THE Batman makes me think of Nicholson-Joker's speech:
"And where ... is the Batman? He's at home - washing his tights!"
Except that line doesn't make sense in-universe, because that Batman wears a cumbersome rubber suit instead of tights. Although I suppose that in that universe, there could be a history of fictional comic-book superheroes who wear tights.
Except it does make sense because Joker is just making a joke about Batman's costume and trying to ridicule him. He is not making a serious description. Jokes are facetious stories, not exact statements.
No, that's not the point. The point is, if the Joker lives in a universe where the only real superhero does not wear tights, where would the idea of a superhero wearing tights have even come from in the first place? How would it be a reference that his listeners in-universe would recognize, which is a necessary part of getting a joke?
Tights are worn by ballet dancers, acrobats, gymnasts, little girls. People get that joke without having seen any other real or fictional superheroes.
Joker is just making fun of Batman's appearance because Batman is wearing what looks like a skin-tight, one-piece leotard, regardless of material.
That doesn't even make sense. The joke was not based on the mere existence of tights, it was based on the conventional association of tights with superheroes.
Oh, come on. Nobody would look at this and call it a leotard.
Besides, it's a JOKE, not a description.
Kindly stop assuming I'm a moron.
Yes, obviously it's a joke, but a joke only works if the audience understands the reference. That is my point. A joke about superheroes and tights works for us because we live in a universe where comic-book superheroes are known for wearing tights. So it's incongruous for that same joke to appear in movies and cinematic universes where the actual superheroes do not wear tights.
In-universe, the Joker is basically calling Batman a sissy.
Except it does make sense because Joker is just making a joke about Batman's costume and trying to ridicule him. He is not making a serious description. Jokes are facetious stories, not exact statements.
We fans tend to over analyze everything!
Besides, it sounds a lot better than:
"And where ... is the Batman? He's at home - washing his rubber!"![]()
I noticed the same thing in Luke Cage where some character referred to all the superheroes who wore Spandex, even though none of the MCU heroes' costumes fit that description
No need to over analyze.
I will never understand hearing that sentiment from people who participate in an online bulletin board. The whole reason we're here is to talk about stuff. Analyzing the details of a thing is a way to generate topics for conversation. Especially on a genre-fandom board, where probably the majority of the conversation is about analyzing tiny details. Though I'm sure that people on sports discussion boards overanalyze sports plays and draft picks and whatever, and people on political discussion boards overanalyze every quote and sound bite from the candidates, etc. Overanalysis drives the Internet, as much as porn and cat videos do.
Oh God. Sudden horrible flashbacks of Captain America's first Avengers costume.I don't know, Captain America's Gerber Baby outfit comes pretty close.
![]()
Oh God. Sudden horrible flashbacks of Captain America's first Avengers costume.
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.