And as fuckin awesome as this version of it is, the timing is WAY off, I like the first better. Still kicksass to see Nimoy though
AICN Posts a new version of the trailer!
- Thread starter Flake
- Start date
And as fuckin awesome as this version of it is, the timing is WAY off, I like the first better. Still kicksass to see Nimoy though
I love the fact they kept the red alert sound fx. Little stuff like that keeps my spirits high and brings me back. Nimoy looks great as spock again. It's nice to see an old friend.
And as fuckin awesome as this version of it is, the timing is WAY off, I like the first better. Still kicksass to see Nimoy though
Well they stuck the Nero 'the wait is over bit' earlier in the trailer and that felt a touch out of place there.
Ah, but it replaced the damn duct tape shot ("damned" because of all the whinging it caused, not because I actually care about the duct tape). If only this had been the first version released... if only...
Either way, thanks to the magic of computers, I'll edit up my own definitive version. Or, to be less pretentious, I'll stick the Nimoy shot over the end of the first trailer, because I don't give a crap about losing Nero's line.
And as fuckin awesome as this version of it is, the timing is WAY off, I like the first better. Still kicksass to see Nimoy though
Well they stuck the Nero 'the wait is over bit' earlier in the trailer and that felt a touch out of place there.
Naw not that, the entire pacing of it. Again another time pandering to the fans kinda screws with things. I love the trailer and seeing Nimoy, but I am glad the first one is the official in theatre version. It's so much more dramatic and paced very smoothly.
Well, there goes the Photoshop award for whatever caption contest I choose to use the original one in.
Yeah... I think I missed that part too......?
Maybe he/she is refering to the Orion seducing Kirk???
(though it looks the other way around to me.)
(or maybe there's a porno version out already... "Star Trek: The Rape of Someone's Childhood")
>snicker<
Perhaps not, but anyone in black with a freaky mask clearly is.
Perhaps not, but anyone in black with a freaky mask clearly is.
um...no
Having clicked on that spoiler tag, and then read your "unique" signature line underneath it Squiggy, I don't think I've laughed so hard all month.
Yup. I was referring to the cringe-worthy scene with kid-Kirk and and the leather-clad police officer.
But that would go against TEH CANN-ON!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I wonder why there's no credit for a sehlat at imdb?
The (first) trailer was created for the Bond-going movie audience. Adding Spock is not going to deter potential viewers but bring in more of an audience. It's how the story is.
Do we, as life long Trek fans have a hold or say on Trek in a special way or something? Why can't we look beyond the narrow and let the Trek universe expand?
I didn't see any life long Batman fans complaining like a broken record that Henry Ducard was the one and same person as Ra's Al-Ghul. Or that Two-Face in TDK was not created by throwing acid to his face but by getting burned by petrol. Or that Lt. Gordon didn't have any red haired daughter but actually two sons? Or that Batman was wearing a high-tech hardening cloth for a cape? Or that Joker didn't use the acid-spitting coat flower?
If anything, the success of TDK laid completely on the fact that it was a masterpiece of a movie, whose implications has made DC change the way Batman comics are being written. Next year they'll have a complete reboot on the Batman mythos which closely follows Begins. How has Begins or TDK been bad for the Batman franchise?
So why can't Star Trek be given a meager chance to be the great thing that rejuvinates the franchise? Why can't Star Trek have its own Batman Begins or TDK?
