Because it screws up the sync with the music.Why are people so hung up on the Episode tag?
That's a myth from the same fellow that told you that he always meant for Greedo to shoot but he framed the shot badly and that he always meant for Jabba to be a big slug even though he moved the camera around in a way that the only way to make that a special effect in 1977 would have been witchcraft.You lot do know it was initially going to be there, and they only pulled it at the 11th hour when the studio kicked up a fuss that it would confuse audiences, right?
I'm sorry you missed Star Wars.Should I be demanding that put in bad VHS tracking and half of MFI January advert in the middle of one scene? Because that's what the version I grew up with looked like!
Lucas kept tinkering with the sound mix between the May 25th release and the wider mono mix. I'm a mono mix man myself. (It's what's on The Story of Star Wars for one thing.)Ain't no such thing as "the original Star Wars". That movie was a work in progress from the jump, and it never stopped changing from it's premiere, all through it's initial run, to the re-releases, to the TV edit, the VHS remaster, the laser discs, the SEs, the DVDs, blurays, all the way to maclunkey!
But to say that the changes from 1977 to 1993 are even comparable to the changes that were made in 1997 (and 2000 whatever) is silly.
Of course the SE special effects are older now than the original FX were when the SEs came out. So how can we even put up with those video game FX from the mid 90s?
And isn't it really time to re-do Jurassic Park?
. The scene has remained unfixed in the 2004 SE, 2011SE and 2019SE releases - despite George and Lucasfilm being aware of the mistake / issue. Quite 'a little flaw', no?