• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Agents of SHIELD - Season 2 Discussion Threads. (Spoilers Likely)

Ward now wants to be Garrett. Daddy's dead, so now he's the daddy.

As for the official status of SHIELD, I don't believe it has any. Fury is now more of a spiritual leader-- he wants the idea of SHIELD to survive and be rebuilt and he brought Coulson back from the dead and tasked him to achieve that goal, because he believed only Coulson had the character to do so. Gonzalez appears to be a former SHIELD commander who kept his faction going in a manner similar to Coulson (but with a bigger boat), but it is very odd that we have heard nothing of him until now. What has he been doing? Battling HYDRA? It seems like we would have heard about that, either from the agents that Coulson has been recruiting or from HYDRA operatives. Even if they were just laying low and saving their own asses, Talbot would have been after them as unaccounted SHIELD assets. And Fury is still out there somewhere with his own undoubtedly impressive former SHIELD assets, and it's hard to believe that he would not have been aware. It's all very out of the blue.
 
I have no problem buying that The Real SlimSHIELD has kept off Coulson's radar in the chaos following the HYDRA reveal. Earlier on, they demonstrated graphically via a map the scope of SHIELD assets that were believed to be compromised by HYDRA. Add to that SHIELD assets that would have been gobbled up by the likes of Talbot across the world and whatnot...there are probably lots of former SHIELD assets that remain unaccounted for...and plenty of HYDRA types for GonzalesSHIELD to battle elsewhere.
 
Ward now wants to be Garrett. Daddy's dead, so now he's the daddy.

As for the official status of SHIELD, I don't believe it has any. Fury is now more of a spiritual leader-- he wants the idea of SHIELD to survive and be rebuilt and he brought Coulson back from the dead and tasked him to achieve that goal, because he believed only Coulson had the character to do so. Gonzalez appears to be a former SHIELD commander who kept his faction going in a manner similar to Coulson (but with a bigger boat), but it is very odd that we have heard nothing of him until now. What has he been doing? Battling HYDRA? It seems like we would have heard about that, either from the agents that Coulson has been recruiting or from HYDRA operatives. Even if they were just laying low and saving their own asses, Talbot would have been after them as unaccounted SHIELD assets. And Fury is still out there somewhere with his own undoubtedly impressive former SHIELD assets, and it's hard to believe that he would not have been aware. It's all very out of the blue.

Short version: Gonzalez is Admiral Cain.
Ironic, no? ;)
 
So if Gonzales believes Coulson to have just taken over his faction of SHIELD (without sanction from Fury), I guess that means SLJ may be back for the finale to straighten Gonzales out and unite the SHIELDs.
 
I think that Ward really cares about Ward. He cares about Skye only as something that he wants to possess. He cares about Agent 33 as somebody who helps him to build himself up to emulate his old mentor. Following in Garrett's footsteps could be seen as a way of continuing his devotion to Garrett.

That's just not what I see in his eyes when he looks at 33. He's besotten with her. And he doesn't have the cynical, devious quality to him that Garrett had when he was training Ward. Ward is what Garrett made him -- a loyal attack dog. His entire psyche is built around being utterly devoted to someone else's cause. He's a weapon who needs someone to aim him, a purpose to direct his violence. But without anyone willing to do that, he has to try to do it himself, to aim himself in what he imagines to be the service of someone else's cause.

And that's the intriguing paradox of him. Yes, he is on his own and setting his own agenda, but it's an agenda of service. He needs to be needed, but he's defining for himself what constitutes that. Which was why his view of what he had to do to win over Skye was so twisted and misguided. He's sort of like... oh, maybe John Hinckley, Jr., who was obsessed with Jodie Foster and thought he could win her love by murdering President Reagan. It was what he thought she wanted rather than what she actually wanted, so he was defining it for himself, but he thought of it as something he was doing in service to someone else.


