A non underwear related comment: Just watched the episode again and picked up that it seems as though Robbie made the decision to attack Daisy with little to no provocation; just because she might find out what's in the garage. I mean sure clearly she was being suspicious but for all he knows she could have been a reporter tracking a story and he was ready to key-knuckle her in the back of the head.
Indeed, if I'm reading this right the Ghost Rider itself saw she was an innocent (for lack of a better term) and let her live. So maybe Robbie is really the "anti" side of this anti-hero and the spirit of vengeance is the "hero"?
Honestly, I think there's more complaining about the complaining than the actual complaining.
For me the funny part is that it wasn't even much of a complaint to begin with. Merely the *suggestion* that *maybe* that one particular shot was
"a tad unnecessary". Apparently that's what qualifies as "overrating" these days.
I didn't even think much of it when I first posted the comment in passing, but the disproportionate response sure made me sit up and pay attention. Methinks some here doth protest too much.
Also note that I had no problem with the fully nude android scene, because that scene actually served a purpose and made sense in context. That other shot...not so much IMO.
Having just recently started reading Runaways, I would love to see the Pride, or at least get a reference to them.
This is right in their wheelhouse too as IIRC at least two of them are of the mystical persuasion. They'd certainly wouldn't want an earthbound spirit of vengeance running around their territory, ripping spines out of their serf's backs. That's assuming of course that they'll be sticking close to the source material.
I'm getting nauseous from all this going around and around in circles.
Me too.

You're right though I did miss that particular comment and that's on me. Apologies for the unfounded insinuation.
My initial point stands however, since (unless I missed anything else of substance) that's one slightly hyperbolic comment against about five reasonably tempered ones. Does the general backlash and accusations of uptight prudishness honestly seem fair and proportional to you?