Personally, I wish they were doing
X-Men 4 rather than
X-Men: First Class. There's always plenty of time for prequels later. And I think the cast would be cheaper to assemble than you'd think. It's not like Famke Janssen, James Marsden, or Shawn Ashmore are huge stars. Since Xavier is in a different body anyway, a recast probably isn't out of the question. Kelsey Grammer seems grateful to be playing anything that isn't Frasier. Halle Berry would be too expensive but the fans have been begging for her to be recast since day one. You would have to forget about Hugh Jackman, but I think it's high time we started seeing more
X-Men movies without Wolverine. Leave him to his spin-offs. The one actor that probably would require them to whip out the big checkbook is Ian McKellen, but he's worth every penny.
BTW, are they still doing the
Deadpool spin-off film?
io9 also hypothesizes that the FC series could end up being a "reboot by stealth". So did last Friday's IGN Movies "Keepin' it Reel" podcast, for that matter.
I think that's a definite possibility, although I agree with the others who say that any outright contradictions between the
First Class movies and the original 3 films won't occur until at least the
2nd First Class film. And even then, I think it depends upon who the producers are. I expect that, as long as Bryan Singer is involved, his 1st 2
X-Men films (and by extension,
The Last Stand,) will remain at least vaguely canon. I would also be surprised if Lauren Shuler Donner allowed that to happen, but I can't say for sure.
Right now, I hope they're able to maintain some form of unified
X-Men movie continuity. The problem with reboots often is that the reboot will just retread a lot of the same established territory. And I don't think the
X-Men movies are at quite the saturation point yet. (For that matter, neither were the
Spider-Man movies.) Keeping the movies in the same continuity will, in some ways, force the new movies to seek out new territory & new storylines and I want to see the franchise moving forward, not repeating itself. (Really, the only story that they totally botched was the Dark Phoenix saga, and I don't think that there's anyone currently at 20th Century Fox who could do it right if they did try to remake it.)
I'm really interested in this idea of
X-Men: First Class as a period piece in the 1960s. I think we need more period action films. (I was pretty bummed that
Casino Royale wasn't set in the 1950s/60s.)
I only saw X3 in the theater once and don't really remember it being as bad as people make it out to be...X1 & X2 were great but maybe I need to see X3
again before having so much hate.
It's not nearly as good as the Bryan Singer films and it totally botches the Dark Phoenix saga. However, I think it also has several elements to recommend it. While Brett Ratner doesn't do the quiet moments as well as Singer, he does have a flair for the epic. My favorite moments are when Phoenix kills Xavier and when Wolverine kills Phoenix. Plus, since it's a sequel, it felt free to be a little bolder with its storyline (as opposed to
X-Men Origins: Wolverine, which just rehashed a bunch of plot points that we already knew from the
X2 backstory).
I think it was implied that Phoenix "allowed" herself to be allied with Magneto because the dark aspect of the Phoenix force was starting to take control and influencing her decisions. Jean wasn't in control of herself at all I don't think (I'll admit I've only seen this film once so I have forgotten the details) and the Phoenix was taking control and addicted to emotion. Magneto has a very powerful charismatic persona and possesses great power himself so I'm thinking the Phoenix force was attracted to him on that basis. Magneto also realized this from his previous dealings with Jean Grey and her erratic control over her powers (the reason for the flashback scene at the start of the film to set this up) and knew or thought he could manipulate her to his bidding. Made perfect sense but wasn't really explained.
The problem is that Phoenix came off as a weak, uninteresting character because she became Magneto's flunky. She would have come off a lot stronger if she had made Magneto her bitch, or at least been so powerful & unpredictable that no one could really ally with her at all. Phoenix is such a powerful character, she really demands her own movie. Instead, they tried to turn her into a subplot for the Cure storyline.
Net effect of X2 was Jean Grey dying but not really dying. And Nightcrawler...who didn't return the next movie, but might have if Singer had...maybe.
I doubt it. From what I've heard, Alan Cumming really REALLY hated the lengthy make-up process. I suspect that, even if they had something really interesting for Nightcrawler to do, they'd still have to recast.
Mags was already fully evil in the first movie. He wanted to mutate humanity regardless of the effects, and sacrifice Rogue to that end.
Aye, but he didn't know his mutation process was lethal; he thought he'd only be killing one girl. Which is evil and bad, yes, but not
quite as evil and bad as trying to kill billions.
Assuming his mutation process really was lethal. There's still the possibility that Senator Kelly didn't die. Rather, he mutated into a shapeshifter that couldn't, at the time, understand or control his transformation. He accidentally shapeshifted into salt water because that was what he had spent a lengthy amount of time in contact with. "Are you sure you saw what you saw?"
I think a reboot would be neat if shown in a bit different and perhaps more... "Nolan-esque" "realistic" manner. For all that is worth. As much as I liked Singer's two movies they're a bit, I dunno... Goofy? Almost like they're kind of winking at the audience that they know this is silly or that they're trying to make an allagory to supressed groups of people? (Zach, have you tried not being a mutant?)
I'd like to see the subject taken a bit more seriously and dramaitcly and I think Nolan showed with his two Batman movies this can be done.
I don't think what you're thinking of would work. Comparing
X-Men to
Batman in this way doesn't quite mesh.
The reason why Nolan's "realistic"
Batman movies work is because they are a reaction against the extreme stylization of the Tim Burton & Joel Schumacher movies. Gotham City goes from an eccentric metropolis filled with giant statues & neon lights to... Chicago basically.
OTOH, I think Singer's
X-Men movies are about as reserved & "realistic" as an action movie about superpowered mutants could get. Notice they had to drastically tone down the Phoenix storyline. At no point do they ever go into space. They also replaced the colorful spandex costumes of the comic book with sleek black leather.
At this point, if they were to reboot the
X-Men movies, to distinguish them from the old ones, they'd have to go the other way. The costumes would be much more flamboyant. There would be a lot more space travel & time travel. Etc.