I don't see any great desire to do good in him. He's made some noise in that direction, but it's delusional...a way of rationalizing his actions at best.
I never said he wanted to do good. He doesn't understand what that means. What he needs is to have a purpose, to prove himself worthy of someone's service. When I said he wanted to redeem himself, I wasn't speaking in terms of morality, but in terms of his sense of self-worth -- he failed in his service to Garrett, and he wants to make up for that failure by successfully serving someone else.

The thing is, this is a Joss Whedon show, even if it's mainly in the hands of Jed Whedon and Maurissa Tancharoen. And the thing about most of Whedon's shows is that you can't really apply the concepts of good and evil to them. Their characters aren't defined that way. They're more just people trying to do what seems like a good idea at the time and screwing it up in various ways. There was a fairly clear definition of good and evil in Buffy, but then you had evil characters trying to redeem themselves and good characters going to the dark side and it got a lot muddier. Same with Angel, where the Apocalypse was revealed to be an everyday process of moral entropy rather than a single event, and where the heroes' climactic struggle wasn't so much about destroying evil as deciding whether or not to compromise with it. Firefly was about criminals trying to get by in the world, confronting a society that was benevolent in its intentions but often oppressive toward those who didn't fit social norms. Dollhouse was a story of people making horrible, destructive choices for what they believed to be legitimate or necessary reasons, a series in which the most clear-cut "good guy" character became increasingly compromised and the initially ruthless, amoral antagonists ended up being the greatest champions.

Agents of SHIELD started out reverting to a more conventional good guys/bad guys mold, but there's always been that Whedonesque ambiguity in it, those questions of whether the good guys' actions were really so positive. That's only intensified since the HYDRA revelation. Ward is very much a character who resides in those Whedonesque gray areas. I mean, look at the very conception of the character. When the show began, he was the most conventional heroic type in the entire cast -- the young, handsome white guy who was clean-cut, ultra-capable, and kind of bland, just like 90 percent of action heroes. He was the one we were conditioned to accept as the hero and root for, and that turned out to be a total fraud. That's a classic Whedon subversion of conventional images of heroism.

But Whedon villains are no more conventional. Just because Ward's the bad guy now, that doesn't mean he's going to be the kind of sinister mustache-twirler we'd expect to see in a simpler show. To understand Whedon shows, we need to expect our own expectations of heroism and villainy to be subverted. Before, we thought we were supposed to root for Ward, and he turned out to be unexpectedly villainous. Now, we define him as the villain and expect him to fit a certain mold, so it follows that he'll end up subverting those expectations as well and show sympathetic qualities we didn't think we'd see in him.
 
BTW, considering that the actual US military can't even get enough money to keep things running these days, how does SHIELD get the funds for a carrier and/or multiple helicarriers?
 
So if Gonzales believes Coulson to have just taken over his faction of SHIELD (without sanction from Fury), I guess that means SLJ may be back for the finale to straighten Gonzales out and unite the SHIELDs.

Gonzales believes that Nick Fury failed.

Failure should not be rewarded.

Failure should not be able to pick a successor who will continue to fail in an identical manner.

Gonzales believes that anyone handpicked by Fury is unworthy of the job.

Coulson is there fore not allowed to lead S.H.I.E.L.D..
 
BTW, considering that the actual US military can't even get enough money to keep things running these days, how does SHIELD get the funds for a carrier and/or multiple helicarriers?

Maybe SHIELD holds the patent on velcro? ;)

I kid but something like that can't be too far from the truth. I mean 50 years of gathering exotic, sometimes alien technology, they must have reverse engineered a few relatively harmless things for commercial use.
 
Gonzolas also reminds me a bit of Admiral Cain- a successful commander striking out on his own in a power vacuum, establishing a 'real' organization to carry on the war effort.
I noticed his version of the SHIELD emblem is in a true shield shape instead of the older one in a circle.

I agree with Christopher's assessment of Ward- he has made Agent 33 his focus to help, asking nothing in return. When she adopted the guise of Skye he rejected it, when she became herself finally he could connect with her.

I do wish Fritz-Simmons would resolve their issues- it has a lot of dramatic tension but it is getting a bit old for me.
 
