortego didn't get to really resolve her own story and arc with the ghost boy just as Beetlejuice didn't get to resolve his with Belucci. And as amazing as Keaton was, half of his time felt wasted to lip-syncing scenes that, for such a short movie, felt like they went on for too long. All of the cast was amazing, really, and super entertaining to watch overall. But the story and movie as a whole was less so.
 
I finally saw it. I guess I was expecting too much, I found it mostly just "watchable" if I'm honest.
Like, I wasn't bored...but I was scratching my head a lot about filmmaking decisions.

It was just okay. Not remotely a patch on the original.

And I was super distracted by the way they blurred Winona and Catherine's lower eyelids into oblivion. It looked so unnatural in most shots. The photo of Lydia from '88 had more definition in her eyes than now-Lydia did.
 
Back
Top