I wonder how many people knew that Arnim Zola was behind a lot of HYDRA being in SHIELD? Pierce obviously, but did Fury know? Coulson? Does any of Gonzalez! SHIELD know? I wonder if any of them are still HYDRA?

And I didn't think Hartley was SHIELD, I thought she was a mercenary, like Hunter, but Gonzalez said that she saved his life during the HYDRA breakout.

With the SHEILD files released oline it's a good bet that everybody kows about Zola's involvement with SHIELD and Hydra..

I'm sorry, but I meant before the collapse and info dump, did Fury ever know that insight is largely Zola's baby? He of course knew about insight, but did he know that Zola wrote the algorithm? And the reason I'm asking now, did Gonzalez know? Where are these guys just popping up from?

And with all of the bases Coulson has found including the Konig dodecatuplets, there's stuff out there we just haven't seen, aircraft carriers included. Who's at the Hub? Did that building just cease to exist because it hasn't been shown?
What about the Fridge? Blonsky was being held in Alaska, is he still? Just because some moist tart throws an aircraft carrier at Gonzalez doesn't make him the director.
 
Most shields throughout history have been round shields. Kite shields didn't appear (at least in Europe) until the latter half of the fist millennium.
 
BTW, considering that the actual US military can't even get enough money to keep things running these days, how does SHIELD get the funds for a carrier and/or multiple helicarriers?

Which "SHIELD" are you talking about?

Are you talking about the legal entity that existed before April 2014? That SHIELD, as an international paramilitary, presumably got its funds through contributions paid by each of its participating member states through their domestic taxation programs--same way, for instance, NORAD is paid for by both U.S. and Canadian taxpayers.

Do you mean Coulson's underground organization? Well, we don't know what happened the Avengers Hellicarrier or any of the SHIELD aircraft carriers after the Hydra uprising. But I do wonder how Coulson's organization pays for its assets -- fuel for the Bus and those quinjets ain't cheap. To say nothing of how he pays his agents, feeds them, keeps the plumbing and electricity going, etc. I find myself speculating, again, that perhaps Fury gave Coulson access to a secret Swiss bank account.

Do you mean Gonzalez's organization? We don't know. If Gonzalez's organization has the backing of one or more governments the way the original SHIELD did, then presumably their assets are paid for by someone's taxpayers.

I do wish Fritz-Simmons would resolve their issues- it has a lot of dramatic tension but it is getting a bit old for me.

The Fitz/Simmons arc is interesting to me, because for so long they had almost no identities of their own outside of each other. I want them to resolve their issues and get together, but they need to find themselves first. And they've both made moves to do that, but in some ways they've done this in the most hurtful ways possible.

Simmons ran away from Fitz, I think, because she wasn't ready for his declaration of love, nor for the emotional responsibility of supporting him as he recovered, nor for the changes he underwent. She wasn't ready for that kind of commitment, but didn't really have a sense of herself separate from Fitz--so she ran.

Fitz reacted to this by losing a hell of a lot of trust in her, in spite of his using her as his "affection object" in his hallucinations. So when he learns about Skye's powers, he has his freakout, gets over it -- and then begins assuming the worst about what Simmons's freakouts over Raina mean for Skye. Which, of course, hurts Simmons more than she can admit -- that Fitz has so much less trust in her than he used to. It's not fair of Fitz to react that way, anymore than it was fair of her to run away from him.

Meanwhile, they're divided by a philosophical take on superpowers. Fitz is coming at it from the presumption that superpowers are a neutral status, like being tall or having blue eyes. Simmons is coming at this from the presumption that powers are a disease, are a condition the human body is not supposed to have, and that those who have powers are patients--either they must be treated and cured, or they must be prevented from spreading. Both of their perceptions are colored by their reactions to Fitz's own neurological status; Fitz has accepted his status as being simply a part of him, now that he's had a year to acclimate to them; but Simmons still hasn't fully adjusted to his neurological status and views it as a defect in what used to be a properly-functioning brain. They're both projecting their issues with Fitz's neurological status onto Skye--Fitz looks at her and sees someone who has, like him, changed in ways that are scary, but ultimately are okay; Simmons looks at her and sees a patient whose own body is being damaged involuntarily. And they're carrying this over into other areas--Simmons sees Trip (for whom she had feelings) killed by the Inhuman tech, sees Raina's post-transformation violence, and all she can see is a disease that needs to be contained and patients to be treated. Fitz looks at them and sees a new minority group, sees people who were "born this way."

So they've both got a hell of a lot of trust issues to work on, and a lot of philosophical bridges to cross. They're both coming at these issues from the same POV--they both want people safe and cared for and accepted, but they have wildly differing assumptions about what it means to be safe, and those assumptions are complicated by their own relationship issues. It's gonna take a long time for them to earn one-another's trust again, and to learn to see things from the others' perspective.

I'm sorry, but I meant before the collapse and info dump, did Fury ever know that insight is largely Zola's baby?

Was Project Insight largely Zola's baby? The impression I got was that Zola's role was restricted to writing the algorithm that would identify anti-Hydra targets. It's unclear whether the original idea for Insight came from legit SHIELD agents or Hydra infiltrators. Clearly, the idea that SHIELD would use three new hellicarriers to target threats to international security in advance was one Fury thought came from within SHIELD -- may even have come from Fury himself!

There are two possibilities:

1. Insight started as an actual SHIELD project ("Let's drone-kill threats to international security, but with hellicarriers!") and was then hijacked by Hydra as an opportunistic attempt at a coup d'etat.

2. Insight started as a Hydra idea ("Let's trick SHIELD into building us hellicarrers we can use to kill everyone who would oppose us!") and then Hydra disguised it as a SHIELD anti-terrorist idea to get it funded and built.

Either way, I always got the impression that it ended up being more Alexander Pierce's baby than Zola's.

And with all of the bases Coulson has found including the Konig dodecatuplets, there's stuff out there we just haven't seen, aircraft carriers included.

A couple of underground bases and safehouses are one thing. Hiding an entire aircraft carrier is... I think somewhat implausible.

Who's at the Hub? Did that building just cease to exist because it hasn't been shown?

The Hub was surrendered to the United States Air Force under General Talbot in the episode "Providence."

Similarly, Providence Base was seized by the United States Air Force (in spite of it being on Canadian soil) in "Nothing Personal." I would speculate that it either remains under USAF control, that it is under joint-USAF/Royal Canadian Air Force control, or that it was turned over to the Canadian Forces after it was taken.

What about the Fridge?

Given that the NSA was spying on it, I would speculate that at some point, the Fridge would have been seized by the United States Armed Forces or by those of an allied government. (I got the impression that the Fridge was somewhere in the South Pacific--maybe it was taken by the Australian Defence Force?)

Given Talbot's comments in "Shadows," I think it is safe to say that the U.S. or allied governments seized control of every SHIELD base of which they were aware.

Just because some moist tart throws an aircraft carrier at Gonzalez doesn't make him the director.

I'd like to know who, besides a government, is capable of mobilizing the personnel and resources to operate an aircraft carrier.
 
Side-note: Have any of the SHIELD hellicarriers ever actually been given names? Because it would be nice to have something to distinguish the Avengers hellicarrier from the Insight hellicarriers.
 
Christopher: good point about Ward's agenda being simply service to others. He's got an unusual spin on the concept, but with his upbringing, perhaps the spin should be less of a surprise than it is to some.
 
Side-note: Have any of the SHIELD hellicarriers ever actually been given names? Because it would be nice to have something to distinguish the Avengers hellicarrier from the Insight hellicarriers.

In the comics, at least twenty have been officially named, starting with the Luxor in Cable. I'd also like to see the same dignity given to the MCU ships. Perhaps the Avengers 'Carrier could be named Iliad, after the comics' current SHIELD flagship? Alternatively, either Pericles or perhaps Hammurabi?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top